Remove this Banner Ad

Prediction Changes Rd 13 vs Hoks

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The only way I can rationalise Gardners inclusion is that the MC think they can get better use out of Khamis if he's not asked to play as second ruck.
I'll never again try and rationalise the irrational.

That the MC cannot acknowledge the momentum that we get robbed of when an undersized Khamis is asked to play as second ruck. Just beggars belief. But not nearly as much as not swinging Graner into the role when he was being exposed by Chol and we had Lobb and O'Donnell in defence.
 
I'll never again try and rationalise the irrational.

That the MC cannot acknowledge the momentum that we get robbed of when an undersized Khamis is asked to play as second ruck. Just beggars belief. But not nearly as much as not swinging Graner into the role when he was being exposed by Chol and we had Lobb and O'Donnell in defence.
this x1000.

Also in the first half when Khamis went into the ruck it meant we had 1 marking player forward of ball. As soon as we got bottled up at half back it was a kick down the line to Naughton (lucky) or more commonly West
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Prediction Changes Rd 13 vs Hoks


Write your reply...

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top