No Opposition Supporters CAS hands down guilty verdict - Players appealing - Dank shot - no opposition - (cont in pt.2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

BrunoV

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 5, 2009
Posts
14,842
Likes
18,190
AFL Club
Essendon
I would not be so sure that this does not spell the end of AFL being subject to the WADA code.

The Federal Governments in Australia have bigger problems than winning Olympics (i.e. paying off corrupt IOC officials for a chance to win the games).

The AFL plays an important role as an administrator of a lot of public money that has a lot of public benefit.

For every $ that the government is not investing in Auskick and other community programs run by the AFL and its clubs it essentially has to find other ways to distribute that money to children to encourage participation in sport and there is no other body with the Australia-wide reach that AFL has. It becomes an expensive exercise.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Dan Cooper

Victory Salute
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Posts
8,071
Likes
4,801
Location
Red Corner
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Boxing
I would not be so sure that this does not spell the end of AFL being subject to the WADA code.

The Federal Governments in Australia have bigger problems than winning Olympics (i.e. paying off corrupt IOC officials for a chance to win the games).

The AFL plays an important role as an administrator of a lot of public money that has a lot of public benefit.

For every $ that the government is not investing in Auskick and other community programs run by the AFL and its clubs it essentially has to find other ways to distribute that money to children to encourage participation in sport and there is no other body with the Australia-wide reach that AFL has. It becomes an expensive exercise.
I agree with your sentiment there. But you are forgetting another football code with a different shaped ball who would no doubt love some extra government cash.
 

Dan Cooper

Victory Salute
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Posts
8,071
Likes
4,801
Location
Red Corner
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Boxing
It's still a basket case in an organisation sense.
No argument from me. As I've said too often already, the 34 players have been crucified by process. Whether they are ultimately found guilty or not guilty, the punishment has already exceeded any 'crime' they might have committed.
 

BrunoV

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 5, 2009
Posts
14,842
Likes
18,190
AFL Club
Essendon
These supposed Sport law 'experts' continue to disagree in their interpretations. Here Justin Quill says "there is now a great chance" the witnesses will be forced to appear, but if WADA choose not to go to the Supreme court to subpoena them, the case could be done pre-finals, and "by about Round 19."

Here are some excepts. Shortcut to full article below >


Supreme Court key to appeal


Some people can’t work out why WADA would appeal when the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority decided not to do so. The same burden and standard of proof apply.

So why would WADA think it can win an appeal, when ASADA — it would seem — thought it could not?

In addition, by appealing to CAS, there is now a great chance that key witnesses — namely Shane Charter, chemist Nima Alavi and possibly even Stephen Dank — will be forced to give evidence.

That would change the dynamic of the hearing before CAS and, possibly, the result.

Before the matter was heard by the AFL Tribunal, an application was made by ASADA to the Victorian Supreme Court for an order requiring Charter and Alavi to give evidence. The application relied on the Commercial Arbitration Act applying to the tribunal hearing because that Act of Parliament gives the Supreme Court power to force any citizen to give evidence in appropriate arbitrations. The court knocked back the application and the tribunal hearing went ahead without the evidence.

But it would seem — even just based on the name of the Court of Arbitration for Sport — that another application to the Supreme Court is more likely to be successful. And if it is, the game changes.

Of course, for the Essendon players, even when a decision is known, the saga might not be over because there could be a ban to be served.

And that ban could be up to two years — less the four or five months already served.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/opinion/supreme-court-key-to-appeal/story-fni0ffsx-1227353995977

Subpoena away WADA. Subpoena away. That action would all but prove the players defence for them.

Charter and Alavi will be great witnesses. All of those wonderful articules in which they said that they refused to play ball because they were being misrepresented and not being able to tell what they considered to the 'the full story'. Not to mention that Charter's life is almost certainly in jeopardy because of links to the underworld who will not want him explaining anything that he is doing, so he is not going to give any positive evidence.

And Dank, he is going to incriminate himself at this late stage? Please.

If these people are as dishonest and untrustworthy as we are being lead to believe does WADA really think that they would not be dishonest in the witness box to save their respective skins? It's not perjury because one side doesn't like the answer, it would need to be proved (though the notion of proof does not seem to be one that WADA and its minions are really that familiar with).
 
