Champion Data: Josh Kennedy, Bosk, Cotchin & Hawkins are NOT Elite.

Which team has been most embarrassed by Champion Data's assessment?

  • Essendon*, ZERO elite players

  • Geelong, 3 elite.. biggest drop in the past 5 years

  • Poort, 2 elite despite pretentious puffer premiership predictions

  • Richmond, 0 elite during September

  • Adelaide, 3 elites less than last year

  • Jack Watts will join the list in 2016. Intercept marking bitches, deal with it.


Results are only viewable after voting.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

dank420_

Senior List
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Posts
239
Likes
483
Location
Coogee
AFL Club
Essendon

Mitchell54

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 6, 2013
Posts
8,703
Likes
5,545
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Sixers, Exers, GWS Womens
WAIT!! Hold on guys!! wait up a minute!!!
take a deep breath.

Mitchell wasn't flipping elite! He has been one of the most bloody elite players for the past 10 years!!
How long do you have to be one of the best players in the league for to get 'elite' status!!!

This champion data is absolute rubbish!!

rant over.
 

STP18

Cancelled
Joined
May 4, 2013
Posts
6,684
Likes
16,600
AFL Club
Geelong
WAIT!! Hold on guys!! wait up a minute!!!
take a deep breath.

Mitchell wasn't flipping elite! He has been one of the most bloody elite players for the past 10 years!!
How long do you have to be one of the best players in the league for to get 'elite' status!!!

This champion data is absolute rubbish!!

rant over.
Bartel > Hodge and Mitchell
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Mitchell54

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 6, 2013
Posts
8,703
Likes
5,545
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Sixers, Exers, GWS Womens
Bartel > Hodge and Mitchell
Bartel has been elite throughout his career. No doubt but he is starting to fall off the pace a bit.
He has certainly been better than Hodge throughout his career but he is about equal with Mitchell.
Mitchell and Hodge are both currently better than Bartel. Anyway.
The Champion Data system is wrong. it shouldn't even be looked at. trash it.
 

STP18

Cancelled
Joined
May 4, 2013
Posts
6,684
Likes
16,600
AFL Club
Geelong
Bartel has been elite throughout his career. No doubt but he is starting to fall off the pace a bit.
He has certainly been better than Hodge throughout his career but he is about equal with Mitchell.
Mitchell and Hodge are both currently better than Bartel. Anyway.
The Champion Data system is wrong. it shouldn't even be looked at. trash it.
Bartel was elite last year but Hodge and Mitchell weren't deemed good enough to make the cut. Therefore Bartel > Hodge and Mitchell I would have thought.
 

tucky74

Premiership Player
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Posts
3,742
Likes
1,046
Location
Yarra Valley
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Bartel has been elite throughout his career. No doubt but he is starting to fall off the pace a bit.
He has certainly been better than Hodge throughout his career but he is about equal with Mitchell.
Mitchell and Hodge are both currently better than Bartel. Anyway.
The Champion Data system is wrong. it shouldn't even be looked at. trash it.
Bart wins cos the three in five year rule.

Hodge drinks and smashes to many heads.
 

Mitchell54

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 6, 2013
Posts
8,703
Likes
5,545
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Sixers, Exers, GWS Womens
Bartel was elite last year but Hodge and Mitchell weren't deemed good enough to make the cut. Therefore Bartel > Hodge and Mitchell I would have thought.
Hodge was deemed Elite last year. Bartel is not deemed elite this year though. so Hodge and Mitchell are both currently better according to the champion data
 

STP18

Cancelled
Joined
May 4, 2013
Posts
6,684
Likes
16,600
AFL Club
Geelong
Hodge was deemed Elite last year. Bartel is not deemed elite this year though. so Hodge and Mitchell are both currently better according to the champion data
That was because Bartel was out for most of the year with a knee injury. Apart from that hiccup though it seems clear that the experts deem Bartel to be a better player than both Mitchell and Hodge, fitness permitting of course.
 
Top Bottom