Considering Ben McDevitt two weeks into the job said "I would like to find out about the experiment that Ziggy Switkowski was talking about," considering there are a bunch of loons right now on twitter sending links to WADA and ASADA of the Australian article where Hird says players lied, considering Dank's interview with McKenzie was tabled as hard evidence and considering that the "thing in the newspaper" was a series of published text messages as opposed to hearsay, well yes.
Particularly after Ben McDevitt has puffed his chest out about protecting sport from cheats. If Dank works for another club and then the word Thymomodulin comes up in his discussion ... it's less that I WANT it investigated and more I'd like an explanation as to why it isn't
Particularly after Ben McDevitt has puffed his chest out about protecting sport from cheats. If Dank works for another club and then the word Thymomodulin comes up in his discussion ... it's less that I WANT it investigated and more I'd like an explanation as to why it isn't
There are only 2 possibilities here.
Either
1. CAS is wrong when it says that Dank would never use Thymomodulin on footballers, and every time he says "thymosin" it means "TB4", in which case a basic premise in its judgement finding the 34 guilty is wrong.
or
2. Melbourne players used TB4, and there is a damn site more hard evidence, in the form of texts from Dank to the MFC doctor, to prove this, than there was in the case of the 34.
