Opinion Changes Vs Gold Coast (Away) - Round 11

[Godfather32]

Gee what a ordinary draft

Danger the real standout

We did miss out on Chris Mayne though

 

[ziad]

What were the other options when Masten went 3 as a matter of interest?

Might have a look at that

somebody that can tackle. today if you cannot tackle you can not play
he isn't up to a contested game

 

[Biggie]

somebody that can tackle. today if you cannot tackle you can not play
he isn't up to a contested game

That's not an argument ziad.

"Somebody" doesn't cut it. Agree in Masten flaws, but we need to be able to present an argument.

 

[Godfather32]

That's not an argument ziad.

"Somebody" doesn't cut it. Agree in Masten flaws, but we need to be able to present an argument.

Never would have gone for Danger by the sounds of it, the only other decent mids taken were Ward and Steven, pretty poor draft for midfielders really.

 

[KO_KO]

Poor Masto, everyone should walk a mile in his adidas

Hope someone gets it

 

[BOND 007]

What does club think of lamb and venables based on what they have seen so far?

Lamb - potential very high, skills really good, great athlete. Needs to work on concentration.

Venables - highly skilled, potential to be A class mid. Needs to learn how to impact play continually rather than in spurts.

 

[Keys]

Lamb - potential very high, skills really good, great athlete. Needs to work on concentration.

Venables - highly skilled, potential to be A class mid. Needs to learn how to impact play continually rather than in spurts.

Are either, or both, considered significant flight risks?

Had a couple of opposition posters suggest they're unhappy and want to go home

 

[BOND 007]

That is why he keeps on keeping on. The decline though Bondy is there, and regardless of high esteem or not, Sheed must have more time (which I believe he is) in there, perhaps even Duggan (although I'm not as bullish on Liam as others) and we develop our kids ie Partington, DV and Karps.

Thanks as always for the insight, we can be a fickle bunch.

PS - Recruitment team must be disappointed with Jack Redden? Bust that one, you would say, considering the cost?

There are certainly others who were selected later who have impacted more to this point.

 

[KO_KO]

There are certainly others who were selected later who have impacted more to this point.

Love your work mate.

 

[BOND 007]

Are either, or both, considered significant flight risks?

Had a couple of opposition posters suggest they're unhappy and want to go home

Venables has another year. Lamb IMO is a possibility to request a transfer.

 

[BOND 007]

Love your work mate.

Tks

 

[Biggie]

There are certainly others who were selected later who have impacted more to this point.

Appreciate the response as always BOND 007, cheers

 

[KO_KO]

Tks

Just for you, nobody else look

 

[Keys]

Venables has another year. Lamb IMO is a possibility to request a transfer.

I hope we're in DV's ear about a contract extension

Also hope that we, and Chopper, persist as I get the sense that when/if it all comes together for him it might be something special

 

[Keys]

Nice pair of balloons KO_KO

 

[kaiserchief13]

Its probably because he is one of three pure inside mids we have. Redden and Hutching being the other two and both forced to play a defensive role or on an outside role.

They are forced to play defensive roles because Priddis is a ******* liability defensively! His opponent can get 5m away from him within a few strides

 

[KO_KO]

Nice pair of balloons KO_KO

I said dont look

 

[Keys]

I said dont look

You sound like my wife

 

[KO_KO]

You sound like my wife

I could be im 40 in june

 

[Godfather32]

I said dont look

I looked too, sorry not sorry

 

[Biggie]

Just for you, nobody else look

I'm not I'm not!!

 

[Bender_]

Have spent at least 5 minutes watching it.

 

[avishka5]

I could be im 40 in june

What a coincidence, keys wife is a 140 in June. Aw, keys is such a cradle snatcher.

 

[ziad]

That's not an argument ziad.

"Somebody" doesn't cut it. Agree in Masten flaws, but we need to be able to present an argument.

anybody that can tackle would be better value than masten - the argument is that simple

 

[Biggie]

anybody that can tackle would be better value than masten - the argument is that simple

All due respect, I can't buy into that buddy.

This isn't a defence of Masten, it's pointing out that "somebody" or "anybody" isn't an argument