Without disagreeing with you Lance, as I think the notion that legal professionals are in on some sort of fix is farcical (the AFL is a whole nother box and dice!), it was reported that "ASADA is of the view it should only be required to hand over evidence it will rely on to prosecute its case.", which doesn't seem to me to meet the requirements. Of course, being reported doesn't make it true

, and I could also be wrong.
The obligation applies to litigation (
including before courts, tribunals, inquiries, and in arbitration and other ADR processes) involving State Departments and agencies, as well as Ministers and officers where the State provides a full indemnity in respect of an action for damages brought against them personally.
Seems to indicate it should apply. In any event, what Lance said above that I bolded is correct.