Chad Wingard v Jake Stringer ?

[Adam H]

Righto champ. Stick with making baseless claims so you can get your rocks off over bashing the Dogs.

Keep defending your players with one eye. Stringer has to give the first option especially in finals.

 

[GreyWind]

Keep defending your players with one eye. Stringer has to give the first option especially in finals.

There was one time when Stringer should have passed and got caught holding the ball.
Bont blazed away once and missed crucial set shots.

Missing easy set shots cost us the game but whatever helps you sleep at night.

Also you never answered my question about Wingard, so is he selfish?

 

[Adam H]

There was one time when Stringer should have passed and got caught holding the ball.
Bont blazed away once and missed crucial set shots.

Missing easy set shots cost us the game but whatever helps you sleep at night.

Also you never answered my question about Wingard, so is he selfish?

He is but not as selfish as Stringer.

 

[Masqualero]

Right now - Wingard
Potential - Stringer
Who I'd pick - 50/50 but if I had to choose, I would go Stringer.

 

[Bardo State]

Wingard will eventually be in the top few players in the competition in my opinion. I don't see that happening with Stringer even though he is very good.

 

[windyhill]

Stringer is good to watch, I just get the feeling that he's going to crash and burn.

 

[askdotcom]

Stringer is good to watch, I just get the feeling that he's going to crash and burn.

exactly the same as me, i feel if he gets a bad injury he could lose that burst he has which will then leave him just a good player.

 

[TheHoneyBadger]

Stringer is still recovering from a bad injury as it is.

Suffered a horrifically broken leg in 2011 (I won't post the picture, we've all seen it enough, and if you haven't, Google it) while playing for the Pioneers, and as recently as this year said he was another two pre-seasons away from getting his endurance and full pace back.

Besides, every player in the AFL is only a bad injury away from being limited for the rest of their career, that's not exclusive to Stringer.

 

[Wetdog]

Both awesome. But I'll pick Stringer because I'm biased.

 

[DaVillaBlues]

Well both were rightfully named in the AA team tonight, you take Adam H's nonsensical gibberish out of this thread, its a robust discussion.

Would love both at Carlton

 

[King Bont]

Bump.
Who's gonna have a bigger year ?

 

[HeHateMe]

Wingard

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk

 

[Oraaaaazio]

The Chad

 

[Elite Master]

Wingard quite comfortably IMO. Stringer is good no doubt, but I think he gets a little overatted on here.

 

[eth-dog]

Wingard for me but Stringer is a beast.

 

[schmuttt]

Wingard gets a bit underrated on here IMO, he is ahead of Stringer at this stage.

 

[go you pups]

Wingard gets a bit underrated on here IMO, he is ahead of Stringer at this stage.

Judging by this thread he isn't

Don't get the Wines hype though as they get brought up a lot together.

Also, are people picking Wingard to have a better year because of the runs on the board/safe option etc? Just curious

 

[Gosha]

Stringer. So much more versatile.

 

[loki04]

Stringer.

 

[Theo X]

Stringer and easily.

 

[RedWhite&Blue]

It's unfair on Wingard to be compared to Stringer.

 

[Elite Master]

It's unfair on Wingard to be compared to Stringer.

Stringer is overrated.

 

[Sando22]

Real tough.
Wingard by a whisker due to a few more banked credits but both stars!

 

[Moist Biscuit]

Stringer but Chad is awesome as well.

 

[Cadillac]

This one is tough because both are so dominant but very different.