And if Ryder and Houston are not good ?Frampton in for Dixon and SPP for Sam Gray.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
And if Ryder and Houston are not good ?Frampton in for Dixon and SPP for Sam Gray.
Before everything went south and we lost 3 players we were playing very good football. The mix looked right. I'm not in a hurry to bring SPP back in until sanfl form demands it. Just 2 of Ollie Rocky and SPP.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I think they will both play.And if Ryder and Houston are not good ?
Ryder has to play. It’s all or nothing now.
Changes for me are Dixon for Hombsch. Howard goes forward. No other changes.
Nah losing key players during the game is getting a little old. I would save him for Essendon.
Grundy actually goes ok and taking an unsound player in against him is going to end badly.
Thinking about it maybe the smart move is Doogs in the ruck and running with him.
Nah losing key players during the game is getting a little old. I would save him for Essendon.
Grundy actually goes ok and taking an unsound player in against him is going to end badly.
Thinking about it maybe the smart move is Doogs in the ruck and running with him.
Frampton plays, even if Ryder is fit. We can heavily manage Ryder if Frampton plays well.
Its a massive gamble, We need a fit Ryder come September but without him we may not win next week thus not make Finals, hopefully Ryder plays gets through the game fine and Billy is good enough to carry the bulk of the work and back it up v Essendon.
We can look at rotating Howard forward against Essendon and come finals. But think we may need his height against Cox.
Frampton plays because you want him to or because you think Ken will pick him?
I want him and we need to, i don't think Ken has a choice. No one else can come in to offer what Dixon does, the dominant presence up forward.
Howard maybe able to go forward, but we may need him to jump against Cox and Hombsch was awful last week, so i'm in no rush to bring him back if we do roll Howard forward.
Plus Frampton allows us to take load of Ryder and manage him a bit better (assuming Ryder plays and Frampton is competitive.)
I think we can beat Collingwood.
Westhoff ff and to rotate with Frampton.
Wingard forward to kick some gems along with Johnson.
Robbie in the guts with Frampton and Wines, Gray knows how to extract the footy from a losing ruck.
Watts to what used to be called CHF to get the ball forward.
Polec and Motlop on the wings.
Defense is okay.
Ebert dropped and Bonner in.
I am being optimistic here for a change.
What do ya reckon Ken.
I’d say it’s ridiculous at this point to say it’s a given Frampton will play. Most likely scenario is probably Lindsay in for Dixon, Dougal into the ruck with Westhoff the chop out, and probably Hombsch/Trengove back into defence
Don't know why but I really do think we can win, we have to bring in a ruck though to keep Westhoff forward.If Bonner is in for Ebo. Motlop forward for the scoring power and speed (can rotate through the middle) Bonner and Polly on the wings.
SPP for S.Gray.
A horrible scenario but one I am prepared for. Let's attack Collingwood's undersized defence with an undersized forward line.
Be funny if Billy played and someone told him it's like playing Centrals. We may need a police escort to the airport
And c'mon guys, Ken is not going to drop Ebert for Bonner.
Not sure about Todd.How far away is a holla for a Marshall?
Could be fit for the first final if we make it. Big ask bringing him back for that game though.How far away is a holla for a Marshall?