- May 7, 2007
- 5,109
- 6,047
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
So why with the late outs did Himmelberg not get a game.
They would have known who was under an injury cloud.
They would have known who was under an injury cloud.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
I dont think Keath was under any sort of cloud, he just got Burtoned.So why with the late outs did Himmelberg not get a game.
They would have known who was under an injury cloud.
Elliot would be the perfect replacement in this situationAs for Smith missing, we need a small to replace him rather than Elliot.
They never had any plans to play him regardless of injuries. It was a symbolic jesture to fans that want us to play youth as the season is over. They were also communicating to the player "train hard over summer" and we may give you a game next year when players have retired and when we inevitably lose players during the trade period.So why with the late outs did Himmelberg not get a game.
They would have known who was under an injury cloud.
And replaced by kelly....hello, Murphy ?Jesus Christ.
Is there some sort of rule where smith and Seedsman never play a game together?
Seriously it’s one of the other.
I’m guessing seed misses next week for Smith.
****!
Himmelberg played SANFL yesterday. Think the options were either Kelly or Murphy.So why with the late outs did Himmelberg not get a game.
They would have known who was under an injury cloud.
And replaced by kelly....hello, Murphy ?