Prediction Changes vs Hawksthorne

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

on the down side we showcase Ladhams to the rest of the comp who in turn drive up his price before he signs a new contract
 
I'm personally very disappointed for Garner, especially given he went out and not Broadbent.

But I will give marks to Ken for resisting the most "Ken" move he could have made, to not bring in Ladhams and instead just rotate ruck duties between Ryder and Frampton. Very happy Billy's being persisted with as a key forward in the absence of Lycett.
 
on the down side we showcase Ladhams to the rest of the comp who in turn drive up his price before he signs a new contract
I detest showing Clarkson any of our talent, especially hard to come by Tall Ruckmen.
Hawthorn steal players from other clubs after all the development has been done, that's how they stay competitive.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

In the scheme of selection issues, choosing half back flanker A over half back flanker B rates well down the list.
Yeah. I'm disappointed for Garner,. especially as it probably means Wingard (or Bruest, or Puopolo) will kick a bag but I'm too excited that for 2 weeks in a row Ken has backed in a tall forward structure to care.

I was sure he was going to make Frampton play 2nd ruck.

On SM-G960F using
BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Last edited:
Yeah. I'm disappointed for Garner,. especially as it probably means Wingard (or Bruest, or Puopolo) will kick a bag but I'm too excited that for 2 weeks in a row Ken has backed in a tall forward structure to care.

I was sure he was going to make Frampton play 2md ruck.

On SM-G960F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Ladham selected himself. Been too good to keep out.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top