No Opposition Supporters CAS hands down guilty verdict - Players appealing - Dank shot - no opposition - (cont in pt.2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pweter

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Posts
12,691
Likes
15,689
Location
Right here, right now
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Central Districts, Detroit Pistons
Yep, I can accept 4 weeks for that.

But, I think an EO breach needs something like 12 games first offence.

I think 2 years is harsh on team sports where you miss alot more compared to athletics.
That statement by Hird and "THAT" quote from the Ziggy report seem to be what Hird and the club are respectively being hammered for (still).
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Mercurial89

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Posts
9,929
Likes
12,239
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
the NFL probably knows if it signed up to WADA they would be dishing out a good 2-3 dozen 2 year holidays every season.
But on the other hand the same ban for any drug is a bit of a stretch. A player from Baltimore got 4 games for failing to clear his medication (for ADHD I think) with the league. I was fully legal, he just hadn't lodged the paperwork in time and he was tested
Media over there is a lot different too, there isnt a lack of content to cover, so you dont get the same sensationlist journalism in regards to sport to graba headline or sell a paper. Of course it still occurs but the general feeling, at least when i was over there is very much a "who cares" type attitude when it comes to sporting scandals at least.
 
Joined
Mar 25, 2007
Posts
34,705
Likes
18,586
Location
Bottom of the pack
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Arsenal
I think Hird, Bomber et al. leaving in the event of suspensions is similar to a CEO resigning from a big company when an employee makes a massive mistake there. Not his/her fault per se, but he/she is the figurehead and has to go simply to show appropriate contrition on an organizational level.
 

Doss

Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 1, 2011
Posts
70,960
Likes
96,344
AFL Club
Essendon
Thread starter Admin #22,107
I think Hird, Bomber et al. leaving in the event of suspensions is similar to a CEO resigning from a big company when an employee makes a massive mistake there. Not his/her fault per se, but he/she is the figurehead and has to go simply to show appropriate contrition on an organizational level.
Bingo. It's contrition.

It's not necessarily about being turfed for their level of responsibility for the program, it's about recognising that players being suspended is as big a disaster as possible for Essendon as a club (let alone for the poor players) and that the consequences for those in the football department need to go pretty high up.

If players are suspended, I don't think some sort of defiant symbolic "**** you" to everyone in the form of keeping Hird/Thompson/et al. serves any good purpose, and would be entirely piecemeal and token in the context of the real disaster we would face.

With any luck, this is a bridge we won't have to cross.
 

TheFrenchCut

Premiership Player
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Posts
3,406
Likes
7,645
AFL Club
Essendon
The NFL are a very dodgy organisation (see their suppression of concussion research recently) but this is one thing they're certainly better on. The problem is that Australia isn't a big enough country in WADA's eyes for us to get away with telling them to bugger off. America is, and thus can. WADA threatens our government with exclusion from the Olympics if national sports don't sign to the code. They can't do that wirh Amercia, because the olympics without America would be a farce.
 

marky53

Club Legend
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Posts
1,064
Likes
427
AFL Club
Essendon
I don't understand where people are coming from on Hird "taking responsibility" for the supplements program.

A) not the coach's responsibility
B) looks increasingly likely to have been a WADA compliant program
In the 5th Feb press conference he said that he accepts full responsibility.

Lotta people still hanging onto that comment
 

cymarak

Go Gators !
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Posts
2,977
Likes
4,007
Location
Over it. All of it.
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
49ers, Gators
WADA threatens our government with exclusion from the Olympics if national sports don't sign to the code.
Seriously?

I find it hard to believe WADA would have any credibility whatsoever if it tried to, for example, ban our swimmers from the Olympics because the AFL wasn't signed up to the WADA code.
 

TheFrenchCut

Premiership Player
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Posts
3,406
Likes
7,645
AFL Club
Essendon
Seriously?

I find it hard to believe WADA would have any credibility whatsoever if it tried to, for example, ban our swimmers from the Olympics because the AFL wasn't signed up to the WADA code.
That's the threat they've used in the past. The government then forces the unrelated codes, NRL & AFL, etc, to sign up, threatening a withdrawel of federal funding.

Everyone makes threats down the chain.

EDIT: It was originally in a brendan schwab article that my phone isn't letting me link for some, typically annoying phone reason. Was from the Age. Should be easy to google.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Posts
10,786
Likes
17,750
Location
Margaritaville
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Liverpool FC
Moderator #22,112
In the 5th Feb press conference he said that he accepts full responsibility.

Lotta people still hanging onto that comment
I don't accept that Hird should take full responsibility.

I believe that he too has been betrayed by someone he trusted.

His stipulation was that everything had to be compliant.

He's the coach, he's not the sports medicine expert.

I look forward to him being back at our Club.

**** the Haters
 

marky53

Club Legend
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Posts
1,064
Likes
427
AFL Club
Essendon
I don't accept that Hird should take full responsibility.

I believe that he too has been betrayed by someone he trusted.

His stipulation was that everything had to be compliant.

He's the coach, he's not the sports medicine expert.

I look forward to him being back at our Club.

**** the Haters
I'm not saying he should accept responsibility, just answering the question which was where are people getting it from.

I loved Leigh Matthews coming out saying that as coach he had no idea what was administered to players as that was the role of other Lions staff.
 

60sbomber

Club Legend
Joined
Jul 4, 2011
Posts
1,732
Likes
1,868
Location
Frankston
AFL Club
Essendon
That's the thing for me, rines. How can the club have any shred of credibility if players are sitting on the sidelines while those who ultimately cooked up the idea of the program- as a collective- hang around?

To me, they can't.
I can't accept the logic here.
This seems to be saying that the players would be innocent victims. And because they suffer unfair consequences, those who were responsible for putting them in a position where they suffered those unfair consequences should be sacrificed as well, eventhough they too are innocent of any wrongdoing.
 

vaughany

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Mar 23, 2002
Posts
10,376
Likes
4,938
AFL Club
Essendon
Has anyone got a link to the Australian article/SEN audio where Patrick Smith went off the deep end in relation to Saturday's Herald Sun article by Robbo.
Apparently accused Robbo of being a puppet for Hirdy and basically Hird wrote the article. Accused Robbo of being the "ghost writer".

Patrick Smith has officially lot his marbles, time to give the media game away
 

84859300

Premiership Player
Joined
Nov 5, 2010
Posts
3,026
Likes
3,944
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Packers, Bucks, Pens, M's, Chelsea
I don't accept that Hird should take full responsibility.
Some others disagree. They see it not as Hird accepting 'full responsibility'...more Hird accepting some responsibility.

I believe that he too has been betrayed by someone he trusted.
There's no trust in business, unless you work with family and even then; that'd debatable. The governance issue has raised that there should have been many more checks in place by many more people for this to function correctly. The fact that we don't have facts x, y and z to slap on the table to nip the drama in the bud, is some of the main frustrations by supporters.

His stipulation was that everything had to be compliant.
You're right, there was an email that stated this. But there was also another email asking people to use their UN skills to keep Dr Reid at bay. This could be seen as ambiguous.

He's the coach, he's not the sports medicine expert.
Granted. But neither were Wallis, Hamilton and the rest. They have been put off for the poor processes in the club. People are questioning on how some go, but others stay. Falling on the sword can be honorable, but it can only hide sins of others for so long.
 

Doss

Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 1, 2011
Posts
70,960
Likes
96,344
AFL Club
Essendon
Thread starter Admin #22,117
I can't accept the logic here.
This seems to be saying that the players would be innocent victims. And because they suffer unfair consequences, those who were responsible for putting them in a position where they suffered those unfair consequences should be sacrificed as well, eventhough they too are innocent of any wrongdoing.
Not really.

If the players are suspended, then we'd need to accept that it's probably quite likely (yes, I know the whole ASADA burden of proof thing is rather problematic) that the players were given a prohibited substance- probably TB4.

In that scenario, my overwhelming anger would be with those running the program and its implementation, and those whose brainchild it was to implement in the first place. Even though they wanted it to be legal, they've employed people to implement it who weren't up to it. As said, in that situation I simply cannot see how the senior coach and senior assistant don't cop some of the blame.

What kind of message does it really send about Essendon as a club if the players are suspended while the instigators of the program wear no further consequences?

As Ben noted, it's far from uncommon in the corporate world for that chain of accountability to extend further than lines of demarcation of responsibility would initially suggest they should.

I'm still getting the impression some people aren't quite grasping just how dire and cataclysmic it will be if players are suspended.
 

60sbomber

Club Legend
Joined
Jul 4, 2011
Posts
1,732
Likes
1,868
Location
Frankston
AFL Club
Essendon
I am very disappointed with the (multiple) posters here who think that Hird and others should go if players are suspended.

As I have said before, what was done remains the same, irrespective of the outcome of the SC/INs.
The case against the players will be decided by legalities. Whether a tribunal accepts ASADA's assertions about what its circumstantial "evidence" means, and the burden of proof required etc.
We will never know the full story unless Dank were to come clean, which he clearly won't.
The outcome of those legalities etc in no way enlarges or diminishes what Hird, Thompson, Goodwin, Reid etc have done or are responsible for.

You should judge how you view their roles now, and not let the final outcome distract you.

If the players get off, it doesn't make anyone more innocent, it just means we dodged a bullet based on the legalities. If the players are suspended, it doesn't make anyone more guilty, it just means we got done on the legalities and some tribunal's interpretation of the rubbish that ASADA are going to put up.

In my view, Hird is innocent of all wrongdoing. He has the character, loyalty and competence of a leader that is rare, and not to be discarded, and the club owes him a huge debt of gratitude for what he has borne on its behalf for the last 12 months.

There is no way I can accept that we should have some sort of clean out, for the sake of appeasing the masses, or even for the sake of making a new start, when that would mean sacrificing those who have stood tall and done so much for our club through this crisis.

FFS show some solidarity and strength of character, and support Hird, Thompson and all those at the club who have steered us through this to the best of their ability.
 

caboose

Club Legend
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Posts
2,562
Likes
1,393
Location
At home
AFL Club
Essendon
I am very disappointed with the (multiple) posters here who think that Hird and others should go if players are suspended.

As I have said before, what was done remains the same, irrespective of the outcome of the SC/INs.
The case against the players will be decided by legalities. Whether a tribunal accepts ASADA's assertions about what its circumstantial "evidence" means, and the burden of proof required etc.
We will never know the full story unless Dank were to come clean, which he clearly won't.
The outcome of those legalities etc in no way enlarges or diminishes what Hird, Thompson, Goodwin, Reid etc have done or are responsible for.

You should judge how you view their roles now, and not let the final outcome distract you.

If the players get off, it doesn't make anyone more innocent, it just means we dodged a bullet based on the legalities. If the players are suspended, it doesn't make anyone more guilty, it just means we got done on the legalities and some tribunal's interpretation of the rubbish that ASADA are going to put up.

In my view, Hird is innocent of all wrongdoing. He has the character, loyalty and competence of a leader that is rare, and not to be discarded, and the club owes him a huge debt of gratitude for what he has borne on its behalf for the last 12 months.

There is no way I can accept that we should have some sort of clean out, for the sake of appeasing the masses, or even for the sake of making a new start, when that would mean sacrificing those who have stood tall and done so much for our club through this crisis.

FFS show some solidarity and strength of character, and support Hird, Thompson and all those at the club who have steered us through this to the best of their ability.
Brilliantly said. And absolutely correct.

One of the most extraordinary things to observe, as well, is that these people seem to think Hird hasn't already suffered any kind of penalty. Let alone an absolutely major one, both personally and professionally. All for seemingly having done nothing wrong anyway. (And for putting his arse on the line for the club, like no one has probably ever done before. And, what's more, doing so on the basis of shocking advice from the club in any case!!)

Gobsmacking.
 

vaughany

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Mar 23, 2002
Posts
10,376
Likes
4,938
AFL Club
Essendon
I am very disappointed with the (multiple) posters here who think that Hird and others should go if players are suspended.

As I have said before, what was done remains the same, irrespective of the outcome of the SC/INs.
The case against the players will be decided by legalities. Whether a tribunal accepts ASADA's assertions about what its circumstantial "evidence" means, and the burden of proof required etc.
We will never know the full story unless Dank were to come clean, which he clearly won't.
The outcome of those legalities etc in no way enlarges or diminishes what Hird, Thompson, Goodwin, Reid etc have done or are responsible for.

You should judge how you view their roles now, and not let the final outcome distract you.

If the players get off, it doesn't make anyone more innocent, it just means we dodged a bullet based on the legalities. If the players are suspended, it doesn't make anyone more guilty, it just means we got done on the legalities and some tribunal's interpretation of the rubbish that ASADA are going to put up.

In my view, Hird is innocent of all wrongdoing. He has the character, loyalty and competence of a leader that is rare, and not to be discarded, and the club owes him a huge debt of gratitude for what he has borne on its behalf for the last 12 months.

There is no way I can accept that we should have some sort of clean out, for the sake of appeasing the masses, or even for the sake of making a new start, when that would mean sacrificing those who have stood tall and done so much for our club through this crisis.

FFS show some solidarity and strength of character, and support Hird, Thompson and all those at the club who have steered us through this to the best of their ability.
Best post in this thread?
Spot on
 

Doss

Super Moderator
Joined
Aug 1, 2011
Posts
70,960
Likes
96,344
AFL Club
Essendon
Thread starter Admin #22,123
Brilliantly said. And absolutely correct.

One of the most extraordinary things to observe, as well, is that these people seem to think Hird hasn't already suffered any kind of penalty. Let alone an absolutely major one, both personally and professionally. All for seemingly having done nothing wrong anyway.

Gobsmacking.
It's not just about Hird. It's the entire football department, of which Hird is only a part.

And who is claiming he's suffered no penalty? Clearly he's suffered a massive one- a year long suspension and ruining of reputation.

But guess what- if the players are suspended for two years, then they're suffering an even bigger penalty. In some cases, it could well spell the end of their career.
 

vaughany

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Mar 23, 2002
Posts
10,376
Likes
4,938
AFL Club
Essendon
It's not just about Hird. It's the entire football department, of which Hird is only a part.

And who is claiming he's suffered no penalty? Clearly he's suffered a massive one- a year long suspension and ruining of reputation.

But guess what- if the players are suspended for two years, then they're suffering an even bigger penalty. In some cases, it could well spell the end of their career.
end of careers say what!?!?!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom