Remove this Banner Ad

Changes for Round Two

  • Thread starter Thread starter cats2rise
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

LOL. I don't think Byrnes will be dropped because they'll want his pace. I'm more likely to be incorrect about the Hunt omission and Taylor inclusion.

It think its becoming very clear that his pace is keeping him in the team,altho in true shannon style he did kick a few goals in the meaning less NAB cup, but a soon as its back to the season proper, Well he's shaving post's again :cool:
 
Just a touch early for that isn't it BDP?? Sounds like you're in for a Premiership Hangover tomorrow!

1st thing when your self employed its never to early ;):D

2nd thing, Thats a good idea, i might crank out the Dvd and go through it all again.... Thanks Rosso :thumbsu::thumbsu::thumbsu:
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Pretty good reasoning there.

In that case BDP.................cheers big fella!!

home_sprache.gif


:thumbsu::thumbsu::thumbsu::thumbsu::thumbsu::thumbsu::thumbsu:
 
gamble and tenace have been earmarked to play 10-12 games in the first 18 games, so as to be given game time
rooke will come in a fortnight

watch for nablett to be back by round 16

Are you being serious?! or joking around?! because this would be a good thing to happen
 
the team from the back
B T Harley M Scarlett D Milburn
HB D Wojcinski H Taylor A Mackie
c J Corey J Bartel J Kelly
HF S Johnson C Mooney P Chapman
F R Gamble T Hawkins M Stokes
R M Blake G Ablett C Ling
Inter Enright Selwood Rooke West

Assuming Hunt will be out and Ottens to miss.
 
the team from the back
B T Harley M Scarlett D Milburn
HB D Wojcinski H Taylor A Mackie
c J Corey J Bartel J Kelly
HF S Johnson C Mooney P Chapman
F R Gamble T Hawkins M Stokes
R M Blake G Ablett C Ling
Inter Enright Selwood Rooke West

Assuming Hunt will be out and Ottens to miss.
 
From the article in todays Herald Sun it appears unlikely that Ottens will play again this weekend. It also appears that he would have played if it was later in the year in what was considered a more important game. Just hope we are not being too clever by half...


Written and Spoken by K.Rudd of the Australian Labor Party
 
the team from the back
B T Harley M Scarlett D Milburn
HB D Wojcinski H Taylor A Mackie
c J Corey J Bartel J Kelly
HF S Johnson C Mooney P Chapman
F R Gamble T Hawkins M Stokes
R M Blake G Ablett C Ling
Inter Enright Selwood Rooke West

Assuming Hunt will be out and Ottens to miss.


Hunt is likely to play and Wojcinski is out for at least another 2 weeks with a ruptured tendon in his finger.
 
B: Hunt Scarlett Milburn

HB: Enright Harley Mackie

C: Corey Bartel Selwood

HF: S. Johnson Mooney Chapman

F: Gamble Hawkins Stokes

R: Blake G. Ablett Ling

I/C: West Kelly Byrnes Rooke

Em: Taylor Tenace Prismall

Out: Tenace
In: Rooke
 
B: Hunt Scarlett Milburn

HB: Enright Harley Mackie

C: Corey Bartel Selwood

HF: S. Johnson Mooney Chapman

F: Gamble Hawkins Stokes

R: Blake G. Ablett Ling

I/C: West Kelly Byrnes Rooke

Em: Taylor Tenace Prismall

Out: Tenace
In: Rooke
Thats pretty much spot on in my eyes mate , I would be very suprised if it turns out any other way.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I read in the Australian that Neil Balme reckons Woj is a chance? I hardly believe it but it'd be nice if true.

Still think they'd give him the week off even if he is about recovered, just to be 100%. That does seem awfully soon, given that his injury was supposedly four to six weeks.
 
I read in the Australian that Neil Balme reckons Woj is a chance? I hardly believe it but it'd be nice if true.

Still think they'd give him the week off even if he is about recovered, just to be 100%. That does seem awfully soon, given that his injury was supposedly four to six weeks.

thommo said he wont risk anyone who is not 100% at this end of the season

otto most likely will be out too

taylor might get a game due to their ruck setup
 
Sorry BDP, I wasnt home, but I had a sense that something was posted about Shannon Byrnes, so I got back as quickly as I could.

Yes. He is a spud.

hahahahaha !! I was wondering where you got to :D:thumbsu:

I read in the Australian that Neil Balme reckons Woj is a chance? I hardly believe it but it'd be nice if true.

Still think they'd give him the week off even if he is about recovered, just to be 100%. That does seem awfully soon, given that his injury was supposedly four to six weeks.

Hand injurys are a funny one, No doubt we would all love to see Wojak out there Vs the bombers,Hell knows we will need his pace,Hands can heal quickly under the right rehab,And i for one wouldnt be surprised to see wojak out there in one of thoes gloves that Glen Archer had, i think they were called an Amour glove ???? But protects your hand anyway..... i think even if wojak can apply some deffencive pressure he is still a value to out team.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom