Changes v Geelong

[jules101]

I think I have made this thread the last 4 weeks lol.
Well after Fridays performance the outs should look like this: Out: The whole team.
However thats not possible, so I think they will look something like this:

Out: Peverill, Monfries (just for a rest)
In: J Johnson, Lonergan (Played well in the magoos, time to give him a chance in the seniors)

 

[Darealrath]

They look good to me, though I'd also put Bolton out for Campo assuming he's fit.

 

[jules101]

They look good to me, though I'd also put Bolton out for Campo assuming he's fit.

forgot about him. Yes if fit and Sheeds ONLY if fit Campo in

 

[eorl]

said it once and will say it again Bradley OUT Lee IN need a player capable of playing on the tall fast leading forward

agree with jules on the rest

 

[jules101]

said it once and will say it again Bradley OUT Lee IN need a player capable of playing on the tall fast leading forward

agree with jules on the rest

Haha i forgot about him too, he will be out with his injury I would imagine.

 

[S.C[BANKS]]

Out-Pev,Augus Monfries,Mark bolton
IN-Ben Jolley, Andrew Lee, T. Catlendge(he needs a go especially with the recent losses)

 

[Longy413]

IN - Lee, JJ, Campo, Jolley
OUT - Bradley, Bolton, Peverill, Monfries

Bradley is injured anyway, isn't he?
Ben Jolley's form and conistency demands selection. Simply can't ignore a bloke that does his job every single week.

 

[mcphee_is_a_gun]

Lee is an obvious replacement for Bradley, got in the best for Bendigo today too.

 

[Darealrath]

Yeah, Bradley out...Lee in. Good sign that i'm already forgetting about things that happened on Friday night at least.

Can't argue with you about Jolley, Longy.

Got a feeling Sheeds will want Reynolds back. Hopefully Sheeds notices his goal tally and plays him in the forward half if he does play. Dyson might be one to make way though i hope he stays.

 

[go_the_bombers]

In: Lee JJ Jolley Campo Reynolds
Out: Bolton Bradley Peverill Monfries Dyson


I would like to see Dyson stay in the team but I have a feeling he will be heading to Bendigo!

I'm not a big fan of Reynolds but if he kicks 5 goals in the VFL why not play in as a forward in the seniors! He's been played everywhere else!

 

[Philzsay]

In: Lee, JJ, Jolley
Out: Bradley, Pev, Ryder

I would ease Campo through a half with Bendigo before recalling him.

 

[Longy413]

In: Lee, JJ, Jolley
Out: Bradley, Pev, Ryder

Ryder didn't play mate.

 

[Hirdy!!]

In: Johnson, Longergan, Camporeale

Out: Bradley, Bolton, Pev

 

[jules101]

In: Johnson, Longergan, Camporeale

Out: Bradley, Bolton, Pev

Agree with that but I am fairly sure Monfries will be rested this week

 

[Philzsay]

Ryder didn't play mate.

Yeah just realised that! I suppose I forget he didn't play because it seemed like there were a few Bomber players short on the ground anyway...

I will drop Gus instead to give him a rest, so:

In: Lee, JJ, Jolley
Out: Bradley, Pev, Gus

 

[marcuz]

Its time to have a look at Lee and one of either Jolley or Lonergan.

Pev has lost his role to heff and can spend the next 3 months busting his gut for bendigo. And boltons squib effort will not go unpunished as sheeds hates that .

In: Lee, Lonergan, Campo

Out: Bolton, Bradley, Peverill

 

[mcphee_is_a_gun]

In Lee, Lonergan, Hocking, Jolley, Johnson

Out Peveril, Bradley, Bolton, Monfries, Slattery

just to rotate the young guys through however 5 changes may be too many.

 

[Karlostj]

Out: Monfries (rest), Bradley (inj), Dyson (rest), Pev (omitted).
Ins: Jolly, Lee, JJ, Campo

I can't see Bolton being dropped, other then on friday he has been far from the worst... Dyson needs a break, since Carlton he's been down a bit, hopefully he'll get back to form at Bendigo. Monfries to have a rest, pev not as critical if we get JJ and Campo back.

Unlucky is Reynolds, who could miss out on selection. I hope he keeps playing well at Bendigo and gets another go soon.

 

[Longy413]

I can't see Bolton being dropped, other then on friday he has been far from the worst...

Fundamental of football is, you keep your eye on the footy and commit yourself to win the ball when it is in your area.

Bolton failed to do that because he feared physical contact. He's a 100 game player, there is no excuses for that. We can't have young players thinking you can get away with not putting your body on the line.

Monfries, Slattery, Longergan, Jolley, Hocking, Winderlich....these kids never would have done that. They would have committed.

I'm sorry, but if you bring very little to the side in terms of skill, then you need to be hard at the footy. If you're not going to put your body on the line for your teammates, your club, your supporters, then you need to go back to Bendigo for a spell. Not acceptable.

 

[marcuz]

Fundamental of football is, you keep your eye on the footy and commit yourself to win the ball when it is in your area.

Bolton failed to do that because he feared physical contact. He's a 100 game player, there is no excuses for that. We can't have young players thinking you can get away with not putting your body on the line.

Monfries, Slattery, Longergan, Jolley, Hocking, Winderlich....these kids never would have done that. They would have committed.

I'm sorry, but if you bring very little to the side in terms of skill, then you need to be hard at the footy. If you're not going to put your body on the line for your teammates, your club, your supporters, then you need to go back to Bendigo for a spell. Not acceptable.

Well said Longy.

When its your turn to put your head over the nut you do it, there is no greater insult to a footballer than to be known as a squib.

 

[Philzsay]

I agree Bolton should be dropped for what he did against Adelaide, however I don't think Sheeds will dop him.

 

[dave_27]

I know Reynolds missed that sitter against Port but other than that I thought he was ok and was abit unlucky to be dropped for the Adelaide game.

I hope he is given a decent run, others wont agree with me but I think their is some serious potential their to work with.

 

[Rhombus]

Surprised no one has mentioned C Johns as a possible omission.

Or does that 1st minute mark give him a gold card for the next few games?

 

[Longy413]

Surprised no one has mentioned C Johns as a possible omission.

Or does that 1st minute mark give him a gold card for the next few games?

How many blokes have kicked 2 goals on Rutten in the last two years?

Especially given the amount of ball that went into our forward line, 2 goals wasn't a bad return and worthy of another game.

 

[jules101]

Surprised no one has mentioned C Johns as a possible omission.

Or does that 1st minute mark give him a gold card for the next few games?

Replaced by who?
and the ball never got down to him. Not his fault.