Last edited:

BrunoV

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 5, 2009
Posts
14,842
Likes
18,190
AFL Club
Essendon
No argument from me. As I've said too often already, the 34 players have been crucified by process. Whether they are ultimately found guilty or not guilty, the punishment has already exceeded any 'crime' they might have committed.

I was talking about FFA. They don't have the Australia wide infrastructure or the quality of product. It's a very expensive exercise to replace the AFL as an administrator of the public money that it receives (because much more money than is being spent will be needed to bring Soccer to that level).
 

Dan Cooper

Victory Salute
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Posts
8,071
Likes
4,801
Location
Red Corner
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Boxing
I was talking about FFA. They don't have the Australia wide infrastructure or the quality of product. It's a very expensive exercise to replace the AFL as an administrator of the public money that it receives (because much more money than is being spent will be needed to bring Soccer to that level).
Underestimate soccer at your peril. The AFL now have a very healthy respect for their growing rival. But this isn't the place to launch into an AFL vs Soccer debate.
 

BrunoV

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 5, 2009
Posts
14,842
Likes
18,190
AFL Club
Essendon
Underestimate soccer at your peril. The AFL now have a very healthy respect for their growing rival. But this isn't the place to launch into an AFL vs Soccer debate.

It's not a question of underestimating soccer.

There would be a need to for an investment of millions and millions of dollars required to develop the infrastructure. The government can't afford to to spend the sort of money it would take just because it doesn't want to lose the chance to bid for the Olympics.
 

IriDiuM

Long-term Lurker
Joined
May 27, 2007
Posts
362
Likes
183
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
Are they implying that the AFL tribunal members are either incompetent or biased?

Why have they disallowed the players to use David Grace? Is WADA allowed to use the same QCs? If so, why?

Why is the CAS adjudicators viewed as being so much more knowledgeable than those on the AFL tribunal?
Grace will be asked to recuse himself because he is a CAS arbitrator himself. While he obviously has a vested interest in this case so he will not be one of the 3 chosen arbitrators in this case, he is also not able to represent anyone CAS hearings. He can still advise them and their replacement representative, however.
 

rumply

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 11, 2002
Posts
16,734
Likes
16,355
Location
Under Her Eye
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Iggles, 76ers
WADA’s appeal to place more faith in Dank’s word
http://m.theaustralian.com.au/sport...th-in-danks-word/story-e6frg7t6-1227353992603

To understand why the World Anti-Doping Agency is appealing the case against 34 current and former Essendon players you need to go to back to Windy Hill and the end of the 2012 pre-season, when this mess really got started.

Suki Hobson, a weights coach who came to the club as part of Dean Robinson’s new high-performance team, is feeling run down. Stephen Dank, a sports scientist who previously worked with Robinson at NRL club Manly and more recently the Gold Coast Suns, suggests she try a shot of Hexarelin. Hobson agrees. She takes a vial home and administers it for a few weeks before deciding it is having no effect.

A year later, when Hobson is interviewed by investigators from the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority, she openly admits to taking Hexarelin, although she says she didn’t know at the time it was banned by WADA.

There is no dispute that Hexarelin, a growth hormone-releasing peptide, is a banned substance. There is no dispute that Dank, who was employed by Essendon on a one-year contract, was covered by the AFL anti-doping policy at the time he supplied a little glass vial labelled Hexarelin to Hobson. It appears a clear case of trafficking a banned substance.


The AFL tribunal which heard the case against Dank and the Essendon players decided it wasn’t. Its reasons for judgment against Dank handed down last month explain why.

Like the Thymosin peptide sourced from China at the end of 2011 by drug importer Shane Charter, prepared by pharmacist Nima Alavi and allegedly administered to Essendon players by Dank, the providence of the Hexarelin-labelled vials Dank kept in his fridge at Windy Hill is unclear.

The only documents ASADA provided to the tribunal relating to Hexarelin were an invoice sent from Alavi’s pharmacy to Essendon in error and a dodgy certificate of analysis that ASADA’s own scientific expert doubts.

