Preview Changes v Sydney, Rd 8

[schmuttt]

If you're gonna play the antagonist don't sook when people bite back would be one.

I’m absolutely not clicking on show ignored content but if old mate is having a sook maybe don’t go people every day when they disagree with you. I’ve also only ever reported one posters stuff on this board and it was that guy that hates Charlie Spargo.

 

[AmericanAFL]

I’m absolutely not clicking on show ignored content but if old mate is having a sook maybe don’t go people every day when they disagree with you. I’ve also only ever reported one posters stuff on this board and it was that guy that hates Charlie Spargo.

Have heard of this guy multiple times now. Dislike for Spargo seems a very odd thing to be known for. Might be an A11dAtP0w3R alt.

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

Have heard of this guy multiple times now. Dislike for Spargo seems a very odd thing to be known for. Might be an A11dAtP0w3R alt.

? Spargo? When have I hated on him?

 

[AmericanAFL]

? Spargo? When have I hated on him?

Never as far as I know. But everyone seems very wound up about the anti-Spargo account. So if it was someone’s troll account, it’s been very successful.

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

Never as far as I know. But everyone seems very wound up about the anti-Spargo account. So if it was someone’s troll account, it’s been very successful.

I'd never heard of it til you and schmutt mentioned it right now.

 

[pjfairbairn]

Geez it's a waste of my time reading through petty arguments when I'm here for actual chat about changes v Sydney. Can you campaigners just leave it out so those of us who couldn't give two flying *s about who posts what (and don't actually remember who is who) want to come here and contribute/enjoy your content too? Thanks in advance x

 

[dee_mac]

Geez it's a waste of my time reading through petty arguments when I'm here for actual chat about changes v Sydney. Can you campaigners just leave it out so those of us who couldn't give two flying fu**s about who posts what (and don't actually remember who is who) want to come here and contribute/enjoy your content too? Thanks in advance x

Reported

 

[Proper Gander]

Since when are the board mods nice?

 

[Proper Gander]

I'd never heard of it til you and schmutt mentioned it right now.

the poster doesn’t post much anymore. Here, anyway. But he occasionally has a strange run of fixated posts potting Spargo. Always seemed a strange choice, really

 

[GatesOfHell]

Reported

Thanks for the rent free space in your head.

 

[KickLongTackleHard]

Petty in for Tommo fits the next man up, position based approach Richmond have talked about and we seem to have bought into. If everyone was trained in two positions, you’d assume TMac was Fwd and Wing, Petty back and fwd, so this seems the logical move as first option.

On the same basis I’d like to see Sparrow in for Viney and leave Brayshaw on the wing. In game, if Sparrow struggles Brayshaw can be be swung in. It could be Harmes instead, coaches love him, but I’d like to see Sparrow get some more midfield minutes.

 

[schmuttt]

I like Harmes but shouldn’t be near the side atm. Only played one game in the VFL wouldn’t have thought he’s in the frame for selection yet.

 

[Crimson Azure]

Official board rules state that if you act like a flog you get treated like a flog so...

Magna Cartaesque those rules.

 

[schmuttt]

Sydney play like this again we won’t lose.

 

[Crimson Azure]

Sydney play like this again we won’t lose.View attachment 1119657View attachment 1119658

Looking at those stats its unfathomable Geelong lost.

 

[Topkent]

Looking at those stats its unfathomable Geelong lost.

There was like 3 key stats not sure which ones but in 66 previous times those metrics had been hit that team had won 66 times. Geelong win that game 99 out of 100

 

[Jamurp]

Sydney play like this again we won’t lose.View attachment 1119657View attachment 1119658

I think Sydney are ranked 16th or something for tackles inside 50, whereas it's one of our big strengths, if we pressure them like we did against Richmond then I think we really should be winning this.

 

[Crimson Azure]

There was like 3 key stats not sure which ones but in 66 previous times those metrics had been hit that team had won 66 times. Geelong win that game 99 out of 100

Makes their loss so so much sweeter.

 

[Bluelegs]

Looking at those stats its unfathomable Geelong lost.

Reminds me of our game v Essendon in 2014. Essendon dominated every single stat and we won by a point.

 

[Gysberts2Bate]

Reminds me of our game v Essendon in 2014. Essendon dominated every single stat and we won by a point.

Both games a lot to do with inaccurate goalkicking

 

[mrmonkey]

Reminds me of our game v Essendon in 2014. Essendon dominated every single stat and we won by a point.

Was a weird game we should have been done by half time. All those missed chances must have sucked the energy out of them because we dominated from about midway through the 3rd to memory only for zaharakis to almost steal it back.

 

[Bluelegs]

Both games a lot to do with inaccurate goalkicking

Essendon should have been up by ten goals at half time that day. They missed so many sitters.

 

[LeverPuller]

There was like 3 key stats not sure which ones but in 66 previous times those metrics had been hit that team had won 66 times. Geelong win that game 99 out of 100

Yep but there’s only one key stat that dictates win or loss

 

[Scythe94]

Yep but there’s only one key stat that dictates win or loss

One percenters

 

[knackers29]

Was a weird game we should have been done by half time. All those missed chances must have sucked the energy out of them because we dominated from about midway through the 3rd to memory only for zaharakis to almost steal it back.

Was at the Gold Coast Casino that night getting pissed watching with a bunch of Essendon supporters!! Good times!!