- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Posts
- 1,397
- Likes
- 1,516
- Location
- The Red and Black Havens
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Manchester United
Wow ! - Do you realise this post represents the worse of the debate on the HTB - Posters are more than capable of forming their own independent opinions - Following your logic the new 'strawman' in any debate is 'your opinion has been influenced by the media.'
Anyway the next debate will revolve around an EGM - It's only a matter of time.
Anyway the next debate will revolve around an EGM - It's only a matter of time.
THIS is the issue with the current state of debate. Comprehension. I clearly stated I understand there are those who have formed opinions based on reputable sources, and I'm sure there's merit in their arguments. But I stand by my statement that there are a lot of people who either don't have the time, or aren't willing, to dig into this a bit more and form their opinions on sources other than the media.
Perhaps I misunderstood your post, but please don't twist my words. I'm simply putting forward what I believe to be the issue with a lot of the arguments against Hird. Obviously I want Hird to stay, and so therefore I accept there may be some bias in my arguments. But I certainly do not believe, and haven't indicated, that I think everyone who wants Hird to go has simply been influenced by the media.