“There are no records, apart from the tax invoice from Como, of the compounding or dispensing of Hexarelin to Mr Dank,” the tribunal notes. “Apart from the certificate which the tribunal has referred to, there is no evidence of any analysis being conducted on a substance said to be Hexarelin. In particular, there is no evidence of any analysis of the substance labelled Hexarelin in the vial observed by Ms Hobson.”

It was satisfied Dank gave Hobson what he believed was Hexarelin. As a consequence, he was found guilty of attempted trafficking. However, it was not satisfied that the substance actually was Hexarelin. Not in the case of Suki Hobson. Not in the cases of Sue Anderson and Paul Turk, two other Essendon staff members given something purported to be Hexarelin by Dank.

When WADA reviewed the evidence gathered by ASADA and the reasons of the AFL tribunal, the Hexarelin episode and others like it convinced the global anti-doping body that a rehearsing was needed before the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

If a tribunal cannot be satisfied that someone who admits to taking Hexarelin from a vial marked Hexarelin after being told by a sports scientist it is Hexarelin has indeed taken Hexarelin, the task confronting anti-doping investigators verges on the impossible.   The standard of proof required for an anti-doping offence is comfortable satisfaction. WADA believes the AFL tribunal demanded way too much satisfaction. A brief statement posted on the Court of Arbitration for Sport website makes this clear: “WADA requests that the CAS issue a new decision based on an appropriate burden of proof and evidentiary standards.”

As colleague Patrick Smith reported in yesterday’s The Australian, WADA will seek a rehearsing of the case against the 34 players, who were all cleared by the AFL tribunal of taking the banned peptide Thymosin Beta-4, and the case against Stephen Dank. Of 34 violations of anti-doping rules alleged by ASADA, only 10 were upheld by the tribunal chaired by retired Victorian County Court judge David Jones.

Although the tribunal’s reasoning in the case of Hobson appears odd, it should not be judged in isolation. The reasons for its decision against Dank and the reasons for its decision against the 34 players, although published two weeks apart, are intended as a single document. When read this way, the tribunal judgment reveals a strong streak of common sense and consistency.

The tribunal, once confronted with the murky, loosely regulated world of peptide dealing, Dank’s ineptitude as a sports scientist and the contradictory accounts of the two other elusive figures at the centre of this scandal — Shane Charter and Nima Alavi — decided to accept little at face value. In particular, anything said by Dank, whether to players, journalists, other club officials or private clients, was given little weight in the absence of corroboration.

As part of its case, ASADA accused Dank of administering Hexarelin to Essendon footballers. This relied on testimony provided by Sandor Earl, a former NRL player who admitted to taking banned drugs supplied by Dank, and Dr Peter Fricker, a respected sports physician and former AIS director who twice met Dank in Qatar during 2012. Both recounted to ASADA conversations they had with Dank about giving Dons players Hexarelin.

The weakness in Earl and Fricker’s accounts is they are based entirely on what Dank told them. In the absence of supporting evidence, neither swayed the tribunal.

ASADA separately accused Dank of trafficking a swag of banned substances by supplying a supplement drink to Essendon players which advertised Growth Factor 1, Mechano Growth Factor, Follistatin and Thymosin Beta-4 among its list of ingredients. When the Australian Sports Drug Testing Laboratory analysed a sample of the product, sold as Humanofort, no banned substances were detected. The drink claimed to be something it wasn’t. Dank was found guilty of attempted trafficking but cleared of trafficking.

Doubting whether a substance marked Hexarelin is in fact Hexarelin may seem overly sceptical but not once you learn that it has been imported from China with the original labels and certificate of analysis deliberately removed, and provided to Dank without any reliable documentation or analytical testing.

For the same reason, the tribunal was not satisfied that Gold Coast Suns defender Nathan Bock took another banned substance, CJC-1295, despite evidence from Dean Robinson that this is what Bock was given. Bock was given a vial purportedly containing CJC-1295 and syringes at Robinson’s house. Bock subsequently admitted to investigators that he injected himself with whatever was in the vial. Again, Dank was found guilty of attempted trafficking but not trafficking.

