Kyptastic
Premium Gold
Patto's out of the series with stress fractures in the back.
For the love of god, do not rush Pat Cummins over there CA.
For the love of god, do not rush Pat Cummins over there CA.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Carlton v Richmond - Rd 1 - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Blues at 73% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists »
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 1
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
That is a shame as he with the bat has done a better job than our batters. Well lets wrap him up in cotton wool and get him 100% fit for the Waca test.
Bird to come in.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I'm not surprised by that. Disapponted but not surprised. If we have to get most of gthe runs from the bottom half of the order, Starc will probably score more than Bird.I read that Starc is the favourite to replace Pattinson. Wtf? Surely Bird gets a go in the 3rd test!
Is there a reason guys like D.Hussey and Voges aren't being considered for the Ashes? They are already over there and have been aclimitised to English conditions for a while now. Couldn't be any worse than what we already have, and would at least give us some experience in the middle order. Even George Bailey would be worth considering.
Because Hussey averaged 23 (with a very late century) over an entire shield season last year.
Voges averaged 25.
Bailey averaged 18.
I think a return to obscurity beckons for Agar, at least temporarily. But I don't think Ahmed - a 31-year old with 16 first class games under his belt - is the answer. Lyon has to come in, surely?
Pattinson hasn't done much with the ball so another quick may get a go; not sure whether Faulkner or Bird is next in line.
Batting-wise, Warner may come in but I don't imagine that's going to solve anything; it'll just be replacing one set of technical problems with another.
Read an interesting article that pretty much put our poor test performance due to what's happening at domestic level. With all the domestic teams vying for outright wins teams have been producing pitches to get a result in 4 days with lots of wickets being taken. All this is doing is leaving our batsmen with no confidence when they get to international level and bowlers with an inability to take wickets on pitches that aren't doing as much.
It's very interesting when you look at the runs-fest that was domestic cricket in the 90's.
Read an interesting article that pretty much put our poor test performance due to what's happening at domestic level. With all the domestic teams vying for outright wins teams have been producing pitches to get a result in 4 days with lots of wickets being taken. All this is doing is leaving our batsmen with no confidence when they get to international level and bowlers with an inability to take wickets on pitches that aren't doing as much.
It's very interesting when you look at the runs-fest that was domestic cricket in the 90's.
I think that is a very weak argument.
It's not an excuse, but it does have merit.
What's the next pitch like, could you play 4 quicks? i.e. Faulkner and Bird for Patto (inj) and Agar (inj) and get by with Steve Smith.
Old Trafford is a spinners deck. 2 spinners (ableit unlikely) is more realistic than 4 quicks....

Watson - needs to make the most of his starts. Already to many un coverted 20's and 30's this tour
Rogers - The Yang to Watson's Yin. IMO theese two could work really well as an opening pair. Especially if Wtason converts his starts
Khawaja - Did enough at Lords to deserve another shot. Peeved he got out to that pie chucker Root but his 50 was solid
Cowan/ Hughes - Hughes brings nothing to the table for me if his not scoring runs. Had one innings of note where Agar despite coming in far later in the order overtook Hughes's score with ease. Warner a no go zone at the moment. If he cant score runs against Zimbabwe he wont score anything against England. Dont think they will have the guts to drop Hughes but
Clarke - Stats show that 5 is where he makes the bulk of his runs and I tend to agree. 4 or above is too high for Clarke and not because he isn't good enough but we need his stability in the middle order
Smith/ Wade - Depending what the pitch is doing i wouldnt mind bringing Wade in as a specialist batsman
Haddin - Can't fault his batting in the series. His glovework still a concern but
Agar - Borderline selection with Lyon close behind. Suffered the second test blues and looked like being a threatening spinner who will run through opposition middle and tail order bats. Surely his a better spinner than Root???
Siddle - Lion hearted effort again at Lords. Can't fault endavour
Harris - I'm just glad he seems to be fit for 2 tests in a row. Touch wood he can stay fit because he is a vital part of the bowling attack and proved that with a 5 for in England's first dig
Bird - Replaces the departed Pattinson. Hopefully it's Bird and not Starc or an Australian A rep. Potenially a damagiung bowler in English conditions
12th: Cowan or Smith