- Sep 9, 2012
- 6,141
- 9,021
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
- Other Teams
- NE Patriots
- Thread starter
- #351
Sounds like the Crows are genuine in choosing to hold him to his contract
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would give my left nut to never ever hear Dwayne Russell call a lions game ever again.
Actually you can throw in the entire channel seven commentary team also.
It would be great if you had an option to mute the commentary and keep the game/crowd noise
"Lions must offer 2x1st rounders for Charlie Cameron. A player who wants to play at your club...a club that has had continued go-home issues" - Mitch Cleary on Twitter. Absolute muppet.
"This club has had retention issues in the past...therefore they need to massively overpay in any and all trades, that will help them"
Curious how last year Tom Mitchell was worth 14 and Brad Hill 23, but this year Cameron is worth 12 or even 18 + 19!
Noble will not give up our pick 12. I'd bet my lef hold the phone.. I'll eat my hat if he does.
"Charlie didn't have a great season," Young said.
"He played a couple good games during the year and played well in the finals.
"I suspect the thought process of going home and leaving Adelaide had an impact on him during the season, so I'd hate to suspect what would happen next year."
Its a nice change from being on the other end of this shyte.His manager sounds like a bit of a ******. I'm finding it hard to get excited about this trade when we've been on the other side of this shyte so often now.
Yep, should get done now. Especially when his manager says "he hates to see what will happen next year" (regarding how his form was affected this year)... basically a warningIt'll get done-
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-10-09/cameron-wont-ever-resign-with-adelaide-says-manager
ADELAIDE speedster Charlie Cameron has made it clear he won't be re-signing with the Crows beyond 2018 if a trade can't be done with the Brisbane Lions during this year's NAB AFL Trade Period.
The Crows are intent on the 23-year-old fulfilling the final year of his contract after he requested to join the Lions to be closer to his family.
Cameron's manager Colin Young told radio station FIVEaa he still held out hope a deal could be struck.
"Andrew (McDougall) and I spoke to (Cameron) this morning and he was fairly disappointed, but we just explained it's the nature of the beast and we just move forward," Young said.
"We've got 10 days to try and get something done.
"Charlie has indicated that he won't be re-signing with Adelaide after next year.
His manager sounds like a bit of a ******. I'm finding it hard to get excited about this trade when we've been on the other side of this shyte so often now.
Gees if cameron and schache last until the end of trade week, Cameron will be worth 3 first rounders and schache will be worth my mastiff's bagged up poop. I still can't work it out they both have the same issue. Homesickness. Yet cameron's value goes up and schaches goes down. It's phenomenon I am going to refer to as the " brisbane effect""Lions must offer 2x1st rounders for Charlie Cameron. A player who wants to play at your club...a club that has had continued go-home issues" - Mitch Cleary on Twitter. Absolute muppet.
"This club has had retention issues in the past...therefore they need to massively overpay in any and all trades, that will help them"
Perhaps Gillies shouldn't have signed such a length contract and he would have got to Hawthorn.I don't think it's just his manager. I saw an article on the AFL site yesterday about former Geelong player, Tom Gillies, on how his wish to get traded to the Hawks in 2011 got shutdown by the Cats because he was contracted. His then Manager said in the article that discussing trades for contracted players was frowned upon back then but these days they'd just force the issue and get it done. So I think it's an industry attitude more than anything.
Things change though. In the AFL climate the number of years is almost becoming more important than the monetary figure. You'd be mad not to sign a longer deal if you had the chance to.Perhaps Gillies shouldn't have signed such a length contract and he would have got to Hawthorn.
Then players shouldn't complain when they try moving mid contract and their club refuses to allow them to leave, which is why I agree that Adelaide shouldn't allow Cameron to leave under any circumstances.Things change though. In the AFL climate the number of years is almost becoming more important than the monetary figure. You'd be mad not to sign a longer deal if you had the chance to.
Yeah leave him to fester for a year, that is productive in a high performance environmentThen players shouldn't complain when they try moving mid contract and their club refuses to allow them to leave, which is why I agree that Adelaide shouldn't allow Cameron to leave under any circumstances.
Then players shouldn't complain when they try moving mid contract and their club refuses to allow them to leave, which is why I agree that Adelaide shouldn't allow Cameron to leave under any circumstances.
Motlop is a RFA ..Dodongo thinks that if Adelaide get Motlop then they will be willing to trade Cameron for the pick the club want to trade him for.
Motlop is a RFA ..