Yeah I should really scroll up before posting eh. I’d never ignore you Dancing Potato!Jamurp got Dancing Potato on ignore. I didn't see that coming.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah I should really scroll up before posting eh. I’d never ignore you Dancing Potato!Jamurp got Dancing Potato on ignore. I didn't see that coming.
Yeah I should really scroll up before posting eh. I’d never ignore you Dancing Potato!
I've been able to use my AFL membership four times this season I reckon. I wonder how much they'll offer to refund, given last year was $150 just to keep the progress towards goldSo we won’t be able to attend this game either?
In house after match interview . At first i thought he had just made a mistake , seems he was right .Where did Gus say this? Would doubt he'd be more privvy to major fixture changes which no one in the media has picked up.
His role seems to be, and I say this with the greatest respect, chief headbutter. Its little wonder Oliver and Petracca lose their connection when he's in there with them. I have been a Harmes critic in the past, but you don't see him jumping into every single ruck contest. He holds his ground and defends a man.Someone on another forum went through Vineys involvement against the Hawks . To summarize was ok in the first q , 2nd & 3rd q not good , brief appearance in the last before disappearing . Involved in (directly or indirectly) 7 turnovers against us .
I have no idea what his role is , he gets caught with the ball quite often now , and as i said during the game would he still be in the team if his name was not Viney . Will be interested to see how long he is allowed to perform like this without being dropped ( managed or whatever ) .
He was not the only one who had a dog afternoon , and not the sole reason we drew , but it is becoming harder to justify his spot atm.
I can't see him getting dropped, unfortunately.Someone on another forum went through Vineys involvement against the Hawks . To summarize was ok in the first q , 2nd & 3rd q not good , brief appearance in the last before disappearing . Involved in (directly or indirectly) 7 turnovers against us .
I have no idea what his role is , he gets caught with the ball quite often now , and as i said during the game would he still be in the team if his name was not Viney . Will be interested to see how long he is allowed to perform like this without being dropped ( managed or whatever ) .
He was not the only one who had a dog afternoon , and not the sole reason we drew , but it is becoming harder to justify his spot atm.
In house after match interview . At first i thought he had just made a mistake , seems he was right .
Not officially yet that i know of .Is there another source that is confirming this?
I can't see him getting dropped, unfortunately.
He's always lauded by coaching group for his toughness. But the eye test, and what you've posted, tell a far worse picture. The 3 times he was running towards 50 and bombed to top of square was hideous. It rebounded out even faster than it went in.
He's been one of my favourite players for a long time, purely because I've never doubted him cracking in. We've moved past effort though, from 2013/14 days.
When he was out of the team, I thought we missed his toughness and contested work. But he's reaching Dom Tyson levels of infuriating turnover/retention.
Not only does he get in the way, but he doesn't defend well enough either now.Great post. I love him as a player too but I reckon we’ve moved past him playing significant onball minutes. He just gets in the way of Oliver and Petracca these days.
I can't remember what melt changes I made in the other thread but I agree with the above. Oh yes it was AVB out.in: Harmes, Melksham
out: Viney (won't happen) Jackson to rotate off the bench instead of FP