I think it's time for a stengle.. would have been a great round to debut
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Unofficial Preview Changes vs GWS
- Thread starter TubbsFarquhar
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Aug 29, 2013
- 2,331
- 4,976
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
For all those calling for sauce to come back. Do you seriously think he will be any good against Mumford? He will get absolutely manhandled
Mummy was soundly beaten by Witts so I reckon ROB would do OK. He won't hurt us around the ground like Gawn.
- Jul 6, 2017
- 36,321
- 54,962
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
It is more the body strength. Sauce has it and o'brien is learning it..in the hitouts gawn won he was giving silver service to his team whereas he needed to be under more pressure when he was getting hand to ball to put him off. O'brien has time on his side but if i was a betting man i would bet on jacobs coming back in this week...especially against that gorilla mumford
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Gawn would have spanked Sauce.
RoB is our main Ruck now
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
RoB is our main Ruck now
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Sauce is not ready needs another run in the SANFL, while he was good in the ruck on SAT his game time in the middle was limited and he spent time up Forward When he can run 80% game time in the SANFL ruck then OK.
Also, After this game we have a 5-day break followed by a 15-day break, If you were going to rest ROB then the Richmond game would be the one. and give a good 2 weeks rest.
Also, After this game we have a 5-day break followed by a 15-day break, If you were going to rest ROB then the Richmond game would be the one. and give a good 2 weeks rest.
Team won if there ate any changes it would be those ones which will happen automatically like mcrouch or those pushing their case like Sauce or douglas who showed great form or maybe harto to stop the gws talls. Would suggest only two out that 4 mentioned though
On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
- May 16, 2015
- 19,176
- 27,071
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- WWTFC,Chelsea,Glasgow Celtic,Lech Poznan
What is all this love for Stengle. He is just an opportunist forward. A lot of ball skill but basically a receiver . A good SANFL player at best, not a good tackler. Would Richmond have given him away if he the next Eddie, I think not.Murph's tackling power alone keeps him in.
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 95,347
- 104,941
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
In: Mrouch, Hartigan, McHenry
Out: Sloane, Atkins, Murphy
Matt if fit in for the injured Sloane.
Hartigan will be needed against their tall forward line, so replaces Mackay who replaces Atkins, who needs a swift boot up the arse. Wouldn't mind bringing in Jones for Mackay, but think we need his running power on the wing whilst Seed is underdone.
McHenry for Murphy as he has more upside. We need to give him a taste at least & whilst Murphy did some useful things, he isn't doing enough.
B: Brown, Talia, Hartigan
HB: Smith, Keath, Laird
C: Seedsman, Mrouch, Milera
HF: Lynch, Jenkins, Gallucci
F: Betts, Walker, Greenwood
R: O'Brien, Gibbs, Brouch
I: Kelly, CEY, Mackay, McHenry
Out: Sloane, Atkins, Murphy
Matt if fit in for the injured Sloane.
Hartigan will be needed against their tall forward line, so replaces Mackay who replaces Atkins, who needs a swift boot up the arse. Wouldn't mind bringing in Jones for Mackay, but think we need his running power on the wing whilst Seed is underdone.
McHenry for Murphy as he has more upside. We need to give him a taste at least & whilst Murphy did some useful things, he isn't doing enough.
B: Brown, Talia, Hartigan
HB: Smith, Keath, Laird
C: Seedsman, Mrouch, Milera
HF: Lynch, Jenkins, Gallucci
F: Betts, Walker, Greenwood
R: O'Brien, Gibbs, Brouch
I: Kelly, CEY, Mackay, McHenry
Could pose an Argument for 3 changes, as we did not play well, So they could justify 3 changes. 4 may be asking too much,
Hartigan for MacKay better balance against GWS,
M Crouch when Fit is the first player selected. for Sloane (hamstring injury)
But I reckon Douglas aggression, run and Attitude may push him in for a spot against GWS. Question is who does he replace. there are several choices.
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 95,347
- 104,941
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
the universal
Norm Smith Medallist
- Jun 20, 2015
- 7,060
- 8,680
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
An opportunist forward who regularly kicks goals, and Richmond have something like half a dozen players who can play a small forward role - hence he's here, too much competition. He's 4th on the SANFL goalkickers, only two goals behind the leader too.
Your opinion is noted but will not be that of the proffessionals
McHenry wont be brought in to such an emprmous game against quality opposition, which would be my opinion aswell as the professionals
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 95,347
- 104,941
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
Lol, you may be a "proffessional", but I'm a professional.. & have 3 qualifications to prove it!
PS. So you were happy with Murphy's game? You obviously have low unprofessional standards.
Developing nicely in the SANFL, if only he had kicked straighter......
In Crouch
Out Sloane inj
In Sauce
Out Walker
In McHenry
Out Atkins
In Douglas
Out Mackay
F. Murphy Sauce Betts
Hf Douglas JJ Lynch
C. Gibbs Crouch Seeds
Hb Laird Keath Smith
B. Milera Talia. Brown
Ruck. Rob Crouch. Cey
Inter McHenry greenwood Kelly Gallucci
Out Sloane inj
In Sauce
Out Walker
In McHenry
Out Atkins
In Douglas
Out Mackay
F. Murphy Sauce Betts
Hf Douglas JJ Lynch
C. Gibbs Crouch Seeds
Hb Laird Keath Smith
B. Milera Talia. Brown
Ruck. Rob Crouch. Cey
Inter McHenry greenwood Kelly Gallucci
Then your proffesional opinion will be wrong in my opinionLol, you may be a "proffessional", but I'm a professional.. & have 3 qualifications to prove it!
PS. So you were happy with Murphy's game? You obviously have low unprofessional standards.
As those proffesionals getting paid unlike yourself wont agree with your so called proffesional opinion in your eyes
On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
- Oct 3, 2003
- 26,916
- 30,913
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Soft spot for Brisbane
What?
You win the game by KICKING GOALS.
Stengle is VASTLY more talented than Murphy, who is a lower league effort guy who's been given some opportunities.
To actually have a skilful crumbing forward in our forward line could be transformational for us.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
You dont rate Betts a lot of experts do, but you may be onto something maybe
On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
- Oct 3, 2003
- 26,916
- 30,913
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Soft spot for Brisbane
LOL, I rate Betts - but he doesn't spend much time at the front of packs.
GetInMyVanBerlo
All Australian
- Sep 11, 2014
- 861
- 1,703
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
That's just not true, Kelly is incredibly more damaging.
Simmo28
Premiership Player
And about the same time he did a similar move with a handball to Lynch for goal. Tex played well, lots of score involvement and was there for the kick at 50-70m and our smalls played off him well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Kane McGoodwin
Make me an Admin!
- May 21, 2001
- 95,347
- 104,941
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Crows
So you ducked the question at hand - were you happy with Murphy's performance as he is the player I would replace with McHenry...
