Preview Changes: R2 2021 vs Sydney

[Firewalker]

Roo’s obviously told match committee to go all in to make the 8 after that win against Geelong, Roo’s takeaway from round 1 would’ve of course been senior players get the job done.

Rushing Talia back next week off no pre-season as well now we’ve got a sniff of finals

 

[Vader]

Roo’s obviously told match committee to go all in to make the 8 after that win against Geelong, Roo’s takeaway from round 1 would’ve of course been senior players get the job done.

Garbage. It was blindingly obvious to anyone with half a brain that Mackay & Murray were the obvious inclusions.

Of course, having half a brain would require posters to be able to look beyond their own biases and see the real world as it actually is - not how they wish it would be.

 

[Firewalker]

Garbage. It was blindingly obvious to anyone with half a brain that Mackay & Murray were the obvious inclusions.

Of course, having half a brain would require posters to be able to look beyond their own biases and see the real world as it actually is - not how they wish it would be.

A 33 year old David Mackay is an inevitable selection not an obvious selection

 

[Golumless]

Mackay in? Yuck.

 

[Crows I Am]

We have nearly half the team with 10 games or less experience and people are getting annoyed about us replacing a senior player in Brown with another senior player in Mackay. We already have one debutant back there in Murray, I don't think its that big a deal that we chose Mackay over Worrell for the other spot. Worrell will get his chance sooner or later.

 

[dude316]

Well it was a fun season while it lasted

 

[Scorpus]

He's not replacing Brown, he's just assuming his best 22 position once more after returning from that nasty concussion over the pre-season

When Brown and Kelly are fit again, it'll be someone else making way

 

[Crow till I die]

A 33 year old David Mackay is an inevitable selection not an obvious selection

Not sure what all the fuss is about - we should be happy that the club is giving the rookie listed guys a go

 

[Vader]

A 33 year old David Mackay is an inevitable selection not an obvious selection

Given that we lost 2x experienced defenders, he's both obvious and inevitable.

 

[Golumless]

We have nearly half the team with 10 games or less experience and people are getting annoyed about us replacing a senior player in Brown with another senior player in Mackay. We already have one debutant back there in Murray, I don't think its that big a deal that we chose Mackay over Worrell for the other spot. Worrell will get his chance sooner or later.

Mackay isn't good enough of a footballer for his experience to be worthwhile.

He's good enough to be a medical sub, but that's more because there is no point wasting anyone else in that role.

 

[Vader]

Not sure what all the fuss is about - we should be happy that the club is giving the rookie listed guys a go

This team contains 9 players with less than 10 games experience, 11 with less than 15, and 3 with 0 or 1 games... and people are still bitching that a senior player is replacing another senior player. Some people will never be happy.

 

[dude316]

He's not replacing Brown, he's just assuming his best 22 position once more after returning from that nasty concussion over the pre-season

When Brown and Kelly are fit again, it'll be someone else making way

This is the way.

 

[Mutineer]

Rubbish, Mackay is the best option at this point in time given injuries and availability...

 

[Pugsley]

Mackay in? Yuck.

Agreed.

 

[Scorpus]

Don't know what people are complaining about, David Mackay

14

David Mackay

Age

37

Ht

181cm

Wt

78kg

Pos.

Def

Career

Season

Last 5

D

17.0

4star

K

9.2

4star

HB

7.7

5star

M

3.2

3star

T

3.2

5star

MG

315.4

4star

D

16.5

4star

K

7.0

3star

HB

9.5

5star

M

2.5

3star

T

2.0

3star

MG

265.5

4star

D

12.0

3star

K

6.2

3star

HB

5.8

4star

M

4.6

5star

T

1.2

3star

is a veteran 220 game defender. I, for one, am looking forward to him going head to head with Tom Papley

11

Tom Papley

Age

29

Ht

177cm

Wt

77kg

Pos.

Fwd

Career

Season

Last 5

D

14.1

4star

K

9.1

4star

HB

5.0

4star

M

3.7

4star

T

3.2

5star

G

1.5

5star

D

12.3

3star

K

8.9

4star

HB

3.4

2star

M

4.5

4star

T

1.5

2star

G

2.4

5star

D

13.4

4star

K

8.0

3star

HB

5.4

4star

M

3.4

4star

T

3.4

5star

G

1.6

5star

. He should easily be able to shut him down, what with all his experience.

 

[Pugsley]

Don't know what people are complaining about, David Mackay

14

David Mackay

Age

37

Ht

181cm

Wt

78kg

Pos.

Def

Career

Season

Last 5

D

17.0

4star

K

9.2

4star

HB

7.7

5star

M

3.2

3star

T

3.2

5star

MG

315.4

4star

D

16.5

4star

K

7.0

3star

HB

9.5

5star

M

2.5

3star

T

2.0

3star

MG

265.5

4star

D

12.0

3star

K

6.2

3star

HB

5.8

4star

M

4.6

5star

T

1.2

3star

is a veteran 220 game defender. I, for one, am looking forward to him going head to head with Tom Papley

11

Tom Papley

Age

29

Ht

177cm

Wt

77kg

Pos.

Fwd

Career

Season

Last 5

D

14.1

4star

K

9.1

4star

HB

5.0

4star

M

3.7

4star

T

3.2

5star

G

1.5

5star

D

12.3

3star

K

8.9

4star

HB

3.4

2star

M

4.5

4star

T

1.5

2star

G

2.4

5star

D

13.4

4star

K

8.0

3star

HB

5.4

4star

M

3.4

4star

T

3.4

5star

G

1.6

5star

. He should easily be able to shut him down, what with all his experience.

Breakout year.

 

[Mutineer]

Don't know what people are complaining about, David Mackay is a veteran 220 game defender. I, for one, am looking forward to him going head to head with Tom Papley. He should easily be able to shut him down, what with all his experience.

So who would you suggest for the role that wasn't in last week's team?

 

[Scorpus]

I mean surely we didn't bring in a 220 game player to play a defensive role on a 2-gamer in Errol Gulden. Surely we wouldn't do that. Which is why the Mackay-Papley battle will be so enthralling

 

[crows dude]

Mackay should be on for hinge as the medical sub not brown. Whose the third in

 

[Mutineer]

I mean surely we didn't bring in a 220 game player to play a defensive role on a 2-gamer in Errol Gulden. Surely we wouldn't do that. Which is why the Mackay-Papley battle will be so enthralling

The Errol Gulden that pantsed everyone the Premiership contenders Brisbane threw at him, that Errol Gulden?

 

[Scorpus]

So who would you suggest for the role that wasn't in last week's team?

I have no problem putting Mackay on Papley because Mackay is obviously good enough to stop him. It's a clear and obvious match up that makes total sense and will work

 

[Scorpus]

The Errol Gulden that pantsed everyone the Premiership contenders Brisbane threw at him, that Errol Gulden?

Oh shit, yeah that's right. Shame we don't have two David Mackays then.

 

[Mutineer]

I have no problem putting Mackay on Papley because Mackay is obviously good enough to stop him. It's a clear and obvious match up that makes total sense and will work

Nice deflection...

Now answer the question you replied to...

 

[Mutineer]

Oh sh*t, yeah that's right. Shame we don't have two David Mackays then.

Come on master deflector, who do you suggest from the players that didn't play last week?

 

[The Smith Revolution]

We won without him and Harto last week. This helps our Jason Horne endeavours obviously


Sent from my iPad using BigFooty.com