Gaffy Duck
All Australian
Blues fans are certainly chirpy
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Absolutely- Teague has them playing good football.I don’t mind the Blue Baggers. Think it’ll be a ripping contest
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I think your right.Give it to them.
Been a long time since they won 3 in a row.
Just like Norf, we’ll give them a little what for
thought you'd be more into giving them a Big what for...?Give it to them.
Been a long time since they won 3 in a row.
Just like Norf, we’ll give them a little what for
Reasonable question.I love Ryan but does he do enough over four quarters?
I love Ryan but does he do enough over four quarters?
Theres glass half emptySeriously man, do you ever think the Eagles could win a game of footy? It's fu**en tedious.
Sneezes big knock is his lack of reapeat efforts and defensive.running. Giving him a week to turn into a targger to run with one of the best players in the comp while we have 2 proven taggers seems a little like shoehorning a round peg onto a square hole.Get Sneeze to shadow Yeo at training this week and then get him in the side to tag Cripps. Kinda like Silvagni against Fyfe.
Out: Waterman, Watson
In: Ah Chee, Hurn
I think he does as much if not more then Rioli. And definitely does more then petrol and Cameron. Only thing he needs to work on is his set shots and easy shots at goals he seems to miss a lot. A lot less selfish then Rioli, petch and Cameron aswellI love Ryan but does he do enough over four quarters?
Seemed to be doing a fair bit of jogging today
Yep agree on this. Once Hutch comes in ( after a week of WAFL IMO) Nelson goes back until Duggan replaces him, assuming no other injuries.Out: Cameron, Watson
In: Ah Chee, Hurn
Cameron 0 goals and 12 possessions total
Also not convinced Nelson & Hutch should be in the same side. One or the other as a tagger.
I disagree. I've been a huge critic of Hutch on here but have come around on him a bit lately. That said he's in the side for his tagging and he's not great when he's left on a flank or in the middle. When he's in the middle, we have too many plodders (Sheed/Redden/Masto).The good thing about Nelson and Hutchings is that we know they can offer a bit of flexibility, back and forward respectively. Having either of them in the team on a flank allows us a bit more flexibility in the midfield if matchups aren't working like they should.
For this reason, I'd be pretty happy having both of them in the team with specific roles in mind. It offers a lot of flexibility for the coaches to switch things up.
What you for wanting Allen out? Yeah I agreeNFI.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, I don't want him as a prime mover. But I don't mind him at all as an accountable forward who can push up the ground, links up well enough - kicks best when he's closer to goal. And having the option to go a hard tag is great, cos he's one of the best in the business at that.I disagree. I've been a huge critic of Hutch on here but have come around on him a bit lately. That said he's in the side for his tagging and he's not great when he's left on a flank or in the middle. When he's in the middle, we have too many plodders (Sheed/Redden/Masto).
Thought he was average when he tried playing Masto's role earlier in the year.
Especially with the matchups this week. Simpson is in the top 2 or 3 for the blues.Yeah, I don't want him as a prime mover. But I don't mind him at all as an accountable forward who can push up the ground, links up well enough - kicks best when he's closer to goal. And having the option to go a hard tag is great, cos he's one of the best in the business at that.
No doubt he still has his limitations. But he's proven to me at least that he knows what they are, and can work within them most of the time.
Reckon he will come in for Waterman.