It's a disgusting decision especially given wines' deliberate charge .. that was blatant
i know, but they are making an example of him.
hawkins got done for same thing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
It's a disgusting decision especially given wines' deliberate charge .. that was blatant

I just had a look. Still GA tickets available, but I'm pretty sure you cant use your membership.What's the go with tickets for this, can I just roll up with my membership? Going to drive up I think.
i know, but they are making an example of him.
hawkins got done for same thing
Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Chairman Ross Howie is reminding the jury before they consider their verdict that a strike can be delivered with an open hand.
He is also reminding them that 'intentional to strike' is what matters. Not whether Redpath intended to strike high or to the body
Nice work AFL
he is a dead man

AFL MRP & Tribunal @AFLTribunal·12m
Jeff Gleeson QC has argued Redpath delivered a "forceful blow", consistent with a striking motion.
224
https://mobile.twitter.com/AFLTribunal
Why are we not arguing insufficient force?
Or just hip and shoulder him at the next contest. Apparently that's also finered should have used his studs not his hand
That's this week. Next week it will be a contrasting message they send.If red gets done then the message the afl has sent this week is you can use a boot to someone's face, you can leave the ground and bump someone high and late but go fordbid you push someone with an open hand
Too hard to argue given Davis dived, would have to call him a diver and the tribunal would have to find he is a diver which they would not do.
I don't see how else he gets off.
The tribunal found Schofield not guilty because of insufficient force and weren't required to punish Oliver.
There was a hesitation from Oliver and I didn't mean they'd have to punish Davis they'd just basically call him a diver which they are too weak to do