- Joined
- Jan 7, 2005
- Posts
- 59,848
- Likes
- 61,048
- Location
- Down the rabbit hole
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Fatebringer
Can you explain for the masses on here one last time how Dank can be guilty and the players not?
It seems to be confusing a few people.
It seems to be confusing a few people.
He's up on a raft of charges, all of which are conceptually different to the players charges, even if they are linked in the real world.
The players were charged with Use. People wonder how the VFL footballer can go down and not the EFC players. He was charged with Attempted Use. That means intent is highly relevant, whereas the efc players can't be done for someone else's intent.
Dank can be done for intent however. Just as he can be done with trafficking. None of this impacts the players at all, which is why ASADA are being more than a bit cute pretending Dank findings matter regarding appealing the players.
Even though the tribunal can't be sure it was tb4 they've already said they were comfortable Dank thought it was. As a cynic I'm with Chip on this one. He'll get done for intent, and trafficking hexeralin.
No impact on players.

