
- Oct 17, 2010
- 4,434
- 7,133
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Washington Nationals, Black Ducks
In at least three from Peel, obviously Kuek. It's rebuilding time again.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Supercoach Rd 19 Rd19 SC Talk - New badges! - Trade Talk - Carnage! - Capt/VC - BigFooty Cup – Round 3 ,//, AFLW Fantasy 2025! ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 19 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Captains
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Yeah nah Kuek isn't coming in. Amiss, Treacy, and Jackson all stay in. There's no place for him next week with Darcy back.In at least three from Peel, obviously Kuek. It's rebuilding time again.
It’s really not.In at least three from Peel, obviously Kuek. It's rebuilding time again.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
First thing.
* Henry off. There’s nothing there, there’s nothing special.
Second- NOD should get a spell.
Now something has to be said about Fyfe and Switkowski. Fyfe has struggled big time. Up forward he’s slow and in the middle he relies so much on his ball winning that he doesn’t run both ways.
Switkowski hasn’t kicked goals for weeks. 9 goals from 12 games isn’t elite.
He won’t be dropped, but he just doesn’t do enough apart from elite pressure
Banfield, Hughes, Clark, Ryan have been horrendous the last two weeks.
In: Darcy, Worner, Erasmus, Frederick
Out: Henry, NOD, Fyfe, Banfield
OUT HENRY IN WORNER
Lol ****ing of course it's gonna rain. Why does it feel like every wet weather game we've played in recent times has been in Perth. Thought melbourne was supposed to have the shitty weather.Not sure Kuek should come in. Forecast is for rain on Saturday.
We're gonna need ground level players.
If it's wet then this mob would do better than the mighty freo footy clubNot sure Kuek should come in. Forecast is for rain on Saturday.
We're gonna need ground level players.
The ground we normally play at in Melbourne has a roofLol ******* of course it's gonna rain. Why does it feel like every wet weather game we've played in recent times has been in Perth. Thought melbourne was supposed to have the shitty weather.
NOD isn't even fit. No idea why he's in the team tbh. Ask JLSo why is he out but NOD gets to keep his spot after being far worse all season?
Why?Henry? Really?
So predictable.
Would happily take out both NOD and Henry for Worner and Aish if fit, or bring in Wilson.So why is he out but NOD gets to keep his spot after being far worse all season?
I genuinley forget Colyer still exists.If we are picking WAFL players why wouldn't we consider Colyer, given he actually played HF/Wing as opposed to Worner, and had more possessions and 2 goals also? Neither are also very tall so it is not like there is a height aspect either, and Colyer brings speed and experience as well.
Obviously getting Darcy back would be big for us. Aish and Frederick would also be nice in terms of experience, even if Frederick was not in the best of form.
- Darcy -> Johnson (rest) or Treacy
- Aish -> O'Driscoll
- Frederick -> Banfield
I genuinley forget Colyer still exists.
Also I'll be very pissed off if they take out Treacy when Darcy comes back. We scored 100+ every game we played that forward structure. It works.
I thought Treacy was doing really well even when he wasn't touching the ball. Halved a lot of contests. Does a lot better than Sturt around the ground. Also reckon Treacy would be much better in the wet than sturt.Sure understand, but just playing with how I think it could go, I think that could be an option that the selectors consider because of the forecast weather + Treacy's quietness in that game (although I thought he was marking pretty well when he got near it).
Because there was about 15 other players who were a lot worse than him.Why?
He hasn’t shown anything, and the last two weeks he doesn’t deserve AFL time.
Suddenly he has a ‘good’ game in a 70 point loss he’s in? No.
Sturt isnt competing with Treacy. He is competing with Banfield, Freddie, Switta etcI thought Treacy was doing really well even when he wasn't touching the ball. Halved a lot of contests. Does a lot better than Sturt around the ground. Also reckon Treacy would be much better in the wet than sturt.
He is. He would be playing tall along with Amiss and Jackson. Freddie, Switta, Walters, Schultz is already 4 smalls. We need someone who will play third and halve contests. Treacy plays that role much better than Sturt does. It's no coincidence that we looked our best with that set up (switching out Walters/Switta/Freddie whoever was injured each of those weeks).Sturt isnt competing with Treacy. He is competing with Banfield, Freddie, Switta etc