I'm not one of those that has been pushing the "no records" line, and I've actually been pushing the "inadequate records" argument on this forum for years
On the content of the records, it's not a yes/no question. The audit looks at the details and the accuracy of the information, and the risk non compliance can cause
This means a non conformance can be graded based upon its severity and potential to allow harm
At a bar minimum, date and time of treatment, dose, medication, reason for treatment, and player and medical sign off should have been recorded for every treatment.
The reason for this is if an adverse reaction occurs with a patient, the doctor needs to know exactly what was taken, how much and when, in case it may be a cause of the reaction, or may effect treatment for it
This is why poor record keeping is deemed a potential reason for a work place being considered unsafe
Again, sorry for the intrusion, but I thought some clarification on this subject may benefit your discussion