Remove this Banner Ad

Preview Changes: R11 vs Collingwood

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Whats the situation with Brad Crouch? If he is injured, I'd be inclined to leave him out for the rest of the year - particularly if we know he has an offer on the table from another club. We cannot afford him getting injured and that club pulling out, we need the pick.

Yep hammy. Would expect him to be at least 2 games away yet.
 
fogarty definitely has the talent but he needs to get more touches. I know it doesnt help with our garbage midfield but still.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

It's almost as though they've started watching our games

I think after the North game they've finally realized that selecting based on reputation and seniority does not get results.
 
It's quite amazing how the teams we are now fielding look somewhat close to the teams people wanted at the start of the year.

Schoenberg, Sholl, McPherson, McHenry all playing. Hamill would normally be there too. Kelly, Murphy, Atkins, Gibbs not considered
They finally, miraculously, might be realising their mistakes and working toward rectifying them..
 
Man, I'm a sucker, but with our changes and Collingwood's outs, I've thrown a few $ on the cows.

Getting vaguely positive, and it's making me uncomfortable.
Just seen Collingwood's changes, did they swap out their entire forward line?
 
fogarty definitely has the talent but he needs to get more touches. I know it doesnt help with our garbage midfield but still.

He's played 4 games this year - with a large injury gap, it will take him a while to get back up and running. Developing key forward generally don't get a lot of touches until they hit the 50 game mark and he's still only at 18. He will be fine, but don't expect a break out until he starts moving up to that 50 game mark.
 
Man, I'm a sucker, but with our changes and Collingwood's outs, I've thrown a few $ on the cows.

Getting vaguely positive, and it's making me uncomfortable.
Unless you took us at a line of about 60 then I'm afraid that money is gone.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Crocker very lucky.
I’m actually fine with that... we bought him in at the end of last year.. we have nothing to lose giving him games and seeing if he has anything... it seems to have clicked for Keays.. maybe crocker is only one or two games away from a break out game.. we dont know unless we give him a run..

would way rather see his name than mookay, atkins, murphy...we already know what they bring..
 
I’m actually fine with that... we bought him in at the end of last year.. we have nothing to lose giving him games and seeing if he has anything... it seems to have clicked for Keays.. maybe crocker is only one or two games away from a break out game.. we dont know unless we give him a run..

would way rather see his name than mookay, atkins, murphy...we already know what they bring..

100%, he's still an 'unknown quantity' in my mind. Give me him over any of those other 3 any day of the week.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

In a good side, I could see Crocker being good enough to stay on as depth for another year. He could easily carve out a few 1 or 2 goal games in a forward line that had decent supply. Given our current predicament however and the need to play the kids, I don't much see the point in retaining him.
 
Like the inclusions other than Hartigan. Hoping Hamill back out there in the next 2 or 3 weeks. Forward line better with McAdam and Stengle but one too many talls with Walker, Lynch, Himmelberg, Fogarty. Can't see us kicking a winning score with that forward structure. Would move McAsey up forward and play Walker down back and Lynch on a wing. Don't see the point in playing Mackay when he won't be on our list next year. Get games into someone who will. Saw Nick's presser trying to justify stuffing McAsey around switching him forward and back because of Tex and the inclusion of Fog. Tex shouldn't be stopping the development of a kid up forward who is the only player capable of taking a contested mark. I realise they want to get him to 200 games but it shouldn't matter where he plays to get to that milestone.
 
Last edited:
In a good side, I could see Crocker being good enough to stay on as depth for another year. He could easily carve out a few 1 or 2 goal games in a forward line that had decent supply. Given our current predicament however and the need to play the kids, I don't much see the point in retaining him.

What kids would you replace him with? Mcadam and Stengle both in the side already. He doesn't have a replacement waiting to hill his shoes on the sidelines.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Preview Changes: R11 vs Collingwood

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top