Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At least you know Mitch Brown will put his body on the line. That one handed effort from TMac was pathetic.TMac's been good until the weekend, and he does deserve another week.
He's on notice though, would rather Mitch Brown or a half-fit Majak Daw than the dross he served up on Sunday.
Cats don't play fast rebound though they slow the game down, if anything we need more players who can pick off targets.
I honestly have no idea what the best option is
Don't worry about what the cats are doing, we've gotta play our Brand TM
Question though? If a bloke had 0 touches in the 3 games but Pickett Gawn and Lever had dragged them along you'd leave them in?Go in unchanged. Hibberd for Jetta maybe. We're top 1 or 2 in pressure acts in all categories, so don't go messing with a winning formula until we have to i guess..
I personally think everyone is playing their role. Our forward half pressure is #1 in the comp. Sparrow is a part of that. He's averaging 19 pressure acts a game (most of them in the front half) compared to Melksham 10 from last year. Sparrow averaging 4 score involvements a game so far compared to Melksham 3.5 from last year. Shots at goal is similar averages with Melk 1.6 to Sparrow 1. Tackles Sparrow 3.5(1 inside 50) to Melk 1.4(0.5 inside 50). Covid affected for Melk, but he hasn't set the world on fire since 2018 tbf.Question though? If a bloke had 0 touches in the 3 games but Pickett Gawn and Lever had dragged them along you'd leave them in?
I'm all for developing a team and developing chemistry but you can't just blindly carry blokes because we win, when if GWS had kicked 6 goals in the last we'd be calling to drop 6 blokes.
Sparrows on high notice, it's all well and good to tackle and pressure but 1 goal and 27 disposals for the season is pretty ineffective.
If Melksham can hit 5 targets inside 50 how much is Sparrows 5 tackles really worth?
I think there is 3 spots fritch brown weedI think TMac, Fritsch, Weed and Brown all battle for 2 spots. Can't have more than 2 in there.
Brown and Weed as two main keys, Jackson ruck forward with Gawn resting in the goalsqaure. Fritsch plays as a link up half forward similar to Tom Lynch at Adelaide. I think that works.I think there is 3 spots fritch brown weed
No current season stats available
I reckon that the limited interchanges has affected their old legs more that any other team. Since the first game of the season, they've looked slow.Watched Geelong on Monday - I must say I'll be disappointed if we lose to them. Horrible style of play. Chris Scott reminds me of Goodwin in his inability to change strategy when challenged. They should be 0-3 so we should be going in quietly confident but also wary that they have a lot of talent. But their game plan is horrid.
It's a very good argument mate I don't disagreeI personally think everyone is playing their role. Our forward half pressure is #1 in the comp. Sparrow is a part of that. He's averaging 19 pressure acts a game (most of them in the front half) compared to Melksham 10 from last year. Sparrow averaging 4 score involvements a game so far compared to Melksham 3.5 from last year. Shots at goal is similar averages with Melk 1.6 to Sparrow 1. Tackles Sparrow 3.5(1 inside 50) to Melk 1.4(0.5 inside 50). Covid affected for Melk, but he hasn't set the world on fire since 2018 tbf.
Sparrow is on the short list for changes no doubt, but for me the one who is under the pump is Jones. Similar numbers to Melk last year. Not quite getting enough of the ball or scoring enough to makeup for his low pressure numbers. I think if anyone comes out for Melk, it should be Jones. But i can't see that happening until his 300th. Maybe make him sub next game and try Melk? I don't think we lose anything.
Jetta is the other one i guess. May had to go to Greene as Jetta couldn't go with him. He is however still in the elite category for 1on1's and one percenters and going at over 85% efficiency but Hibberd is quicker and provides more drive out of defence. I'm reluctant to change anything because i think they are all playing a role and 83 shots on goal to 49 suggests we are winning these games easily, just not converting as well as we should. We should have had 3 eight goal victories tbh.
I personally think everyone is playing their role. Our forward half pressure is #1 in the comp. Sparrow is a part of that. He's averaging 19 pressure acts a game (most of them in the front half) compared to Melksham 10 from last year. Sparrow averaging 4 score involvements a game so far compared to Melksham 3.5 from last year. Shots at goal is similar averages with Melk 1.6 to Sparrow 1. Tackles Sparrow 3.5(1 inside 50) to Melk 1.4(0.5 inside 50). Covid affected for Melk, but he hasn't set the world on fire since 2018 tbf.
Sparrow is on the short list for changes no doubt, but for me the one who is under the pump is Jones. Similar numbers to Melk last year. Not quite getting enough of the ball or scoring enough to makeup for his low pressure numbers. I think if anyone comes out for Melk, it should be Jones. But i can't see that happening until his 300th. Maybe make him sub next game and try Melk? I don't think we lose anything.
Jetta is the other one i guess. May had to go to Greene as Jetta couldn't go with him. He is however still in the elite category for 1on1's and one percenters and going at over 85% efficiency but Hibberd is quicker and provides more drive out of defence. I'm reluctant to change anything because i think they are all playing a role and 83 shots on goal to 49 suggests we are winning these games easily, just not converting as well as we should. We should have had 3 eight goal victories tbh.
Is Bowey anywhere near a call up?