Changes vs Essendon

[roos_fanatic08]

No stanton and no Ryder should give us the edge! Huge huge game!

 

[Hard_to_Beat]

Any outside chance Azza will come in, so we have the flexibility to send Lachie back to cover Gumbles? Not sure if Thommo can cover Gumby's height, and we may need him to go to Crameri. Thoughts?

Gumbleton has taken 3 contested marks out of 21 marks.

I'd be much more concerned with the supply line.

 

[DarwinRoo]

as is yours, are you related to him or something? you seem to really like him

Yeah because liking a player automatically means you are related to him.

I know I am related to Lachie Hansen, Lindsay Thomas and Majak Daw.

 

[The Nostradamus]

Yeah because liking a player automatically means you are related to him.

I know I am related to Lachie Hansen, Lindsay Thomas and Majak Daw.

no but constantly talking up and liking someone for no real reason is quite strange

 

[DarwinRoo]

no but constantly talking up and liking someone for no real reason is quite strange

No stranger than bagging a player for weeks on end.

 

[Hard_to_Beat]

In: Levi & Patch
Out: J-Mac & Fish

 

[The Phenom]

Any outside chance Azza will come in, so we have the flexibility to send Lachie back to cover Gumbles? Not sure if Thommo can cover Gumby's height, and we may need him to go to Crameri. Thoughts?

It seems a little odd that he was included in the squad, makes me think they might have something like you've mentioned in mind. Hope he gets another chance, he was dealt a pretty harsh hand IMO.

 

[Saintly31]

no but constantly talking up and liking someone for no real reason is quite strange

I think the same, it is strange.

No stranger than bagging a player for weeks on end.

It's not strange to request a players omission when they underperform for "weeks on end".

 

[DarwinRoo]

He wasn't dealt with harshly. He kicked 3 goals in 4 weeks.

 

[The Phenom]

He wasn't dealt with harshly. He kicked 3 goals in 4 weeks.

Guess it's time to drop Hansen based on that logic..

 

[DarwinRoo]

I think the same, it is strange.



It's not strange to request a players omission when they underperform for "weeks on end".

It's strange to say said player had underperformed for weeks on end when the truth is actually the opposite. And calling for a players head after one poor game is strange.

 

[DarwinRoo]

Guess it's time to drop Hansen based on that logic..

But you would think that would be dealt with harshly wouldn't you?

 

[ThePezDispenser]

as is yours, are you related to him or something? you seem to really like him

I think the same, it is strange.

You two the same person?

 

[The Nostradamus]

You two the same person?

nope, 2 people have the same opinion so they must be the same person?

are you and darwin Roo the same person?

 

[ThePezDispenser]

nope, 2 people have the same opinion so they must be the same person?

are you and darwin Roo the same person?

The only two people to share that opinion....

 

[Husk]

Actually I agree JMac has been ordinary for a while as well.

 

[The Nostradamus]

The only two people to share that opinion....

wrong, i read in the other thread a few other people including BE who thought jmac should have a spell in the vfl for a few weeks.

 

[DarwinRoo]

wrong, i read in the other thread a few other people including BE who thought jmac should have a spell in the vfl for a few weeks.

A few weeks. You have been calling for his head for months.

 

[giantroo]

Don't know if people notice it or not, but Jmac is the one player who links well with atley. Watch most of our attacks, jmac and atley combine well. And they won't drop Jmac just for the sake of dropping him.

 

[ThePezDispenser]

wrong, i read in the other thread a few other people including BE who thought jmac should have a spell in the vfl for a few weeks.

A bit like Kangatime on Thomas you have lost all credibility on JMac matters!

 

[ThePezDispenser]

Don't know if people notice it or not, but Jmac is the one player who links well with atley. Watch most of our attacks, jmac and atley combine well. And they won't drop Jmac just for the sake of dropping him.

That's my argument

 

[Only Forwards]

Don't know if people notice it or not, but Jmac is the one player who links well with atley. Watch most of our attacks, jmac and atley combine well. And they won't drop Jmac just for the sake of dropping him.

GR this is no place for truth.

 

[The Nostradamus]

A few weeks. You have been calling for his head for months.

??? I wasn't referring to myself.
BE is big easy, a fellow north poster who among a few others called for jmac to be dropped this week

 

[Saintly31]

It's strange to say said player had underperformed for weeks on end when the truth is actually the opposite. And calling for a players head after one poor game is strange.

Actually, it isn't.

I doubt other than PezD that you would have too much support that JMac has been in excellent form. Whether he should be dropped is arguable, but its certainly not arguable regarding his form.

 

[DarwinRoo]

??? I wasn't referring to myself.
BE is big easy, a fellow north poster who among a few others called for jmac to be dropped this week

One week for others, you for months. Don't use their objective view of the team to back up your obsession with J-Mac's position in the team.