Opinion Changes Round 23 Vs Hawks

[GWeagles]

So just so we are clear; your implying Barrass ddint deserve to be dropped even after ******* up for 3 goals and literally costing us the game.

Nah, fu** that

One poor game. He is allowed that.

 

[The wily weagle]

How about we just pick our best available side?

SO you're implying after this week's effort, no changes?

 

[Candiru]

So just so we are clear; your implying Barrass ddint deserve to be dropped even after ******* up for 3 goals and literally costing us the game.

Nah, fu** that

Is Barrass best 22?

 

[The wily weagle]

One poor game. He is allowed that.

And if that game was a grand final?

 

[The wily weagle]

Is Barrass best 22?

Naturally. That's legit comical

 

[Candiru]

SO you're implying after this week's effort, no changes?

You know what's really dumb?

Starting sentences with "so you're implying" before simply putting words in people's mouths. I'll tell you what I think. No need to read between the lines.

I assume there will be changes. Either forced by injury or because Schofield and Duggan are fit and are selected accordingly.

 

[TheGhostOfJohnBelushi]

New rule: If you claim to be an Eagles fan and you want a player included or dropped, then you need to spell his name correctly.

*Except if his name is Marsden.

 

[GWeagles]

And if that game was a grand final?

We'd lose. If we make a GF and lose I certainly won't be lining up a firing squad. He is one of the best defenders in the competition. No replacement will be a upgrade on what he is likely to bring next week on what is forecast to be a dry day.

 

[Candiru]

Naturally. That's legit comical

So we pick our best available side, which you agree includes Barrass.

 

[The wily weagle]

You know what's really dumb?

Starting sentences with "so you're implying" before simply putting words in people's mouths. I'll tell you what I think. No need to read between the lines.

I assume there will be changes. Either forced by injury or because Schofield and Duggan are fit and are selected accordingly.

You have actually diverted the question

So I put it to you direct; do you believe, based on today's performance, nobody should be dropped?

 

[Tugga27]

How about we just pick our best available side?

Are you serious?

The masses on here want blood.
Someone has to pay.

 

[Candiru]

You have actually diverted the question

So I put it to you direct; do you believe, based on today's performance, nobody should be dropped?

I believe people will be dropped because Schofield and Duggan should be ready to go.

How much more directly can I say it?

 

[Biggie]

Are you serious?

The masses on here want blood.
Someone has to pay.

Drop Masten

I don’t give a shit that he’s not in the senior side just ****ing drop him.

 

[TheGhostOfJohnBelushi]

Drop Masten

I don’t give a s**t that he’s not in the senior side just ******* drop him.

Bring him in and make him a late out. That'll teach him.

 

[WCErevival]

Probably be Duggan for Hutchings. Nelson to play as a defensive mid.

 

[Tugga27]

So just so we are clear; your implying Barrass ddint deserve to be dropped even after ******* up for 3 goals and literally costing us the game.

Nah, fu** that

I'm not implying it, I'm saying it.

You don't drop a player who has a bad game or two.
You back him in that he won't let you down when it counts.

It's obvious you want a scapegoat.

 

[Cuzz09]

They'll pick the best available side.

Interesting to see if Hawks play Roughy?

On SM-G925I using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[The wily weagle]

You have actually diverted the question

So I put it to you direct; do you believe, based on today's performance, nobody should be dropped?

Still have doged it

So let's see even more specific:

Barrass conceded 3 needless goals in a pr

I'm not implying it, I'm saying it.

You don't drop a player who has a bad game or two.
You back him in that he won't let you down when it counts.

It's obvious you want a scapegoat.

So, if that's a qualifying final, and Barrass conceded 3 goals and we miss the grand final, that's totally ok yeah?

Admit it, he played like shit and coat us the game. If you are that staunch i can happily set up a poll. I'll win

 

[GWeagles]

They'll pick the best available side.

Interesting to see if Hawks play Roughy?

On SM-G925I using BigFooty.com mobile app

He has 4 goals before 3QT. Hope he comes. Want us to win but give him the send off he deserves. Great player.

 

[Tugga27]

Still have doged it

So let's see even more specific:

Barrass conceded 3 needless goals in a pr


So, if that's a qualifying final, and Barrass conceded 3 goals and we miss the grand final, that's totally ok yeah?

Admit it, he played like s**t and coat us the game. If you are that staunch i can happily set up a poll. I'll win

If my Auntie had balls, she'd be my uncle.
It wasn't a final.

He had a shocker. I don't think anyone's thinks he didn't.

But making knee jerk emotional decisions won't solve anything.
If he's in our best 22 (and he is), you back him in.

You can run your silly poll.
I bet you will get slaughtered.

 

[West Coast 06]

I will say that I honestly would rather Schofield in the side than Barrass. He was poo today and he has not been great in any game since coming back from injury.

At least Schoey is reliable and will kill the contest most times.

Out Barrass, Hutchings

In Cameron, Schofield

 

[wce4premiership]

Duggan in for Rotham (omit)
I know people want Masten for Hutchings (inj) but I would prefer Cameron.

People say we can't play Pet and Cameron at the same time but I think we can.

If you look at it stat wise:

Jack Petruccelle and Chris Masten AFL Stats Comparison

Jack Petruccelle and Chris Masten AFL Stats Comparison.

www.footywire.com

Petruccelle averages more goals, goal assists, i50s, tackles and metres gained from less possession and less time on ground. Rioli and Cripps can cover the running (which they have done the last too weeks).

Just don't see the point of dropping our future for marginal (if any) immediate improvement.

He plays less TOG because he literally can't play any more.

They also play different positions. Masten isn't a small forward, he'll play a wing like Hutch. It could be Duggan in, with Nelson/Jetta on a wing. I doubt Cameron comes in for Hutch.

Not sure what weight the coaches will hold to it but Petruccelle lead the team for Pressure acts.

 

[Tugga27]

I will say that I honestly would rather Schofield in the side than Barrass. He was poo today and he has not been great in any game since coming back from injury.

At least Schoey is reliable and will kill the contest most times.

Out Barrass, Hutchings

In Cameron, Schofield

Schoey will spoil but that's all you will get out of him.
Barrass at his best take plenty of intercept marks.

Think he's in the top 5 in the league for them.

 

[wce4premiership]

I will say that I honestly would rather Schofield in the side than Barrass. He was poo today and he has not been great in any game since coming back from injury.

At least Schoey is reliable and will kill the contest most times.

Out Barrass, Hutchings

In Cameron, Schofield

Barrass was actually exceptional outside of those moments. He won't be that bad again. Hurn also played shit. Our players need to learn how to kill a ball, going for the mark allows forwards to contest it as well.

 

[GWeagles]

I will say that I honestly would rather Schofield in the side than Barrass. He was poo today and he has not been great in any game since coming back from injury.

At least Schoey is reliable and will kill the contest most times.

Out Barrass, Hutchings

In Cameron, Schofield

Schofield doesn't bring the marking power. He plays the third tall that frees up Gov and Barrass. Schofield has leaked his fair share of goals too. To suggest Barrass is not reliable is based on a sample size of today.