Preview Changes Vs Adelaide round 23

[Woobla Stainz]

Sloane and Danger out of your mids

That's like taking Shuey and um... another guy.. out of our mids

Other guy = NN? Our second best inside mid?

 

[2006_Eagles]

Other guy = NN? Our second best inside mid?

Well it works, so what the hey

 

[garlic munchers]

Sloane and Danger out of your mids

That's like taking Shuey and um... another guy.. out of our mids

Call it as our entire midfield and chuck in Hill and it would be square.

 

[SloppyJoe]

We've been given a massive free kick here by the MRP. Sloane is the first player I'd take out of that Adelaide side, by some margin.

 

[Chris_6678]

Sloane had a monster 4th 1/4 last time we played!

 

[Goldfish]

Sloane had a monster 4th 1/4 last time we played!

The whole side did unfortunately.

 

[SpaceClef]

Sloane and Danger out of your mids

That's like taking Shuey and um... another guy.. out of our mids

Edwards

 

[2006_Eagles]

Edwards

wat

 

[truman]

Sloane and Danger out of your mids

That's like taking Shuey and um... another guy.. out of our mids

Stenglein?

 

[javaguice]

Out nata in mcginnity

 

[WUUBLY DUUBLY]

yer that other guy is brilliant

..what a guy....what a guy

 

[Biggie]

Sloane had a monster 4th 1/4 last time we played!

Certainly did.

A big loss for the Crows, that cannot be denied.

But they have good structures and good men to cover his absence.

Hopefully they bring in Van Berlo, he'd be good for WCE

 

[baldandbroke]

Sloane and Danger out of your mids

That's like taking Shuey and um... another guy.. out of our mids

Bit rich calling Danger an out We have managed without him for the last 20 games

Brad crouch is an in since we played you last ... plus guys like Lyon and Atkins have improved out of sight.

Do you think Sloane out is as big as Nic Nat out?

Should be a great game nonetheless.

 

[Goldfish]

Bit rich calling Danger an out We have managed without him for the last 20 games

Brad crouch is an in since we played you last ... plus guys like Lyon and Atkins have improved out of sight.

Do you think Sloane out is as big as Nic Nat out?

Should be a great game nonetheless.

Probably not... Will be interesting to see how we tackle it.

 

[Dark Sharks]

We're looking to november, we can start a rebuild we can fix......

 

[Agent93]

Do you think Sloane out is as big as Nic Nat out?

Nah, he's 18 centimetres shorter.

(had to)

 

[2006_Eagles]

Nah, he's 18 centimetres shorter.

(had to)

 

[2006_Eagles]

..what a guy....what a guy

 

[Big_Tony]

Out: Nic Nat
In: Barrass

Maybe time to try Darling providing chop-out in the ruck around the ground. Lycett will be needed at the vast majority of centre bounces. While Darling is out of the forward line Lycett can be resting there... or Yeo can be forward in place of Darling. Although Yeo would also be handy as 3rd man up too. I think Darling would offer a lot more around the ground than Brown or Giles if he has the tank. Interesting to see what we go with.

 

[The Gtrain]

The good news is that Adelaide have not won without Sloane this year which is probably the deciding factor!

Whilst we have won without Nic Nat...

 

[SloppyJoe]

The good news is that Adelaide have not won without Sloane this year which is probably the deciding factor!

Nice 1 - he's played every game.

 

[WCE1698]

In: Lamb
Out: Nic

Put Yeo in the ruck.

 

[WCE1698]

Get Barrass in there somehow as well

 

[The Gtrain]

Nice 1 - he's played every game.

Details....

Sent from my XT1572 using Tapatalk

 

[1990crow]

They are ripe for the picking guys.