Cutler in for a bit more run me thinksMatho gone for a week!
Could be an opening for C Lyons?
Or do we bring Cutler back in for a bit more run in the West?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Cutler in for a bit more run me thinksMatho gone for a week!
Could be an opening for C Lyons?
Or do we bring Cutler back in for a bit more run in the West?
How Rayner got a game based off his last few weeks is astounding. Good to see he’s held to the same standard as Cutler.
Out - Mathieson, Rayner (won’t happen given he’s Fagan’s pet)
Ins - Keays, Cutler (won’t happen for either b/c of Fagan’s bias)
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The reasons to drop Rayner seems longer than the reasons to keep him in but Fagan has always given the young blokes a bit more time than he does the mature guys. And I’m more than OK with that. I mean, people were calling for Witho’s head and he’s just come out with a really solid game.
I’d drop Rayner but I’m not going to whine if he stays in. Some are getting a bit personal with their comments on this issue.
As I think we too tall in the forward line and not big on the 2 rucks. It worked only 50% of the time. The games we lost we where down a extra runner.Strange logic. Rayner isn't like for like with Rayner but you'd bring him in for McInerney?
Cutler should be in and should be here next year and is by and far our best wingmen.I don't think Cutler is the answer they're looking for because the first opportunity they had to drop him they did. For whatever reason I'm resigned to him being elsewhere next year unless he miraculously starts playing differently ,it's been a few years now. The good thing is we do have some guys in form to come in if necessary . I haven't got any real preference between 3 or 4 of them .
Zorko was just messing about trying to waste time. Didn't fool the umpires who told him to get on with it.
Would like him to prove himself in the NEAFL first. I would like C.Lyons to get a go.Noticeably with the possible outings against Freeo there has been no mention of Squizzy Taylor as a replacement....I would like him to have a go to prove himself after his last disappointing game.
He seems to be out of favour for our game style which seems to be a lot about territory.Noticeably with the possible outings against Freeo there has been no mention of Squizzy Taylor as a replacement....I would like him to have a go to prove himself after his last disappointing game.
MRP have completly opened themselves up to criticism when they dont suspend the big players but then suspend that. I can understamd why they suspended it but i also think it was insufficient force
Cutler should be in and should be here next year and is by and far our best wingmen.
I think he should be left to play. People call him selfish, but if you ask me, he is one of the few with unique damaging attributes that should be let off the chain. IMO, he is one of our top 10 players and to be frank, it is insane that he isn't utilised or in the most effective manner.
Personally I think McCluggage is our best wingman, but i could just be crazy i guess
Well that's what I've been saying all along but I was so dumbfounded that he was dropped last week that I'll just leave it to the clubCutler should be in and should be here next year and is by and far our best wingmen.
I think he should be left to play. People call him selfish, but if you ask me, he is one of the few with unique damaging attributes that should be let off the chain. IMO, he is one of our top 10 players and to be frank, it is insane that he isn't utilised or in the most effective manner.

