Remove this Banner Ad

carr coming home

  • Thread starter Thread starter tico
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I think scham would be worth carr

BUt Hey id prefer to keep carry than pav or schammer -- so im not disappointed. But u do just want the best for the boy (carr) and he wants to go home so we should do our best to get him where he wants to go. But at the same time be sure not to sacrafice the future of the club.

Fine line
 
I wonder if Freo will come up with an offer before Friday. They don't seem very interested.

If I was Josh, I'd be beginning to wonder why I was such a low priority.
 
Port don't want equitable, they want favourable. I'm sure Josh is mature enough not to be resentful in the teal next year.

Freo ought to get Richmond to show a bit more interest in J Carr. Maybe see how they feel about M Carr? Getting desperate and its only tuesday. Freo would be better if they weren't tempted by magic beans at the end of every season.
 
It's not that Freo don't seem very interested.. when you only consider 2 players from an entire list and those 2 are deemed off limits, how does that equal non-interest?

Port don't seem very interested in making a deal happen, and rightly so seeing Carr has said he'd go back to Port if a deal wasn't done.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Yeah, but Freo don't even seem to be putting together proposals (or at least there's no news of it from either party)

Thats just weird when its in regards to a player you've already offered financials to.
 
the fact of the matter is, the ball is in fremantle's ********ing court. they can have Carr, a hardened premiership player, in return for either pavlich or Schammer, who are yet to prove donkey ********. its simple. and if they are stubborn enough to continue to present those two as Untouchables, than we keep Josh and wait till next summer.
 
Apparently we've been offering picks and Mid range players (Woods, Grover's etc) according to Ricci on 46pr, i reckon the Carr-Schammer is a fair trade and will more than likely happen on friday. This will allow us to keep our 1st rounder and the chance to pick up another quality youngster at 11. Id love to keep Schammer because chances are he will go on and become a terrific player but you have to give quality to get quality.
 
agreed, carr and schammer is somewhat fair and i would be happy with that. but i mean Woods? grover? what hope would they have of getting a game for us?
 
Ah, the old dud-and-a-pick offer. Never fails to waste everyone's time.
 
Bollocks, If we trade Schammer it will be the biggest mistake in our history, even more than the Groom for Mcleod trade.

We do need to consider a good trade, but we need to try and get a quality player from another club to send to port. There is no way I'd trade schammer and If the powers that be do actually trade him, they should be sacked on the spot.
 
pafc4life said:
i understand what your saying about wanting to add Carr without the loss of another class midfielder, but you cannot say Haselby is a better player than Josh Carr!! you just cant!!

You don't have a clue and are embarrassing to your fellow port supporters.
 
FreoDocker said:
Bollocks, If we trade Schammer it will be the biggest mistake in our history, even more than the Groom for Mcleod trade.
Thats a pretty stupid comment. On what grounds would it be worse?

Wouldn't that require that Schammer be better than McLeod, and Carr be worse than Groom?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

ok 'Tony Clifton' you are clearly an absolute idiot. Josh Carr is a proven PREMIERSHIP on-baller and is the exact breed of player Freo need. Haselby is a stock-standard midfielder who has proved nothing and as far as im concerned is not half as talented, or accomplished, as Josh Carr. so shut the ******** up!
 
In Freo's case next season digging wont be an option because they will be firmly entrenched at the bottom. so keep pulling it, loser.
 
Porthos said:
Thats a pretty stupid comment. On what grounds would it be worse?

Wouldn't that require that Schammer be better than McLeod, and Carr be worse than Groom?

No I base it on the fact that undoubtedly Mcleod for Groom was our worst trade. However not learning from that mistake would be worse than the mistake itself. To trade a player like Schammer, who is just starting to show what he can do at the age of 19, for a quick imported fix is just stupid.

While I think Carr would be good for us, the trade would follow an all too familiar trend we have been developing.
 
well, im a passionate Port supporter. Pavlich is the personification of an overrated dud, and as for Schammer he is an unknown quantity as far as im concerned. Josh Carr has a premiership medallion around his neck and is one of the competition's true in and under players. Freo have nothing genuinly decent to offer us. Not to mention that the "Dockers" are a pathetic football club on the road to nowhere. so choke on my proverbial nutsack. Youre a joke mate.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You're too much lol.

Anyway, what is with this emphasis on premiership player/premiership medallion. Would he not have been the same player if you had of lost the grandfinal?
 
haha. i could just say "you guys aren't worth it" and go back from where i came but that would be no fun.

Port Adelaide FC
2004 AFL Premiers
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom