Prediction Changes round five

[sr36]

View attachment 655707

Get us Ben Crocker into the room and we will all follow.

I haven't been this excited since Josh Smith looked like getting a game.

 

[Deleted member 133504]

View attachment 655707

Good ol' Jean Luc. I hear he is a Carlton fan. Poor bugger.

 

[FireKrakouer]

 

[sr36]

View attachment 655721

Whilst we are pretty significant, I'm not sure if you, me and Unplugged can be descrijbed as Bigfooty.

 

[sideswipe]

Franklin another. Wasn’t for several years did he play Hawks.

If you remove the 8 home and away games he played against the Hawks between 2014 and 2017, and the 2014 Grand Final, then yeah, you are not far off being right. He did miss two games against them in 2018.

Do you often argue with the voices in your head?

 

[Kilmo]

After listening to Buck's presser it doesn't sound like it is Crock'O'Clock just yet.

Sounds like Beams is in for sure, and the only other one I could see getting a game would be Greenwood.

 

[adammania9]

Reckon we will let Neale run riot, similar to how we've left Tom Mitchell alone in the past. Remember the time Bucks said he wasn't damaging when he had 75 touches? Would've had merit if we hadn't actually lost the game.

Nope we won that game. Round 9, 2017 when Mitchell had 50 but we won in that massive 40 point comeback.

 

[unplugged]

After listening to Buck's presser it doesn't sound like it is Crock'O'Clock just yet.

Sounds like Beams is in for sure, and the only other one I could see getting a game would be Greenwood.

Bucks playing mind games. It's Crock O'clock.

 

[Saintly Viewed]

I like the dismissal of still calling them the Bears lol.

It never gets old.

They’re the bears.

We have THE bear.

 

[sr36]

After listening to Buck's presser it doesn't sound like it is Crock'O'Clock just yet.

Sounds like Beams is in for sure, and the only other one I could see getting a game would be Greenwood.

Where can we hear these lies.

 

[sr36]

Bucks playing mind games. It's Crock O'clock.

Yep. When you're unveiling a secret weapon, you don't announce it.

 

[CFC2010]

 

[CFC2010]

 

[Timmy from Thomastown]

In beams out mayne.

I’d be tempted to stick with brown and not use Greenwood, rather rely on our mids to beat Brisbane’s as a collective without worrying too much about neale specifically

 

[Scodog10]

But Lions supporters assured us he wouldn’t front up?!

 

[CFC2010]

But Lions supporters assured us he wouldn’t front up?!

We failed in our due diligence apparently!

 

[whiskeytown]

Great that Beams is back. But we still should get Greenwood in to tag Neale.

For his 155 possessions this year (38.8 per game) Neale is going at a remarkable rate of 50% of his possessions being contested and is also dominating clearances averaging 9 a game (next best Zorko 4.5 per game) and 3.8 centre clearances a game (next best Martin with 1.8 per game).

We can beat them with Neale playing unhindered... but cut Neale's influence in half and we are all but guaranteed of winning because they don't have another player who will step up and influence a game to the same level.

 

[The Magnificent Seven]

For his 155 possessions this year (38.8 per game) Neale is going at a remarkable rate of 50% of his possessions being contested and is also dominating clearances averaging 9 a game (next best Zorko 4.5 per game) and 3.8 centre clearances a game (next best Martin with 1.8 per game)

Why wouldn't we just play Beams as a run-with? He can find enough of his own ball and is damaging if he wins enough of it. Levi is great at squashing a player but not necessarily providing us with an advantage scoring-wise

 

[Jen2310]

When Neale has been getting 40 disposables per game the last few weeks, wouldn't you consider tagging him?

 

[Piestration]

How many 100 metre goals has the Bear kicked?

This kid Cody was good mates with my son in High School.

 

[Yidaki]

I'm backing beamsy in for BOG. 35 & 3.

 

[whiskeytown]

Why wouldn't we just play Beams as a run-with? He can find enough of his own ball and is damaging if he wins enough of it. Levi is great at squashing a player but not necessarily providing us with an advantage scoring-wise

I wouldn't want to compromise Beams game. His creativity and score involvement is an asset like you said. I also think because of his game, Beams won't be able to play defensive enough to properly nullify Neale.

With Greenwood on Neale. He has the discipline and stamina to run with Neale all night. And like in chess.. the idea is to sacrifice your pawn for the greater piece, not one of your bishop's. Greenwood gets 10 touches and Neale 20, and we win that equation.

In: Beams, Greenwood

Out: Mayne, Brown

 

[Saintly Viewed]

View attachment 655721

In such matters, the best posture to adopt, is to go with whoever says yes first.

 

[Horaceg]

In beams out mayne.

I’d be tempted to stick with brown and not use Greenwood, rather rely on our mids to beat Brisbane’s as a collective without worrying too much about neale specifically

Stop Neale, we win, we might anyway but why chance it. I think Greenwood should play.

 

[Apex36]

Franklin another. Wasn’t for several years did he play Hawks.

Year 1, round 8, 2014. Are you trying to be wrong on purpose?