Preview Changes next week

[Moti]

Good ins IMO. I think we are struggling to stay in the race for the 2012 finals and these guys may give us a bit of stability.

 

[Jack Bradley]

Ah Sam Wright - I see we are bringing in the hard nuts we do not bat deep

 

[Jack Bradley]

Haha what a joke, let's continue to play the same players who have not done the job previous. How does Anthony and wright get named on the ground yet Jacobs on the bench, he better not be sub this week. How slow does our team look on paper wow

Welcome to a team that accepts mediocrity

 

[COOL-A-ROO]

*checks Centrebet account balance*

I'm going all in on Hawks -23.5

Smashville!

 

[murray wrensted]

Ah Sam Wright - I see we are bringing in the hard nuts we do not bat deep

One thing you can't question is his hardness, typical soft post from you. But hey you keep on supporting our boys!

 

[roospur]

Predictable changes as others have said. The speed and gut running of Hill and Smith is going to kill us. Least we brought in 3 plodders to stymie the hawks strengths! Brad is losing the plot at a rapid rate. Let's hope the boys have a crack, reckon Jacobs will have a blinder and cement his spot for the rest of the year.

 

[Flawed Genius]

 

[Juryduty]

Lot of red faces on here if We win tomorrow. Ecstatic but still red faced


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Flawed Genius]

Jacobs better not be the ****ing sub.

 

[Higgins2Waite]

I want one!!!

 

[Arthur Cloke]

I rate this side the slowest ive seen since 1979AD.

 

[Higgins2Waite]

Jesus christ this board is about to go into meltdown. As heaps of fun and juryduty have mentioned Scott's hands are pretty much tied at the minute. I could understand the anger if we had a full squad but the reality of it is we are far from it. Wright is a good in and will be given a job. Would prefer hine over mcmahon but who knows if he's 100% yet.

 

[The Dingrel]

Lot of red faces on here if We win tomorrow. Ecstatic but still red faced


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agree, but I can't see Anthony or McMahon being the difference. It'll be because boomer, spitter, cunners, dal, atley, Thompson, lachie, drewie, and Lindsay play out of their skins, and everyone else performs better than in recent history.

 

[Elite Master]

I KNEW IT!

FFS, we continue to go nowhere with slow average plodders like Anthony, Wright and McMahon clogging up spots. Those are some of the flattest most underwhelming 'ins' you could get! Hawthorn are going to expose and slather us so bad.

 

[shinboner spiggs]

Well we just knew it would happen. The most meh 4 changes you'll ever see. If wood kills it one more time it's an automatic exclusion and he just plays. We have a piss weak coach

 

[naturally north]

Jesus christ this board is about to go into meltdown. As heaps of fun and juryduty have mentioned Scott's hands are pretty much tied at the minute. I could understand the anger if we had a full squad but the reality of it is we are far from it. Wright is a good in and will be given a job. Would prefer hine over mcmahon but who knows if he's 100% yet.

Not so sure about meltdown, but surely the bottom of the barrel has now been scrapped.

Anthony- I'd play Harper. One will give you nothing the other may do something.

McMahon- the blokes finished, reckon he was enjoying the sun setting on an honest career in the VFL only to have him setup for slaughter tomorrow night.


Wright is just wrong

 

[dus]

Terrible statement.

Oh well. Off to pay my hard earned for rubbish again.

We've gone backwards.

 

[Mr_Nyah]

Brad "Wet Lettuce" Scott

 

[chubbspeterson]

Maybe Brad is holding his cards close to his chest and will make a late change.
No way Basti was going out after his "spoil of the week". Brad would've patted him on the back and said "Well done Ryan, nice to see u getting back to defend for once'" Probably wishful thinking.

 

[Elite Master]

Brad Scott is trolling us Big Footy foke, there is no other way to explain it.

 

[kelman]

If the changes instead were ...

IN: Hine, Wood, Harper, Dumont
OUT: Adams, Black, McKenzie, Ziebell

Then the board would be happy. It has nothing to do with the amount of changes.

So we want scott to send a message that you have to earn your spot, yet give a game to dumont (who got towelled on the weekend) and Harper (who has not fired a shot all year) while ignoring McMahon and Wright who were our two best?

Or are we just running around in circles, screaming and waving our arms hysterically?

 

[Juryduty]

Agree, but I can't see Anthony or McMahon being the difference. It'll be because boomer, spitter, cunners, dal, atley, Thompson, lachie, drewie, and Lindsay play out of their skins, and everyone else performs better than in recent history.

I think McMahon can give a good account of himself, he will play like his life depends on it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Mullett]

Whilst I agree with most of your comments, when we win this weekend you all must eat your words.. With no salt or sauce.... Yes Brad appears to be weak ass piss but when we topple the top of the ladder Hawks, BS will be a goddam genius.

In 24 hours I'll be finally seeing my beloved Rooboys live.. None of you sad motherfruitcakes can take that away from me.

 

[Benno_900]

So we want scott to send a message that you have to earn your spot, yet give a game to dumont (who got towelled on the weekend) and Harper (who has not fired a shot all year) while ignoring McMahon and Wright who were our two best?

Or are we just running around in circles, screaming and waving our arms hysterically?

The latter.

McMahon, Anthony and Wright are straight back out for Mullett, Ziebell and McKenzie next week. Quote me on that.

 

[The Dingrel]

I think McMahon can give a good account of himself, he will play like his life depends on it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/
I hope u r right, I like the guy, I like all the players,,,,just think he gets beaten one on one by most players,,,,either too slow for small forwards or too small for tall forwards, and suddenly that back line looks very pedestrian.