“The tribunal is comfortably satisfied that Mr Dank provided to Mr Robinson what Mr Dank believed was the prohibited substance CJC-1295,” the tribunal found.

“However, was the substance in fact CJC-1295? This is again a situation where there is no evidence of any analysis of the substance involved. There is no evidence as to the source of the substance.”

The tribunal judgment notes that you don’t necessarily need a certificate of analysis to prove a peptide is what it purports to be. Yet in the end, this is the standard to which ASADA’s case is held.

Of a dozen banned substances that Dank is alleged to have trafficked, the tribunal is comfortably satisfied on only two counts; providing Mechano Growth Factor to Carlton’s tackling coach John Donehue and GHRP-6 to a baseball coach. In both instances, ASADA produced reliable certificates of analysis supporting the providence of those peptides.

WADA hopes that CAS won’t be so exacting next time round, that it will be less troubled by the inconsistencies and evidentiary deficiencies in the case. Perversely, it wants CAS to place more faith in the word of Stephen Dank.

Well laid out piece by Chip & the last line sums it up nicely
 

Dan Cooper

Victory Salute
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Posts
8,071
Likes
4,801
Location
Red Corner
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Boxing
WADA’s appeal to place more faith in Dank’s word
http://m.theaustralian.com.au/sport...th-in-danks-word/story-e6frg7t6-1227353992603

Well laid out piece by Chip & the last line sums it up nicely
Interesting article and nicely summarized in the very last sentence >

"WADA hopes that CAS won’t be so exacting next time round, that it will be less troubled by the inconsistencies and evidentiary deficiencies in the case. Perversely, it wants CAS to place more faith in the word of Stephen Dank".
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

BrunoV

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 5, 2009
Posts
14,842
Likes
18,190
AFL Club
Essendon
WADA’s appeal to place more faith in Dank’s word
http://m.theaustralian.com.au/sport...th-in-danks-word/story-e6frg7t6-1227353992603




Well laid out piece by Chip & the last line sums it up nicely


Yes, WADA, it is really difficult to prove a circumstantial case.

It's worth remembering what it took to nail Lance Armstrong, eye-witness accounts of team mates who admitted knowledge of what they were doing and knowledge that Armstrong was doing the same.

Watch the WADA code fall apart if all that is required to convict athletes is proof which is basically at a standard of suspicion of impropriety.
 

Dan Cooper

Victory Salute
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Posts
8,071
Likes
4,801
Location
Red Corner
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Boxing
Yes, WADA, it is really difficult to prove a circumstantial case.

It's worth remembering what it took to nail Lance Armstrong, eye-witness accounts of team mates who admitted knowledge of what they were doing and knowledge that Armstrong was doing the same.

Watch the WADA code fall apart if all that is required to convict athletes is proof which is basically at a standard of suspicion of impropriety.
The evidence against Armstrong was, in the end, simply overwhelming. But it took innumerable witnesses and many years to get the case over the line.

There was an endless list of witnesses only too willing to testify against Armstrong, and those people were from all sides of the fence.

There are no witnesses testifying the Essendon players took a banned substance - not a single one - and their case could not possibly be more different than Armstrong's.

Saw "The Armstrong Lie" doco just recently and it is a must watch.
 

MightyDon

Club Legend
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Posts
1,198
Likes
1,830
AFL Club
Essendon
Yes, WADA, it is really difficult to prove a circumstantial case.

It's worth remembering what it took to nail Lance Armstrong, eye-witness accounts of team mates who admitted knowledge of what they were doing and knowledge that Armstrong was doing the same.

Watch the WADA code fall apart if all that is required to convict athletes is proof which is basically at a standard of suspicion of impropriety.
Lance also tested positive on a couple of occasions.
 

fishardansin

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 6, 2008
Posts
15,127
Likes
10,051
Location
coburg
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Australian cricket team
I don't even think they'd lose that.

The AFL is actually very influential and has a lot of clout publicly.

The govt pulls funding and they'd engage the clubs to start singing about the cash they're being deprived. The media joins in and the govt shit themselves about losing votes. Tugging on footy fans heartstrings is easy politically.
I agree. The AFL relies on Govt assistance to build the big stadiums. At the same time the Govt relies on the AFL to justify building large stadiums for events like Comm games so that they don't lie dormant.

