to suit AFL narrative & hand them the scapegoat? remembering we know they pressured ASADA to leave bit's out of the interim report that didn't suit.
Just say all and sundry are up to speed on square brackets (I wasn't), part of their report indicates an add on to Robson's evidence.
Just say an investigative journalist asks ASADA what the add on was all about, what would ASADA answer. Creating a preferred narrative isn't going to cut jt with a credible journalist. All I can think is texts like the ANZAC day one. Which would be a leap to far for mine.
On related matters, came across a 29 year old 20 year member today. And he said Hird has to go. They all knew what was going on. It was a passing conversation in a car. He alighted before me getting to tell him he was presuming something illegal transpired.

