Changes vs North

[SmokingGun]

Duffield dropped

 

[Lach72]

Duffield and Lower out, Faulks and Pearce out. Mundy's in with McPhee Palmer and Pitt

 

[Seppo]

Duffield and Lower out, Faulks and Pearce out. Mundy's in with McPhee Palmer and Pitt

Good ins... But wait, Hinkley gets another game? Surely that means he passed the ultimatum set to him last week. We might see him on our list next yer after all.

 

[Clay Davis]

Somewhat rough on Faulks, didn't think he was bad, but understand it based on the number of defensive talls we have.

Duffield was a long time coming.

 

[esquilax]

Lower out adding running players?

Are we planning a simple shoot-out at Docklands?

 

[DarkPhoenix]

For those of you who want to know the North lineup ill save you googling:

Backs B.Rawlings 3 S.Thompson 16 M.Firrito 11
Half Backs A.Mullett 41 N.Grima 17 D.Wells 8
Centreline M.Campbell 33 R.Bastinac 28 J.Ziebell 7
Half Forwards S.McMahon 42 L.Hansen 6 A.Edwards 27
Forwards L.Thomas 12 D.Petrie 20 B.Harvey 29
Followers T.Goldstein 22 K.Harper 23 A.Swallow 9
Interchange B.Cunnington 10 L.Greenwood 24 C.Garlett 32 C.Pedersen 39
Emergencies L.Adams 13 S.Atley 18 C.Richardson 21

In: N.Grima , L.Hansen , A.Mullett
Out: R.Tarrant (Knee) , S.Atley (Omitted) , C.Richardson (Omitted)
New: A.Mullett

 

[prattsta]

In: David Mundy, Rhys Palmer, Adam McPhee, Jayden Pitt
Out: Paul Duffield, Clancee Pearce, Peter Faulks, Nick Lower

FREMANTLE

B: Adam McPhee, Antoni Grover, Alex Silvagni
HB: Ryan Crowley, Luke McPharlin, Michael Johnson
C: Garrick Ibbotson, Greg Broughton, Nick Suban
HF: Nathan Fyfe, Christopher Mayne, Michael Barlow
F: Hayden Ballantyne, Matthew Pavlich, Tendai Mzungu
Foll: Aaron Sandilands, David Mundy, Stephen Hill

I/C: Rhys Palmer, Clayton Hinkley, Zachary Clarke, Jayden Pitt

Emg: Kepler Bradley, Peter Faulks, Nick Lower

 

[Lord Nicholson]

Surely Pav will play forward now?

...surely?

 

[prattsta]

I know we never line up as named, but that may be the most ******ed line-up I've seen all year. Seriously, WTF?

 

[prattsta]

Surely Pav will play forward now?

...surely?

Nah, he'll still rotate in and out of the forward line. Which is fine if the bulk of his time is spent forward. He's fine as an impact player through the midfield.

 

[yakka man]

I liked the look of Faulks but he is a lockdown defender and North don't have enough quality forwards for him to play on. Mcphee for Pearce I don't agree with. I'm glad to see Pitt get another game and Duffield deserved to be dropped (so have a lot of other players over the season though). However dropping Lower is stupid unless he is injured.

Does anyone else want to see Grffin, Sandi and Clarke play a game all together to see how it goes?

 

[Seppo]

That is a typical Harves smoke and mirrors line up.

Will Hill play on the ball though? I'd hope he gets some protection from McPhee and Crowley. Rawlings Could go to him again, but I'd love to see Hill match up against someone quick like Cruize Garlett. Could do his confidence wonders.

 

[Seppo]

Does anyone else want to see Grffin, Sandi and Clarke play a game all together to see how it goes?

I saw enough in the pre season comp to say it won't work. Unless we are playing a side like Essendon with a guaranteed 3 rucks Ryder Hille and Bellchambers.

 

[Teffy]

I'd love to see Hill match up against someone quick like Cruize Garlett. Could do his confidence wonders.

That would suit us fine. Cruize does virtually all of his work in heavy traffic and if Hill follows him in there, then I will see that as a win for us.

I expect Hill and Bastinac to go together.

Brady will get Ballantyne. We won't be letting him off the leash this time.

 

[prattsta]

Does anyone else want to see Grffin, Sandi and Clarke play a game all together to see how it goes?

Not particularly. It's something they might be able to work out over the pre-season, but I can't see it working.

 

[Reginald Perrin]

However dropping Lower is stupid unless he is injured.

Definitely looked hampered by something before being subbed out last game.

Does anyone else want to see Grffin, Sandi and Clarke play a game all together to see how it goes?

Yes, yes and yes.

 

[Reginald Perrin]

For those of you who want to know the North lineup ill save you googling:

No need to Google. I got your list off the back of a Weeties packet this morning.

 

[Bradesmaen]

Feel sorry for Faulks and Lower did play bad last week, he's been very inconsistent.

I think Palmer will be the sub for Mundy at some point. He's a better impact player and also coming off an injury.

 

[dominguez]

Interesting line up, Crowley and Hinkley stay in which is a bit disappointing but glad to see Duffield dropped.

I liked the look of Faulks but he is a lockdown defender and North don't have enough quality forwards for him to play on.

Personally I would have kept him in, swung Silvagni forward, and made Johnson the sub.

Mcphee for Pearce I don't agree with.

Pearce isn't up to AFL level and will be de-listed IMO. Not even an emergency this week.

I'm glad to see Pitt get another game and Duffield deserved to be dropped (so have a lot of other players over the season though).

Not sure on Pitt at this stage but agree with you reuffield.

However dropping Lower is stupid unless he is injured.

I think he'll play and Harvey is just sending a message after a poor game last week. Is in the 25 and I'll be surprised if he's not on the plane.

Does anyone else want to see Grffin, Sandi and Clarke play a game all together to see how it goes?

Not really, especially while Sandilands AND Griffin are coming back from injury.

 

[jmadrox]

it has arrived....

this is the result

 

[Parasite]

Hmm, north bring in A Mullett. Surely we have to bring back Clive for some serious Mullett on mullett action.

 

[prattsta]

I'd go with Pitt as the substitute, McPhee as the defensive forward and have Palmer play as the tagger.

 

[Sman-21]

Obviously Harvey really does believe we need more speed.
Doesnt matter how much or what they do........ just aslong as their fast
Thats why Hinkley stays in an Pitt returns.

 

[electricfeel]

Hinkley!?!?!?!?!??!!!?!!?!?!

I don't mind Pitt. He's been one of our more effective subs. Yay for Palmer!

 

[duncs]

Pitt looks the likely sub. I actually thought Hinkley looked alright as the sub last week, got into some good spaces and ran well.
Will be awesome to see Sandi, Mundy and Barlow back in the middle