- Aug 1, 2008
- 15,149
- 25,678
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Banned
- #101
The distinction between Jong and Suckling is obvious to you of all people.So Jong was obviously part of it also with his clanger count ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
The distinction between Jong and Suckling is obvious to you of all people.So Jong was obviously part of it also with his clanger count ?
PerhapsI really don't like your allegation that Suckling is match fixing.
I am surprised the mods allow such a clearly defamatory and baseless allegation to be aired repeatedly.
It's also quite illogical. Read your post again - if the game was close - so you're a match fixer - do you pay one guy to fix the match on the guess that its close?
You've written some bizarre shit but I think this actually beats everything for bizarre tin foil hat conspiracy BS that I've seen by anyone on BF.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
What I'd do;
IN: Stringer, Dahlhaus, Cordy, Minson.
Out: Wallis, Redpath, Morris, Jong.
What will probably happen ;
IN: Stringer, Dahlhaus, Hamling
OUT: Redpath, Wallis, Morris
Rate Suckling better up the ground where his mess ups can be better mitigated. and Will is a bit of a necessary evil until Campbell is back.Sounds good. I like the idea of Minno in and Toyd staying at FF tho apparently he didn't do too well today. Bit down on Suckling too - wonder what the go is there? Thought he was BOG a few weeks ago but since thrown in a couple of worst ons.
I will qualify what I said so you don't take what I said out of context.A reasoned observation is "hey fellow top 8 side who has covered for injuries all year. In light of some more injuries you'd be happy with a 50 point loss right?"
You're ridiculous.
Piss off keyboard warrior. go back where you belong.I will qualify what I said so you don't take what I said out of context.
In isolation, no. I do not think that any supporter would or should be happy with any loss. However, a resignation of the futility of a task can somewhat temper one's expectations of an ultimately desired result.
So, when one observes the doom and gloom combined with the facts that; a) your last loss to us was by 57 points, b) your injuries are worse than the last time we played and c) the game is being played at a ground which is essentially the antithesis of what Etihad Stadium is.
I get that you didn't like my comment, but I hardly think it was remiss of me to suggest what I did, keeping in mind the facts presented and the context in which it was said.
Of course it was remiss and you know it.I will qualify what I said so you don't take what I said out of context.
In isolation, no. I do not think that any supporter would or should be happy with any loss. However, a resignation of the futility of a task can somewhat temper one's expectations of an ultimately desired result.
So, when one observes the doom and gloom combined with the facts that; a) your last loss to us was by 57 points, b) your injuries are worse than the last time we played and c) the game is being played at a ground which is essentially the antithesis of what Etihad Stadium is.
I get that you didn't like my comment, but I hardly think it was remiss of me to suggest what I did, keeping in mind the facts presented and the context in which it was said.
Me tooWant some Hrovat action![]()
Bev needs to mix it upSeats on the titanic this week in my opinion
If we get within ten goals I will be amazed.
They absolutely dismantled us last time and then switched off at half time, smelling blood now and down there I have grave dangers this may be a slapping
Given those 'ins' - is it your view that your best 22 is will be stronger than the team put on the park earlier this year?Of course it was remiss and you know it.
What possible response did you expect?
Did you expect us to say we would be happy with a 50 point loss? To a team that have looked decidedly shaky since our last meeting. To a team that is equal with us on premiership points.
Our last meeting was one epoch in time where our team was decidedly average on the day. This will not happen again. Our injuries are rough equal, not worse. We have Dahlhaus and Stringer coming back and Dale Morris may yet come up for the game. We have also played our best football away from Etihad this year, something you may have noticed had you had more than a superficial understanding of our team.
Now given that context do you think we'd be happy with a 50 point loss?
No of course we wouldn't be happy. You want to know what we'd consider a win? A ******* win!
Now off with you and your not so subtle baiting.
and Minson
.
Given those 'ins' - is it your view that your best 22 is will be stronger than the team put on the park earlier this year?
With regards to Etihad and Kardinia Park; just ask Adelaide supporters what they think of the place. "Trumped up suburban shithole" and the rest... it's not a pleasant place to play footy and your form at grounds other than Etihad has no bearing on how you'll play there.
As for our last meeting being "one epoch" - I beg to differ. History suggests we have the wood on you; hell - there was even a thread created after our last match bemoaning this very fact!
Of course, every match is different and our form has been shaky since we last faced off. You seem personally bullish about your club's chances to come home with a win. That's not a bad thing at all.