I suspect some of our decisions were driven by the weakness of the 2011 draft. Note that the weakness of the draft is also the only reason why Symes survived to spend the 2012 season on our list.Makes you wonder why we recruited them then as never were stars but certainly something in Lynch coaches dont like .
Vader seems 3 years a long time to wait for someone to re produce the form that we over paid him for and really apart from that kick which seems to have vanished does not offer a lot else especially attack on the ball and opposition.
It is not about getting better value in trade as we get what AFL says we get.
St Kilda's youth development under Lyons was nothing short of abysmal. I'm not surprised that they thought they could turn Lynch's career around. I think he showed a bit in the games he played, but he's still very raw and needs a lot of work.
As for Johnston, I think they probably regard that trade as a nil-all result. Armstrong was never going to go anywhere while on Adelaide's list, so we lost nothing by trading him for Johnston, even if he barely plays a game. Either way, Johnston was still a better option than a mid-late pick in the 2011 draft.




