Remove this Banner Ad

Preview Changes: Round 11 vs GWS

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

546243fa54238be7377056670093043c.jpg

The funny thing is I made one of these, according to my computer, in 2016

mEDnp7x.png
 
IN – Seedsman, Murphy
OUT – Gallucci, Poholke

Massive loss. Two of the youngest, most inexperienced players get the chop. Couldn't make this shit up.
That's because we haven't put up the white flag

Poholke in particular isn't at the level and Galluci has a lot of learnings , let's see if he can go rip an sanfl game apart . I'm doubting he can

Seedsman and Murphy are great ins

Fog stays
 
IN – Seedsman, Murphy
OUT – Gallucci, Poholke

Massive loss. Two of the youngest, most inexperienced players get the chop. Couldn't make this shit up.
The buck stops at the...
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

That's because we haven't put up the white flag

Poholke in particular isn't at the level and Galluci has a lot of learnings , let's see if he can go rip an sanfl game apart . I'm doubting he can

Seedsman and Murphy are great ins

Fog stays

Dropping even just one senior player isn't putting up the white flag.

These selections to me say we aren't fair dinkum about fixing the 'effort' issue
 
I would have dropped a 3rd but also dropped those 2 . The 3rd would have been either Sauce or Mackay . Prob Sauce

Look, my problem isn't that we dropped Gallucci and Poholke specifically. Poholke definitely deserved to go, Gallucci line ball.

But when you just drop young players these selections say "the fault for the loss is on the young blokes". When realistically it actually wasn't the young blokes that were abysmal, but senior players like Mackay, Jacobs, Lynch, etc.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

We are decimated by injuries. The guys that played on the weekend are the guys that you would be bringing in to teach lessons. Not sure why this is surprising.

Gooch unlucky, but Murphy also deserved a chance. I understand the optics of the two youngest players getting dropped for a team 100 point loss. But it’s not about this. We absolutely have to win this week. We are putting the best team we can pick out there. There is no chance to teach lessons to guys like Mackay this week. We are in the eye of the storm and it’s still all hands on deck.

Edit: not to teach lessons, but Sauce looks cooked. If it turns out that he is cooked and he costs us several games for these selectors to figure this out then that is incompetence. Surprised ROB didn’t give Sauce a rest. Will be pissed if he has another poor game.
 
You can only laugh and shake your head at this point :$

Are you shaking your head at replacing Poholke with Murphy?

Or are you shaking your head that we didn’t bring in Andy Otten for Fogarty?

Perhaps you are shaking your head at bringing back Seedsman?

We will miss Gallucci’s 7 disposals this week but I think we can cover this. Over the last 4 matches who has performed best; Gallucci? Mackay? Gibson (2 games)? Perhaps we can play Gallucci off half back and drop Kelly?

Is three players with 20 AFL games between them not good enough for you?

Since you are only happy when we lose I can see why you are disturbed that we are playing our best available team (and that may not be good enough).
 
Imagine poor Gallucci going into his match review.

Coaches: "Mate you had seven touches, 1 goal, 4 tackles and 4 inside 50s. That's not enough. You're not contributing. You're omitted this week"

Gooch: "But the ball was down the other end of the ground, Betts also had 7 touches and Fogarty just 9!"

Coaches: "Betts kicked 2 goals"

Gooch: "I had 2 shots on goal!"

Coaches: "Yeah but you missed one. That's why you're omitted."

Gooch: "The miss was why we lost by 91 points?"

Coaches: "There are many things you have to work on"

Gooch: "What about Mackay? Or Lynch? Jacobs was towelled up by Gawn. Are they getting dropped too?"

Coaches: "Nah mate. They have experience. And they know running patterns. And they train the bloody house down."

Gooch: "So the blokes who's job it was to lead the team and win the game in the middle are not dropped, while I played as a forward where the ball wasn't and get dropped?"

Coaches: "Yeah mate, that's right."
 
Are you shaking your head at replacing Poholke with Murphy?

Or are you shaking your head that we didn’t bring in Andy Otten for Fogarty?

Perhaps you are shaking your head at bringing back Seedsman?

We will miss Gallucci’s 7 disposals this week but I think we can cover this. Over the last 4 matches who has performed best; Gallucci? Mackay? Gibson (2 games)? Perhaps we can play Gallucci off half back and drop Kelly?

Is three players with 20 AFL games between them not good enough for you?

Since you are only happy when we lose I can see why you are disturbed that we are playing our best available team (and that may not be good enough).

:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Drop just one senior player who failed, to send a message that a 91 point loss where senior players didn't put in the required effort isn't acceptable. Simple. We didn't do it.

But sure, the problem is we didn't bring in Otten and brought back Seedsman. That's exactly what I meant.
 
When we're getting beaten at the start of a game, would the senior players be thinking:

****! This could be my career on the line here. Better absolutely bust my arse to help us get back in this. Would rather lose my right arm than lose my spot.

Or are they thinking:

Gee! This isn't like us. Not our day. Happens sometimes I guess. Event not a trend. We'll do better next time.
 
Right changes in my opinion, although at some stage I think we need 3 genuine tall's back with Keath being the pacy, marking swingman. Poholke may well be a player but at this stage is not what is required as he has not done enough. Murphy at this stage deserves another go over Gooch who will no doubt be a player.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

When we're getting beaten at the start of a game, would the senior players be thinking:

****! This could be my career on the line here. Better absolutely bust my arse to help us get back in this. Would rather lose my right arm than lose my spot.

Or are they thinking:

Gee! This isn't like us. Not our day. Happens sometimes I guess. Event not a trend. We'll do better next time.

Pyke preaches the second line of thinking.
 
Blinder is a bit of a stretch, he had a "handy" game with several moments where he showed the eye opening talent he possesses with 2 centre clearances in particular that were Dangerfield like when he broke clear put the jets on and booted long goals, the talent is there in spades but he needs to do more.

Did he fail to pick up a ball and fall over in the defensive goal square?

Surely Hampton can do just as bad, but also add a lot more than that.

(Not naming names)
 
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Drop just one senior player who failed, to send a message that a 91 point loss where senior players didn't put in the required effort isn't acceptable. Simple. We didn't do it.

But sure, the problem is we didn't bring in Otten and brought back Seedsman. That's exactly what I meant.
Better to make a statement than win a crucial game.

Ahhh welll, trolls gotta troll.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Preview Changes: Round 11 vs GWS

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top