raman
Kind of a Jagger-Tarzan
I don't disagree but we shouldn't let him go on all year like this.
Not saying we should either. That said, I don't see Marshall looking bad enough that Frampton seems like a better option.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I don't disagree but we shouldn't let him go on all year like this.
Frampton has never shown anything as a forward at SANFL level. I.e. repeat leads, body positioning in a 1v1, recovery when the ball hits the deck, kicking i50.
And yet he is an apparent superstar. John Butcher all over again.
Taking the odd pack mark does not make you a good forward.
Except that Marshall's playing Marshall's role. There's literally not a single thing Frampton has over Marshall right now except evidently a couple of BigFooty posters who'd rather roll the dice on a colossal gamble than be a little bit patient with a sure thing.
Not saying we should either. That said, I don't see Marshall looking bad enough that Frampton seems like a better option.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Colossal gamble ?
Damon White, Brent Renouf, John Butcher, Daniel Stewart, Paul Koulouriotis*. When has it ever worked?... About time we were patient with a KPP ....
That’s actually his fourth game in a row like yesterdayI'm OK with Marshall working his way into it but a couple more games like yesterday's and he should make way for Frampton (If he's performing)
In long-term development terms, not in next-week's-game terms.
Maybe improves Marshall development ?
Now I'm not suggesting this is happening , but needs to know that you need to want it, talent is irrelevant if your not doing the hard work. As long as he isn't listening to the talk how good he is, how good he is and training and just expecting it to all happen for him. May teach him about how hard you need to work.
I was going to respond to this, but yeah, what raman and Schulzenfest said:Neade didn't have extended runs, he played badly he got dropped. Sam Gray's late 2018 run was a dud I agree, but he had a very good 2017 and first third of 2018 to rest on. Marshall has nothing besides impressive Family Day performances and 3 goal v Freo last year when everyone feasted out.
Uh...
He. Played. Five. Consecutive. Games. Last. Year. Without. A. Single. Goal. And. Didn't. Get. Dropped.
Ignoring the posts which don't suit your argument won't make them go away.
4 goals versus Freo actually. 3 the next week versus the Swans at the SCG. 2 goals later in the year against Carlton. And it would've been two goals last week too if Westhoff hadn't marked a kick in the goalsquare which would've been a goal if he'd just let it go.
The guy you're advocating bringing in for him has only kicked multiple goals once in his career, and that's even before getting to the point that dropping Marshall for Farrell would completely wreck our structure.
Sometimes I read your posts and have no idea what team you watch every week. This is definitely one of those times.
I meant how has he been going as a forward replacement for Marshall... he is clearly never going to make it as an AFL ruckman, so his ruck work around the ground is irrelevant to the discussion.Sco
red a couple of goals in the scratch match against the crows. Against West Adelaide, played in ruck and was amongst the best. Did a lot more around the ground than Marshall ever has.
While agree with you, the point is he is performing what is asked of him. Anyway, I don’t think he will be considered. But Marshall is being carried.I meant how has he been going as a forward replacement for Marshall... he is clearly never going to make it as an AFL ruckman, so his ruck work around the ground is irrelevant to the discussion.
If you're really going to fight Marshall's corner you could have pointed out it was 4 goals v Freo R1 2018, not 3 as I said. I mean I was wide open there. But not worth going back and editing at the moment.I was going to respond to this, but yeah, what raman and Schulzenfest said:
I seriously can't believe people are suggesting Frampton against Brisbane.
When has dropping a forward, especially a tall forward, back to the reserves ever, EVER helped them regain form???
Rucks or midfielders who can get their own ball, great. Defenders who can mop up inferior delivery into the opponent's forward line, have at it. Even small forwards who can proactively position and crumb forward entries, maybe.
But tall forwards more than any other player on the ground are dependent on the skill levels of those around them and the delivery they generate. Playing against inferior opponents is not going to run them into form if they don't get the ball, which often happens because they don't get the quality supply they are used to.
I think playing Marshall in the two while developing his game and adjusting to the new gameplan is a horrible idea. And to replace him with a makeshift forward like Frampton even worse. Move him around the ground, up the ground, get him involved. These strategies often are more sound than dropping a key forward a level.
I am concerned about the Marshall/Ryder combination, largely because Ryder lives for playing ruck, and everything else flows from that. So there is a case for playing Frampton or Howard up forward (not by replacing Ryder at this stage, maybe replacing a small because Marshall is agile enough to play small and the ruck duo concept is working a treat), so do that by all means, but not at Marshall's expense at this stage. He would have to have more bad games in good conditions before I would be considering the questionable strategy of letting him find form in the Magpies.
Brisbane deserve to go into this match as favourites.
They were tough to beat at the Gabba last year and will be even tougher this year.