Then why has nothing been proved yet?
Im not masking the truth, I actually want the truth.
I dont know if I can handle the truth but I want it nonetheless...
I thought the way that interview was handled out was proof in not-so-discreet code.
Go read the recent article on the Richmond website about a certain new recruit we picked up and you will understand the type of 'sayings' I believe were used throughout the interview.
In our example:
"not knowing anyone here has made it very hard to find any 'distractions'... I have had no 'distractions' so far and I'm focused on footy... I can't blame my mates but I had to get away and now I don't know anybody... I've grown up from my teenage habits now."
Sometimes they need to get a message out to the fans without saying it.
From what I heard on TFS the WCE knew exactly what happened and refused to say. They went on to say that he has changed, because of a life changing experience... meaning he is no longer on drugs.
Btw this is a rare case where he IS guilty until proven innocent (in the eyes of the public anyway).
Why?
He has papers that could prove his innocence.
He can release them to the public whenever he wants.
What does he do?
He refuses to show anyone.
Is that not obvious?
Also this is irrefutable evidence:
Mike Sheahan accused him of a drug overdose.
By law Mike can be sued for defamation unless he has cold hard evidence to proove he is telling the truth.
If this is a lie, Chad can and would have sued Mike.
But if he sued, he would have failed... can't sue for telling the truth.
Therefore: N
o law case = drug story is true.