Preview Changes vs Collingwood (MCG)

[Ishmael_]

I disagree.

Firstly due to his good record - he won't be facing any additional time off.

Secondly - the difference in carry over points is largely meaningless. 26.5 or 68.8. These expire within a year anyway.

But lets assume another incident occurs. Then the additional carryover only has impact when the charge is either 80pts or 225pts. At 125 or 325 the outcome is the same.

For someone like lecras - he is rarely going to be suspended - I'd run the gauntlet and have the extra carryover for 12 months and have a crack at having him available for COllingwood.

While I agree with the sentiment, surely costs and the like have to come into it as well. Higher an SC, debate with the tribunal, mount a defence. Wouldn't get much change out of a couple grand and waisted man hours. Surely this sort of thing comes into it as well.

 

[Scotland]

I am liking the shutdown jobs Scooter has been doing.

wat.

Ward had 29 touches yesterday. I haven't been impressed with Selwood's defensive game at all recently.

 

[Hap Hapablap]

so how the **** did roughhead get level 1 while lecras got level 2.

def think itll be challenged.

 

[The Falcon Strike]

While I agree with the sentiment, surely costs and the like have to come into it as well. Higher an SC, debate with the tribunal, mount a defence. Wouldn't get much change out of a couple grand and waisted man hours. Surely this sort of thing comes into it as well.

Not sure a club as resource rich as hours should be too worried about non-capped expenditure

Only last week it showed we receive $6m in membership revenue than the next team - put that towards a defence.

It isn't as though Adam Simpson or the other players are going to be distracted or have time wasted

 

[The Falcon Strike]

so how the **** did roughhead get level 1 while lecras got level 2.

def think itll be challenged.

Because Roughead stayed low and wasn't late.

Lecca came slightly of the ground after the ball had left.

That's the difference between negligent and reckless and the different gradings.

 

[placebo]

Out: Lecras, Hutchings

In: Colledge, Tunbridge

 

[mick06]

Because Roughead stayed low and wasn't late.

Lecca came slightly of the ground after the ball had left.

That's the difference between negligent and reckless and the different gradings.

Yeh its hard to argue with reckless low and high thats how i would have summed it up.
At least he wont break his arm against the pies

 

[SloppyJoe]

wat.

Ward had 29 touches yesterday. I haven't been impressed with Selwood's defensive game at all recently.

Only 8 kicks though. Maybe it was the beers, but I don't recall Ward's touches being that great.

Scooter had a good game on Fyfe last week after being moved to him from Q2 onwards.

 

[ChampRevesby]

Stupid Lecca, really stupid.

Out: Lecca
In: Tunners

 

[Broken_Chairs]

sheed in plz

 

[Xsess]

Out: Lecras
In: Lycett

We were too short on the weekend. Plus our forwardline cant work with Kennedy as our primary focal point and leading into space.

 

[Dark Sharks]

Well on the bright side, at least Lecras wont be pantsed by Harry O'brien.

Darls on Toovey is also a bit of a bogey matchup that tends to not work for us.

 

[Bleedblueandgold]

Out: LeCras, Hutchings
In: Tunbridge, Colledge
Sub: Gaff

 

[Eaglemaniac]

Out: LeCras
In: Tunners

That should be the only change from the weekend. Let the current team learn to play together and find some form then get Lecca back in as soon as he's able.

 

[The Falcon Strike]

Out: Lecca, Cripps
In: Sinclair, Lycett

I think we can expose their defence with some quality talls.

 

[southcoast]

I would have thought Josh Hill was Le Cras' ready made replacement. If Hill brings his 'A' game he can fill the gap - the question is, "Will he bring his A game?"

 

[Chris_6678]

Hill will be good as a forward option but we need someone who can rotate into the midfield.

 

[WereFlyingHigh4]

sheed in plz

I'd actually rather him than Hutch in the team but his WAFL form maybe wont put him into consideration. Would be a good experience for him if he had a full game against Collingwood though.

 

[Eastern Rangers]

I would have thought Josh Hill was Le Cras' ready made replacement. If Hill brings his 'A' game he can fill the gap - the question is, "Will he bring his A game?"

His "A game"? he doesn't have an A game.

 

[Bleedblueandgold]

Hill was okay for a bit 2 weeks ago, kicked a crumbing goal early and 2 from marks later on. If he plays more like that rather than how he played against the Tigers, he could be handy.

 

[Tracker 101]

I'd actually rather him than Hutch in the team but his WAFL form maybe wont put him into consideration. Would be a good experience for him if he had a full game against Collingwood though.

We have about 306 backmen we could bring in.
Maybe it's time we gave Bennell a run up forward.
He looked pretty classy in kicking that goal a couple of weeks ago.
We can easily cover him down back for one week.

 

[Daveismad]

We go for another midfielder and rotate different players forward

Collingwood midfield depth is pretty good, we will ned as much midfield depth as much as possible

I think pick our best midfielder from outside this current group

We need to win this game ...this is not a game we pick an untried kid or three or four game player

Bring Ellis into the 21 and maybe sheed as sub

 

[Mighty Eagles]

OUT: Le Cras (sus), Gaff

IN: McGinnity, Butler

 

[Bob Fossil]

Hill is a massive 10kg bag of spuds that you get from the spud shed. People need to forget 2012 or whenever it was. The moon was in Aquarius and a waxing Jupiter saw him able to play ok football.

 

[PRANKSTER666]

After Hill's game against Port he should never play for us again.