Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Ladhams out is the right call but Hinkley's inability to manage two rucks without complete form drops is a never ending saga.
I don't think Charlie & Aliir are great long term chop out options & every Swans fan on Earth says he struggles when not settled down back, it's ok for Richmond as I said right call purely on Pete's form.We don't even need two rucks. We've got part-time ruck options all over the ground, just about every other team does it and there has really been no indication that playing two is an advantage. Especially if we aren't winning fu** all from winning the taps.
Congratulations on your impending debut Lachie! Couldn't pick a tougher opponent, hey?
Good to see Bergman’s been thrown to the curb after two games. Mayes isn’t the answer, Bergman could be. Dumb selection. Also confused bringing jones in ahead of Bergman. Bergman better with the ball at this stage. Jones has looked lost pre season.
Ollie likes having a digGood selection.
It will be interesting to see who chops out in ruck.
I think it will be Marshall.
Bergman at this stage is a better call than jones though. So why not play Bergman and have jones in as sub.think its more mayes will be the sub and might not get a run. where as bergman can get game time into him at sanfl level
Bergman is just finding his way he was hardly burning the house down he'll be back, Jones adds some aggression.Bergman at this stage is a better call than jones though. So why not play Bergman and have jones in as sub.
I guess that’s true, Jones will put his body on the line, haven’t seen that as much from bergs. doesn’t show much confidence in Bergs though from the coaches though Does it?Bergman is just finding his way he was hardly burning the house down he'll be back, Jones adds some aggression.
Can't agree with that, Hinkley isn't out there to take sitter marks for Ladhams, or beat a second ruckman. Ladhams was woefully poor last week, and not much better in round 1. If he wants that spot he has to do a lot more then what he currently gives. He is young if course but last week he was very poor in a poor side performance.Ladhams out is the right call but Hinkley's inability to manage two rucks in the side without complete form drops is a never ending saga.
I said it was the right call, Hinkley however can't get the best out of two rucks it's been a constant failure.Can't agree with that, Hinkley isn't out there to take sitter marks for Ladhams, or beat a second ruckman. Ladhams was woefully poor last week, and not much better in round 1. If he wants that spot he has to do a lot more then what he currently gives. He is young if course but last week he was very poor in a poor side performance.
I don't think so all he needs to do is perform at the maggies and he'll be in every selection conversation.I guess that’s true, Jones will put his body on the line, haven’t seen that as much from bergs. doesn’t show much confidence in Bergs though from the coaches though Does it?
Bergman at this stage is a better call than jones though. So why not play Bergman and have jones in as sub.
I said it was the right call, Hinkley however can't get the best out of two rucks it's been a constant failure.
Please no...Dusty would run rings around him up forwardI'm fine with Jones coming in if it's to play on Martin when he rests forward. Otherwise, whats the point?