Prediction Changes v GWS

[Hong-Kong Phooey]

Sam Gray gets a lot of flak on here but it's interesting to compare him to Puopolo who btw gets selected every week by the world's greatest coach. Basically similar types. Stat wise Sam performs better in most areas.

Sam is a whipping boy. But is actually a pretty good player. If we had an extra tall forward like we should he wouldn't be our tall forward

 

[Rigs]

 

[pastmyprimus]

Ken's idea of being adventurous is to give Sutcliffe a tagging role against a Richmond defender

 

[Magus]

View attachment 713720

So adventurous to do something you already did this year.

 

[PowerBaz]

View attachment 713720

No playing Frampton most of the year and not dropping him at your first chance is adventurous, playing Paddy in a forward role is what we’ve already seen....

Ken, keeps going back to the same dry well....

 

[PowerBaz]

View attachment 713720

He just lies and makes stuff up...

 

[SureBuddy]

We haven’t seen Lycett and Ryder together, while Dixon is in the team. Makes a massive difference.

 

[JUSTWORK]

We haven’t seen Lycett and Ryder together, while Dixon is in the team. Makes a massive difference.

I do agree, I would like to see how Ryder works as a forward with Dixon in the side. Let’s not go around calling it “adventurous” it’s not, it’s going back to something that failed earlier in the year hoping that it won’t now.

Ryder doesn’t like playing as the second ruckman who plays mainly forward and I suspect that’s the main reason he doesn’t succeed in that role.

It’s typical Hinkley. Something hasn’t worked previously but maybe it will this time.

 

[Schulzenfest]

View attachment 713720

Going back to the thing that didn't work for the first three months of the season isn't 'changing things up and being adventurous' you spud.

 

[Capital Power]

View attachment 713720

Don't GWS play two rucks and a tall forward line? They must be real trailblazers...

 

[LP7_]

Oh Kenneth you adventurous bastard! I loved the adventure we went on when we tagged Nick Vlaustin. That was a crazy ride!

 

[TeeKray]

Lol. He's just taking the piss now because he knows it's going to be all over soon.

 

[Andre]

We haven’t seen Lycett and Ryder together, while Dixon is in the team. Makes a massive difference.

Sure it'll help, but real adventurous would be playing all of Dixon, Howard and Ryder/Lcyett forward. We know if Ryder comes in Howard will go back and it'll still be Dixon, Dixon, Dixon, as only focus when he's forward (our 'spare' players as he's double, triple or quadrupled teamed off having a tea party by the boundary line or 80 metres up the field) or both Dixon and Ryder will be up the ground kicking to Sam Gray as our KPF.

 

[tribey]

I hope the happy clappers are ready.

“Why don’t you apply for the job then”

If I’ll get $700,000 to deliver one more win than St. Binfire I probably will hey.

 

[Magus]

“Why don’t you apply for the job then”

If I’ll get $700,000 to deliver one more win than St. Binfire I probably will hey.

I wish someone would pay me 700 grand a year to play Frampton and Garner.

 

[Doctor Feel]

Dale Lewis was pretty good on the Ken/Pyke stuff. He said with regards to Pyke, if you are going to play an older side like he keeps doing - you absolutely have to win. You can't have experienced sides and continue to lose as that gives the supporters nothing to look forward to and it also doesn't develop your talent.

He said the same for Ken, if you're going to play Sutcliffe ahead of youngsters then you have to win, which is a fair assessment.

Same thing with co-captains. Claim it's going to help you win games, then you had better ******* win games.

 

[Enviable Tradition]

Dale Lewis was pretty good on the Ken/Pyke stuff. He said with regards to Pyke, if you are going to play an older side like he keeps doing - you absolutely have to win. You can't have experienced sides and continue to lose as that gives the supporters nothing to look forward to and it also doesn't develop your talent.

He said the same for Ken, if you're going to play Sutcliffe ahead of youngsters then you have to win, which is a fair assessment.

Same thing with co-captains. Claim it's going to help you win games, then you had better ******* win games.

Yep.

Playing Sutcliffe and not playing Frampton and Garner immediately invalidates the excuse of missing finals because we are focused on development.

On SM-G960F using
BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[porttoport]

Against board rules be careful


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Kiss from a Rozee]

I only saw the first quarter against Richmond but Sutcliffe looked okay in that. Did he do nothing after qtr time or something?

Like I understand the issues with him, but he seemed much better than Kane Farrell’s last effort.

I would prefer Woodcock obviously, but he looked much better than against Fremantle IMO.

 

[bomberclifford]

Against board rules be careful

lol, like I meant it literally.

 

[NEGAN]

View attachment 713720

Is this guy for real...

I am without words

 

[Duckimus Prime]

So adventurous to do something you already did this year.

When have we played them both in form this year?

 

[tribey]

Against board rules be careful

Look Kasabian’s not everyone’s cup of tea but we’d all agree Fire is one of the bangers of the early 21st sench.

 

[Magus]

When have we played them both in form this year?

Ryder still isn't in form, despite what Chadbro is selling.

 

[Shaucob_Burjan]

Of course we're going to return Ryder to the AFL side a week before Frampton returns from suspension