Remove this Banner Ad

Preview Changes & Preview Thread versus the clowns

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
What does Dumont need to get a game? I really feel for the guy and thought hes had something to offer in the last month. If we're going for a flag, why not play these mature age players with AFL experience? Same thing with Sam Mayes, I never understood why we never played these versatile players more often that you knew could be depended on to do a job.
 
What does Dumont need to get a game? I really feel for the guy and thought hes had something to offer in the last month. If we're going for a flag, why not play these mature age players with AFL experience? Same thing with Sam Mayes, I never understood why we never played these versatile players more often that you knew could be depended on to do a job.
For that matter why didn't Jay Nash, Darren Pfeiffer and Danny Meyer get more games at Port?
 
What does Dumont need to get a game? I really feel for the guy and thought hes had something to offer in the last month. If we're going for a flag, why not play these mature age players with AFL experience? Same thing with Sam Mayes, I never understood why we never played these versatile players more often that you knew could be depended on to do a job.
These are vanilla, break glass in emergency type players to plug temporary holes. In most other cases, you should be playing up and coming potentials that could nail down roles, such as Jones, Williams, Farrell, etc.
There's no future for Dumont in our side, he would understand that. He's likely quite chuffed to be paid so well to run around in the snafl
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

These are vanilla, break glass in emergency type players to plug temporary holes. In most other cases, you should be playing up and coming potentials that could nail down roles, such as Jones, Williams, Farrell, etc.
There's no future for Dumont in our side, he would understand that. He's likely quite chuffed to be paid so well to run around in the snafl
You mean vanilla like Riley generic as they come Bonner?

In the games Dumont played last year he showed composure and was decent going forward. All I'm saying is we've been rotating the same mature age players in and out (Bonner, Narkle) by rewarding their form in the 2s. Going off Dumonts stats this whole season, you'd think he'd at least get a sniff
 
What does Dumont need to get a game? I really feel for the guy and thought hes had something to offer in the last month. If we're going for a flag, why not play these mature age players with AFL experience? Same thing with Sam Mayes, I never understood why we never played these versatile players more often that you knew could be depended on to do a job.

Just the end of the road I think.

Don't think Dumont has put a foot wrong in the time he's been at the club but there's younger options that offer as much. Trent is a mid and we have some pretty good mids.
 
You mean vanilla like Riley generic as they come Bonner?

In the games Dumont played last year he showed composure and was decent going forward. All I'm saying is we've been rotating the same mature age players in and out (Bonner, Narkle) by rewarding their form in the 2s. Going off Dumonts stats this whole season, you'd think he'd at least get a sniff
Dumont is better than Bonner. Playthekids76 your thoughts?
 
You mean vanilla like Riley generic as they come Bonner?

In the games Dumont played last year he showed composure and was decent going forward. All I'm saying is we've been rotating the same mature age players in and out (Bonner, Narkle) by rewarding their form in the 2s. Going off Dumonts stats this whole season, you'd think he'd at least get a sniff
You do realise Bonner and Dumont play completely different roles, right? If we play Dumont it's at the expense of Rozee, Butters, JHF or Wines.
 
You do realise Bonner and Dumont play completely different roles, right? If we play Dumont it's at the expense of Rozee, Butters, JHF or Wines.
I'm sure he could've played the mead role v Carlton with much more effectiveness. From what I remember, he was on the wing for duurs in the games he played last year and was one of the better performers who didn't shit the bed
 
🤔 When did he do his knee? What round would we expect him to be able to play?

Not against the idea... Imagine $$ he wouldn't be to expensive (injury) and don't need to give up any draft capital

The added bonus is the crows getting upset 😈
If he leaves it will because he wants to return to Victoria,
A few Melbourne clubs have made enquiries to his manager.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

You do realise Bonner and Dumont play completely different roles, right? If we play Dumont it's at the expense of Rozee, Butters, JHF or Wines.
Our wings were hopeless last week X is not right and it is rubbish playing Wines on the other wing.
Wines strengths are as an in and under player, not a two way runner. Bergamn could be on the wing but we need his marking skills in defence.
We are playing for keeps, I would bring in Dumont to plays on a wing.

Not Bonner: both he and Farrell should never be in the same team, both outside players with a lovely kick but they expose us down back as neither can take a tackle (hence pinged for whacking the pill out of bounds).
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Losing this game would surely be a coach killer with the outs the croms have?
6 years ago we gave Hinkley a multi-year deal about a month after getting destroyed by the crows.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top