- Dec 3, 2009
- 18,289
- 18,196
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Footscray Bulldogs, Williamstown
How's Honey been going in the 2's? Probably the closest replacement if he's in form.
I think he missed last week.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How's Honey been going in the 2's? Probably the closest replacement if he's in form.
Structurally though, it's a bit worse for them. Dahl's been our best (or maybe second behind Macrae), but another can step into his role and do it maybe 80% as well (let's say). Richmond are forced to play either old, broken Ivan or green, unready Ivan in the ruck role.Dahl out would be a bigger loss than Nankervis is to Richmond. I don't think Nank has been anywhere near the Tigers' best or 2nd-best player this year like Dahl has been at the WB.
Dahl out would be a bigger loss than Nankervis is to Richmond. I don't think Nank has been anywhere near the Tigers' best or 2nd-best player this year like Dahl has been at the WB.
I expect the dogs to kick 7 goals in total and 23 behinds.I expect the dogs to get first use of the ball and therefore beat us by 6 - 7 goals.
OK fair comment on Nankervis - I haven't watched every game. I accept the point about structure, but if there's a week he has to miss then this one isn't too bad. We have conceded ruck the ruck advantage all year, so Soldo might still do OK.Sorry to intrude, but Nanakervis has been top 3 in my view for us this year, he's a huge loss to structure as well.
And Conca has been in career best form as well, he is a decent loss with the form he is in.
Conca is a decent loss? He has an average of 18 disposals, 3 marks and 3 tackles doesn't put him near the top 100 in any of them.And Conca has been in career best form as well, he is a decent loss with the form he is in.
hmm so we have to kick the same amount of goals plus 30+ behinds...I expect the dogs to get first use of the ball and therefore beat us by 6 - 7 goals.
Conca is a decent loss? He has an average of 18 disposals, 3 marks and 3 tackles doesn't put him near the top 100 in any of them.
I'm not saying he's been bad, but having an overview of all his games, the West Coast game was good but apart from that the rest he seems to have just been there and not done much. Especially in a team that was dominating. What position has he been playing? How is he a decent loss?
I understand stats don't tell the full story. Which is why I'm asking you, how has he been important? What position has he been playing? Who would come in to replace him?Stats lie sometimes, if you asked them most Richmond supporters would say that he has been pretty important in the last few weeks.
I actually think he is hard done by, by the footy public. He has a lot of talent he just can't get a run at it (as evident by starting to play well for a few weeks and doing yet another injury.)
I understand stats don't tell the full story. Which is why I'm asking you, how has he been important? What position has he been playing? Who would come in to replace him?
Dogs rarely beat teams by that much as they struggle for consistency, will be closer than that.I expect the dogs to get first use of the ball and therefore beat us by 6 - 7 goals.
When you play a forward line without proper forwards your going to get close gamesDogs rarely beat teams by that much as they struggle for consistency, will be closer than that.