We can see the new ALP govt trying to use the AFL for support with their new public holiday .. ect ect. The Govt needs AFL more than the other way around.
 

Dan Cooper

Victory Salute
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Posts
8,071
Likes
4,801
Location
Red Corner
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Boxing
Without evidence how can a bottle with a label out weigh a spreadsheet labelled Thymosin Alpha? You can't just pick and chose you need to back it up.
Perhaps that's why the spreadsheet seems to have conveniently gone missing AFTER Robson handed it to ASADA?

Interesting Bomber remembered the spreadsheet. Even remembered it was A3 size.
 

Mr Mojo Risin

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Posts
7,362
Likes
9,427
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Celtics, Colts, Renegades, Kings

George Washington

Premiership Player
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Posts
4,399
Likes
1,883
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
Huge respect for David Jones. Sounds like he has seen through all the bullshit and summed it all up logically and rationally to be honest.

The key here is they don't have a positive test. Without one the degree of proof you need to get the substance in the syringe in the player should be pretty high.
 

2one2

Premiership Player
Joined
May 30, 2012
Posts
3,441
Likes
5,224
AFL Club
Essendon

Dan Cooper

Victory Salute
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Posts
8,071
Likes
4,801
Location
Red Corner
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Boxing
Huge respect for David Jones. Sounds like he has seen through all the bullshit and summed it all up logically and rationally to be honest.

The key here is they don't have a positive test. Without one the degree of proof you need to get the substance in the syringe in the player should be pretty high.
Regardless of how high or low the bar is set, there needs to be evidence that actually completes and supports the chain of supply, and I'm not convinced there is.
 

tesla1962

Premium Gold
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Posts
4,577
Likes
5,255
Location
Lewes, East Sussex
AFL Club
Essendon
WADA’s appeal to place more faith in Dank’s word
http://m.theaustralian.com.au/sport...th-in-danks-word/story-e6frg7t6-1227353992603




Well laid out piece by Chip & the last line sums it up nicely
Agree that this does a good job of explaining some of the decisions.

However, it doesn't discuss the strength or weaknesses in the case further up the supply chain (TB4 making it to EFC and then individual players), which the tribunal chose not consider.

I suppose I am not sure that if CAS agree it was TB4 how much further work needs to be done to ban 34 players given the amounts involved and dank's other business.

Are WADA taking this to CAS knowing that they will lose but at least getting the early bit of the supply chain accepted for future non presence cases - is this view too tin foil?
 

Dan Cooper

Victory Salute
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Posts
8,071
Likes
4,801
Location
Red Corner
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Boxing
Agree that this does a good job of explaining some of the decisions.

However, it doesn't discuss the strength or weaknesses in the case further up the supply chain (TB4 making it to EFC and then individual players), which the tribunal chose not consider.
At the commencement of the tribunal hearing the 34 players and ASADA agreed that 3 "indispensable" elements must be proven for ASADA to succeed with a guilty verdict of the players having taken TB4 >

1/ That TB4 was procured from Chinese sources.

2/ That Nima Alavi compounded TB4 and provided it to Stephen Dank in his capacity as the Essendon sports scientist.

3/ That Dank administered TB4 to each of the 34 players.

Though logical, I'm not sure why ASADA would have agreed to the above, and I wonder if WADA will have to work to a similar framework??
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Posts
39
Likes
49
AFL Club
Essendon
I agree. The AFL relies on Govt assistance to build the big stadiums. At the same time the Govt relies on the AFL to justify building large stadiums for events like Comm games so that they don't lie dormant.

We can see the new ALP govt trying to use the AFL for support with their new public holiday .. ect ect. The Govt needs AFL more than the other way around.

You're right Fish. Look at what has happened in Brazil with the stadiums either built or upgraded for the FIFA world Cup.
Many unused or underused. Clubs , communities unable to afford upkeep.
Really when you look at it seriously they only have to charge Fox/Seven or whoever a extra few million and problem is solved.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom