mattyc2422 said:
Thought Channel 10s was awful. Not enough interviews or focus on the Pattison house - that cameras are there, why not use them more?
You're being too kind.
It was downright ********ful. They've only had 3 years to improve it so I guess I'm being too quick to judge..
The first Richmond segment could've been edited so we didn't have the idiot doing the interviewing stumbling his way with useless talk and bulking it up. Fine though, it was a novelty having 4 1st round picks, ok give the Tigers a bit of time.
Then every club is run through at a disorganised pace with less details than I could've got picking up the morning paper's draft snapshot. Hardly any footage etc.
Although we had the positive of no Huddo, we instead got these twits either restating what Kevin Sheehan (the one bright light of the show) had just said or asking questions that generally had already been answered. More padding.
And then the piece de resistance - a cross BACK to the Richmond barbeque where we they suddenly had no time limits and spent what felt like an eternity talking ******** with Clinton Casey. Great. Not even a segment devoted to footage of the Tiger's new recruits or anything like that. Just administration ********talk. And then they come back to the studio and say "we've run out of time".
I thought their coverage in 2002/3 was poor but they have found new ways to shag it up. They make Sarah Jone's segments on Foxtel look like journalistic masterpieces.