Preview Changes vs Carlton

[beetz]

If there is a surprise omission it might be Sutcliffe. Afl.com.au has an article about what players in each team lead their team for disposals resulting in opposition scores. Sutcliffe was up there in terms of the entire league with his turnovers costing 32 points. Hill was our leading turnover player.

Wouldn't read too much in to it. McGovern aka plasticine shoulders for WC costs 25 points but I doubt they'll be dropping him.

 

[Grape Bear]

Not long to go now... Cue the melts!

 

[DaveLister]

"Fremantle have named Darcy Tucker, Brady Grey and Zac Clarke as part of an extended squad for their clash against Carlton on Sunday."

http://www.fremantlefc.com.au/news/2016-04-21/tabtouch-squad

 

[wayToGo_]

Tucker, Grey and Clarke all in the squad.

 

[go_the_dockers]

Check out @AFL_PKeane's Tweet:

 

[DaveLister]

full extended bench is:

• 17 Hayden Crozier
• 26 Ed Langdon
• 18 Darcy Tucker
• 28 Brady Grey
• 5 Garrick Ibbotson
• 8 Nick Suban
• 30 Zac Clarke

 

[meima]

full extended bench is:

• 17 Hayden Crozier
• 26 Ed Langdon
• 18 Darcy Tucker
• 28 Brady Grey
• 5 Garrick Ibbotson
• 8 Nick Suban
• 30 Zac Clarke

Grey, Langdon,suban out tommorow.

 

[theGav56]

full extended bench is:

• 17 Hayden Crozier
• 26 Ed Langdon
• 18 Darcy Tucker
• 28 Brady Grey
• 5 Garrick Ibbotson
• 8 Nick Suban
• 30 Zac Clarke

The only one on that bench I want out is Suban. If Clarke comes in I would lose Taberner.

 

[StingBitten]

ZOMG both Grey and Tucker named again, Suban and Sutcliffe to go?!?

 

[salim malik]

ZOMG both Grey and Tucker named again, Suban and Sutcliffe to go?!?

If thats the bench Tabs and Sutcliffe in the side

 

[wayToGo_]

If Tucker doesn't make the 22 I'll need my own melt thread.

 

[meima]

If Tucker doesn't make the 22 I'll need my own melt thread.

Langdon will be dropped but I rather ibbo if Johnson playing loose man.

 

[freo for life]

Ibbo and Suban out that's what I want to see, both have been a massive liability this year and Sutty isn't far behind them.
I can't see us playing two 1st gamers so one of Tucker and Grey will play.
Bench i want to see= Crozier, Langdon, Clarke , Tucker

 

[DaveLister]

Potential changes i see from the extended bench:

1. Grey in for Suban
2. Tucker in for either Croz or Langdon
3. Clarke in, A.Pearce full time key defender, MJ intercept player, Ibbo out

 

[serial_thrilla]

I can't see us playing two 1st gamers so one of Tucker and Grey will play.

Grey would be a second gamer.

 

[dewah07]

no mundy?

is the champ ever coming back?

 

[DaveLister]

no mundy?

is the champ ever coming back?

It was announced early yesterday that he wouldn't play this weekend.
Likely for next round.

 

[Stuart88]

The only guys that should be losing their spots are underperforming senior players that need to go back to wafl and learn how to kick/handball with some sort of efficiency. I don't want to see langdon, crozier, taberner etc. dropped

 

[Cheesewheel]

Don't want to see Langdon dropped. Kid's shown a willingness to run hard and take the game on at league level to keep persisting with.

 

[Big Animal]

surprised if we go with two rucks. Expect one to go, plus Grey won't make the cut. Tucker to come in but not sure who will be dropped - maybe Tabearcayneun?

 

[StingBitten]

So the emergencies won't play for Peel this weekend?

If that's true then Tucker would most likely be named, because if not he wouldn't have played for a full 3 weeks.

You'd also think Clarke is named to play if he's an emergency as opposed to finding form in the WAFL (reckon he needs a long stint in Peel).

I really, really hope neither Langdon or Crozier are dropped - we have to persist with Crozier and Langdon's currently at where Lachie Weller was 5 games ago.

 

[meima]

So the emergencies won't play for Peel this weekend?

If that's true then Tucker would most likely be named, because if not he wouldn't have played for a full 3 weeks.

You'd also think Clarke is named to play if he's an emergency as opposed to finding form in the WAFL (reckon he needs a long stint in Peel).

I really, really hope neither Langdon or Crozier are dropped - we have to persist with Crozier and Langdon's currently at where Lachie Weller was 5 games ago.

Peel do need grey there if not I think peel will lost to Claremont a lot.

 

[Van_Dyke]

So the emergencies won't play for Peel this weekend?

If that's true then Tucker would most likely be named, because if not he wouldn't have played for a full 3 weeks.

You'd also think Clarke is named to play if he's an emergency as opposed to finding form in the WAFL (reckon he needs a long stint in Peel).

I really, really hope neither Langdon or Crozier are dropped - we have to persist with Crozier and Langdon's currently at where Lachie Weller was 5 games ago.

I'd assume one or two of the emergencies will play for Peel.

 

[DaveLister]

So the emergencies won't play for Peel this weekend?

If that's true then Tucker would most likely be named, because if not he wouldn't have played for a full 3 weeks.

You'd also think Clarke is named to play if he's an emergency as opposed to finding form in the WAFL (reckon he needs a long stint in Peel).

I really, really hope neither Langdon or Crozier are dropped - we have to persist with Crozier and Langdon's currently at where Lachie Weller was 5 games ago.

More often the case for home games is 2 of the emergencies will play for the 2s while one is the only real emergency

 

[Deveraux]

So the emergencies won't play for Peel this weekend?

If that's true then Tucker would most likely be named, because if not he wouldn't have played for a full 3 weeks.

You'd also think Clarke is named to play if he's an emergency as opposed to finding form in the WAFL (reckon he needs a long stint in Peel).

I really, really hope neither Langdon or Crozier are dropped - we have to persist with Crozier and Langdon's currently at where Lachie Weller was 5 games ago.

Give the bloke a break, he knocked his knee in the first bounce of Round 1.
Hard to judge form from that.