Probably, he's got a good kick but then so did Lonie...
He might have had a good kick before he came to Port, but all I saw from Lonie was 50 metre shanks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably, he's got a good kick but then so did Lonie...
Amon was in the exact same boat 3 years ago. Now an elite wingman in the competition.Farrell has had plenty of chances and consistently fails to deliver.
Amon was in the exact same boat 3 years ago. Now an elite wingman in the competition.
Bonner exactly the same, was in delist territory, then this year prior to injury seemed a totally different player.
Bonner was at sea in the HB role, changed to a forward role this year, and is a new player.
Farrell seems lost in the HF role, put in the middle last week in the snafel, and boom! The guy looked elite.
Way too early to give up on him, like Amon, he just needs self-belief, and like Bonner, play him in the right position.
I love the idea of Farrell, but he’s got to get it together real quick.
Could be way off here, but he seems like one of those guys who has always been so technically-gifted he’s never had to go above and beyond and put serious work in to achieve his goals.
But at the top-flight level, obviously all that changes.
If he could build up his tank, and stay in the game for longer, he would be an outrageous asset.
Poor man's Stuey Dew.
Rockliff is out for 2 months with an MCL.
Yeah Drew can't be dropped. Just shift Powell-Pepper to a forward flank and also be a rotation mid.I don't think there's any chance Hartlett will be dropped.
I expect Frederick to make way for Bonner.
Boak in for Woodcock. It is Woodcock v Drew for me and Drew was very good against the Lions.
SPP needs to be pressure forward. He is a bit of liability with his disposal in the midfield. Also, when he in there with Wines and Drew, we are pretty slow in there. We need some balance with some guys that can run out of stoppage like Boak/Amon (Butters and Rozee).Yeah Drew can't be dropped. Just shift Powell-Pepper to a forward flank and also be a rotation mid.
SPP needs to be pressure forward. He is a bit of liability with his disposal in the midfield. Also, when he in there with Wines and Drew, we are pretty slow in there. We need some balance with some guys that can run out of stoppage like Boak/Amon (Butters and Rozee).
He should be, form has been woeful.I don't think there's any chance Hartlett will be dropped.
I expect Frederick to make way for Bonner.
Boak in for Woodcock. It is Woodcock v Drew for me and Drew was very good against the Lions.
Amon was in the exact same boat 3 years ago. Now an elite wingman in the competition.
Bonner exactly the same, was in delist territory, then this year prior to injury seemed a totally different player.
Bonner was at sea in the HB role, changed to a forward role this year, and is a new player.
Farrell seems lost in the HF role, put in the middle last week in the snafel, and boom! The guy looked elite.
Way too early to give up on him, like Amon, he just needs self-belief, and like Bonner, play him in the right position.
Yes, players that have zero weapons, and that dont give 100% end up going nowhere. We have had a few, as do all clubs. Now you might get sick of the Amon reference, but its a reality! Along with the flops, we have had a bucket-load of mid-draft project players that have developed really well, including Amon, AA players like DBJ, our current captain, and my favorite, Dan Houston. Some have come on quickly, but others need time & games into them, along with identifying their best position. Bonner in defence is a duster, as is playing Farrell on a half-forward flank. Go and have a look at his game in the midfield against the Eagles last week ... He was a different player, with his speed & kicking better utilized.Really sickj of people using the amon reference as to why to give other players more of a chance. yep it comes good for some, but on the other hand we have put a sh*te load of development into some who just went nowhere. So can go each way and should be taken on merit.
Really sickj of people using the amon reference as to why to give other players more of a chance. yep it comes good for some, but on the other hand we have put a sh*te load of development into some who just went nowhere. So can go each way and should be taken on merit.
This is what most of us would like, but we know it’s not what we’re gonna get, which is:Hayes 100% won't be called up. Listed in the SANFL side.
Bonner, Farrell, Lienert, McKenzie and Ladhams in the mix.
My picks based off this info.
IN: Boak, Bonner
OUT: Woodcock, Hartlett
Farrell sub
Yes, players that have zero weapons, and that dont give 100% end up going nowhere. We have had a few, as do all clubs. Now you might get sick of the Amon reference, but its a reality! Along with the flops, we have had a bucket-load of mid-draft project players that have developed really well, including Amon, AA players like DBJ, our current captain, and my favorite, Dan Houston. Some have come on quickly, but others need time & games into them, along with identifying their best position. Bonner in defence is a duster, as is playing Farrell on a half-forward flank. Go and have a look at his game in the midfield against the Eagles last week ... He was a different player, with his speed & kicking better utilized.
Sorry, I am going to keep using Amon as a reference for developing players ... whether it makes you sick or not!
So much anger and stubbornness in some people's posts. Im sick if it!!
No-one is saying otherwise. The point is that some people jump the gun and are too keen to write guys off before its reasonable to do so.
Was a sarcastic reference to quoted post. Not even close to anger hereStop getting angry!