That goes without saying. Bit like Kohli taking a stump.Dont forget the token holding the ball free against
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That goes without saying. Bit like Kohli taking a stump.Dont forget the token holding the ball free against
Ah ..didn't know thatWasn't he the travelling emergency?
Brander coming in for 1 away game loss, only to be dropped the following week (Just like last year) has shades of Worsfold about it.
Give the kid a proper chance to show his wares and flat track a bit at home. Let him get used to this level.
What's the bet you see him randomly playing in defence for the Beagles next week. As if that's good for his continuity.
I think everyone acknowledges Brander is unlucky. If we had banked the 4 points vs Brissie maybe he would have been allowed to stay on but we didn't and I think the MC has done the right thing with selections.
Good summary. If Brander wants to stay in the side then he has to push Allen out, unless JK or Darling miss. Either that or he fills in as a ruckman if Hickey doesn't perform.I think it shows the MC's thinking a little as well, in regards to who the new players were replacing.
Waterman in for Cripps (obviously has now been dropped for J Smith)
Brander for JK
Allen for LeCras
So Waterman dropped to get more run into the side, Brander straight swap for JK (not going to win that one at this stage of his career). It's the nature of having a good side with good depth (at least in talls). Looks like he is first in line should JK, Darling or OAllen miss for any reason - but just one too many if he plays as the 4th tall. Hopefully we can get another few games into him this year (maybe moving Oallen to 2nd ruck opening up a spot).
That wouldn't explain Venables.Brander a bit unlucky but the reality is that he is not even close to being ready to play at this level. Development type players like him will get a game with injuries only. We have just won a flag and looking to repeat the dose one would think and gifting developing players games is not the template unless as stated injuries call for it.
That wouldn't explain Venables.
I like his intent and suspect he will become a decent footballer but we carried him for half a season and still are.
We were too tall.
That was obvious.
everyone except WCE match committee.
Venables is puzzling, someone with his pace and skills shouldn't have any trouble getting 12-15 possessions a game, without an in depth study it seems to me most of his possies are contested, he doesn't seem to have the game sense to find space wide or forward of the ball to pick up easy kicks.Brander wasn't playing forward, he's been played as a roaming wingman, so Smith would be his replacement. I don't think he needs to be better than Allen to get in the team, but there's other factors to consider.
The tall players can be fit and have a great top speed, but they never (or very rarely) change direction and accelerate like a smaller player, so they struggle to shut down a chain of handballs like Rioli and Cripps would.
Venables is physical I'll give him that, just can't find the footy enough. I hope that the older guys are directing him on field.
Riolis Uncle passed away.. Notice we wore 2 arm bands last week.
Rd 3 vs Pies
INS
GAFF
RIOLI
CRIPPS
OUTS
Simmo confirmed that Rioli wont play. Cripps and Gaff are definiteRiolis Uncle passed away.. Notice we wore 2 arm bands last week.
Rd 3 vs Pies
INS
GAFF
RIOLI
CRIPPS
OUTS
Thats the way Biggie, lets do this and win bank the 4 points and move onWe’ve got plenty run now and the big beared lad is back.
Cripps and Willie to come back soon and we’ll all forget that Rnd 1 even happened.
Season starts now campaigners
Simmo confirmed that Rioli wont play. Cripps and Gaff are definite